isgoed said:Nah, you're just talking headless iMac (as I've heard a thousand times before).
isgoed said:Apple will not cut in its own iMac sales.
isgoed said:Apple's offering was: The $1499 single processor PowerMac. You could change the graphics card and upgrade hard-disk/ram yourself. Big mistake on Apple's part to scrap that one.
MacQuest said:I said "This is my prediction".
Whether it's in the near future [like next week at NAB] or at WWDC when the Mac Pros will be introduced [more likely, since they'll probably be significantly re-designed], it's obvious that Apple has a HUGE product line AND price gap between the highest end Mac mini Intel @ $799 and the lowest Power Mac non-Intel @ $1999.
That's $1200 "epepper9", FYI. And let's see, who likes to upgrade their desktop computers and not use integrated graphics? Hmmm... let's see. OH! GAMERS!. But there's no games for Mac. OH! BOOT CAMP!
Does 2 + 2 = 5 to any of you who are lyfao? Here's a dime, go buy a clue.
I hope that Apple will introduce a miniature version of the Power Mac tower to compete with all of those sub-$1000 - $1500ish towers offered by ALL of the other PC manufacturers. Apple will clean up in that market now that they've introduced Boot Camp.
Again, I say [by WWDC]:
Mac Pro Mini
[upgradeable mini-towers with a single socketed[?... I hope] 32-bit Yonah Core Duo processor]:
- $1099 [128 VRAM + 160GB 7200 rpm hard drive]
- $1399 [256 VRAM + 250GB 7200 rpm hard drive].
(BOTH iMacs AND PowerMacs use 7200 rpm hard drives in those same capacities for the low end and high end models BTW)
^squirrel^ said:Sorry, only skimmed over this thread. Now i feel like a prat!
besiktas jk said:Anyone still expecting an announcement today ?![]()
haleyvan said:no, definitely not. this crap is so annoying. every rumor regarding the release date of these things on this site has been wrong.
zac4mac said:
®îçhå®? said:I agree but all of Apple's previous events have happened at 10 so there is still hope. (not that i expect it).
Just as long as they are available by mid July
BRLawyer said:It was never supposed to happen...you shall see something by end of April, not now...
Those of you who were set on something happening today should read the rumors a little more closely. Note the following phrase in the original post:besiktas jk said:If it's going to be definitely on tuesday, then there is just one tuesday left in April, which is 25th of April, this means one more week to wait again.
Now, what is going to boost sales substantially other than a MacBook release?Macrumors said:according to reports, internal CPU sales goals at retail Apple Stores have been increased substantially starting in May. These estimates suggest Apple is expecting a boost to sales for their CPUs in the next four weeks.
KindredMAC said:Case closed people... nothing today.
jacobj said:Apple works on pacific time in which case it has now only just passed 8.30
revfife said:Let's just hope this doesn't turn into a "MacBooks next Tuesday" debacle where every week we will have someone posting on it.![]()
QCassidy352 said:No. You said you'd rather see a stripped down 15" MBP sold for cheaper than see a 15" MB. That's what's never going to happen. Why would they price and spec it like a consumer product but keep the "pro" casing and name? Why would you even prefer that?![]()
I'd be happy with that. But apple has never priced 15" laptops in the "pro" line anywhere near $1500, and I don't see why they'd start now. If there's a $1500 15" laptop, it'll be in the consumer line.
Ok, so like I said before, let's streamline it down to just one laptop and one desktop. Perfect simplicity.![]()
Of course simplicity is good. But so is actually selling products that your customers want. Apple's lineup is already one of the most simple of any major computer maker. Compare to Dell: They have 3 lines, low (2 sizes), medium, (3 sizes) and high (2 sizes) end. IMO, that's too much. But 2 consumer sizes and 3 pro sizes is not.
There clearly needs to be a balance. Having 4 sizes of macbook and 4 sizes of MBP would be too many choices at the cost of efficient streamlining. Having 1 size of macbook and 2 sizes of MBP would be too far the other way, and I really hope apple doesn't do it.