Is that long enough, not long enough?7 years, semi-officially.
Is that long enough, not long enough?7 years, semi-officially.
Depends on how you see it.Is that long enough, not long enough?
In many cases, after 5 years, when a product becomes vintage, they won’t repair it anymore.How long, on average, does Apple obsolete a product and no longer provide repair services?
What is the average time before a product becomes vintage? Someone above suggested 7 years.In many cases, after 5 years, when a product becomes vintage, they won’t repair it anymore.
"Vintage" and "Obsolete" are different concepts in Apple-speak:What is the average time before a product becomes vintage? Someone above suggested 7 years.
So does that mean if Apple released the Mac Studio in 2022, sold it until 2023, it would be 5 and 7 years from 2023?"Vintage" and "Obsolete" are different concepts in Apple-speak:
Obtaining service for your Apple product after an expired warranty - Apple Support
Learn about your options for getting service and parts for Apple devices that are past their warranty period.support.apple.com
- Products are considered vintage when Apple stopped distributing them for sale more than 5 and less than 7 years ago.
- Products are considered obsolete when Apple stopped distributing them for sale more than 7 years ago. Apple discontinues all hardware service for obsolete products, with the sole exception of Mac notebooks that are eligible for an additional battery-only repair period. Service providers cannot order parts for obsolete products.
You’re only guaranteed repair support for five years.So does that mean if Apple released the Mac Studio in 2022, sold it until 2023, it would be 5 and 7 years from 2023?
Is 5 years acceptable for the target market for these machines? How often do creative professionals normally replace their machines?https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201624
see the link above. The product is vintage after five years in Apple’s world. In many cases, They only guarantee support with repairs for five years.
you bet your bottom dollar that if I put down between 4000~$5000, I would want to make the computer go for much longer than five years. And I would want to be able to service it myself, when the company that sold it to me no longer supported it for repairs.
So in the perspective of Apple Silicon Macs, it seems a longer than usual coverage is needed since most things are soldered in, and with how Apple designs its system and software these days it will be harder to source for 3rd party or even self-repair.
Apple doesn’t have exclusive possession or control of supply of computers. They have exclusive possession and control over supply of Macs, but then of course they do, the Mac is their product.this is sounding more and more like the textbook definition of a monopoly with each passing day. You are sold a product by company, only they can repair it, and then they decide when it is obsolete.View attachment 1979025
There are people still using Mac pros with upgraded graphics cards,firmware and ssds from 2010 (Or even earlier)..Is 5 years acceptable for the target market for these machines? How often do creative professionals normally replace their machines?
Apple doesn’t have exclusive possession or control of supply of computers. They have exclusive possession and control over supply of Macs, but then of course they do, the Mac is their product.
You can’t have a monopoly of your own product, it’s defined by the wider market that the product exists in.
Is that the norm or not?There are people still using Mac pros with upgraded graphics cards,firmware and ssds from 2010 (Or even earlier)..
The very first thing you have to do when trying a monopoly case is define the market that is being monopolised. You can’t define the market as Macs because they are but a single player in the larger personal computer market.If a company sells you a product, only they can repair it, only they can service it, and then they decide when the product is retired, that is enough of a monopoly for a lot of legislators all over the world to wanna take action against Apple. And that’s exactly what is happening.
I don’t think that’s how that would work. If regulators want to implement a ‘right to repair’ bill, or any minimum standards on warranties etc, it would apply to all personal computer manufacturers, not just Apple.If a company sells you a product, only they can repair it, only they can service it, and then they decide when the product is retired, that is enough of a monopoly for a lot of legislators all over the world to wanna take action against Apple. And that’s exactly what is happening.
The trick is to think of Macs as appliances rather than traditional PCs. I think we are moving towards a world where computers become more like appliances than traditional computers that have standardised parts. Requiring standardisation of parts limits innovation, and if there’s one thing Apple definitely is is innovative!Let's be honest, the moment when Apple announced the Apple Silicon transition for Macs we knew the Macs are going to be expensive "iPhones". The only observation remains is how far away they are going from it. Even with the later Intel MacBooks, the glued battery cells, the top case with embedded keyboards, the soldered in storage etc, none of it speaks the same language as your brick and mortar PC building methodology as far as repairs are concerned.
I am not saying it is a good or bad thing, but it is indeed different. If the buyer sees the added performance gains (which is evident in the M1 SoC approach), or the "ease" of owning a disposable piece of equipment which you can recycle as is, then it is a choice for you.
If that's where the industry is heading then it leaves not much room for the consumers. But at the very least the consumer can change his/her purchasing habits.The trick is to think of Macs as appliances rather than traditional PCs. I think we are moving towards a world where computers become more like appliances than traditional computers that have standardised parts. Requiring standardisation of parts limits innovation, and if there’s one thing Apple definitely is is innovative!
The same thing is happening to cars.
I agree, Apple are probably way out ahead on the hardware front vs what software is capable of using! Try the lower end model first to see if it meets your needs, and if not, send it back and go upwards from there.If that's where the industry is heading then it leaves not much room for the consumers. But at the very least the consumer can change his/her purchasing habits.
Take the base M1 MBA for example. At that base binned price point, forgo the so called 8Gb RAM swapping SSD wearing danger, just roll with this model even for professional workflows, many people managed to survive more than a year. I myself purchased it with the intend to just test the waters, as I almost always had to BTO higher configs in the Intel days or even the PPC days of buying Macs. But it turns out the base M1 MBA is more computer than most people needs. The saving in that model against a BTO MBP 14" for instance is huge, like 1 for 2. I can forget about repairing or even didn't think twice on getting AC+ for the MBA, which is like 20% of it cost, just no.
However, things change dramatically for the higher tier Macs. With the laptops I can see an integrated system is the norm, but for a desktop? The Ultra configs starts at $4000, and easily scales to 6+ even with sensible upgrades. The risk vs prospects of owning this thing becomes a much harder math compared to the "pre-appliance" days of Mac ownership. And the performance gains do not seem to scale as well as the entry level Apple Silicon, maybe because of efficiency is not quite necessary on the top end.
Therefore I suggest modern Mac buyers at least change your mindset a bit, stop future-proofing, maybe even under-spec your Mac purchase nowadays. The M2 next year even the base binned chip is rumored to have higher single core performance than the M1 Ultra, for one.
yes, and if they sell it until 2025, you can start counting from then, even if you bought it in 2022So does that mean if Apple released the Mac Studio in 2022, sold it until 2023, it would be 5 and 7 years from 2023?