Because kabunaru is a glutton for punishment!![]()
![]()
This will sound stupid.... What does that mean?
Because kabunaru is a glutton for punishment!![]()
![]()
would be great if the new macbook pro looks quietly similar to this one :
(just forget the stupid screen-glass trackpad and the black bezel)
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thats would be amazing!
This will sound stupid.... What does that mean?
13": 1280·800 » 1366·768 (give-and-take but 2.5% more pixels)I don't get everyone's fascination with a 16:9 screen over a 16:10. What will you get out of a wider but shorter screen? less screen space, less pixels?
16:9's only benefit that I can see, is that some movies will fit perfectly. Most summer blockbuster movies aren't even made to fit 16:9, so either way you're gonna end up with black bars.
Sure, it also changes the overall dimensions of the laptop, but is it really any convenience for a laptop to get wider?
I'm not trying to sound condescending to those who want 16:9, i just don't get how it's any better than 16:10. Please enlighten me.
must every person who takes a photo of a new product only put like 20% in to the actual picture? it seems to me, that these leakers don't know how to hold a camera!
13": 1280·800 » 1366·768 (give-and-take but 2.5% more pixels)
15": 1440·900 » 1600·900 (wider)
17": 1680·1050 » 1920·1080 (larger)
At least that's what we're hoping. If they go down, then I'm not for 16:9.
It looks more like a MacBook than a MacBook Pro. especially since it has two usb ports on the left side.
13": 1280·800 » 1366·768 (give-and-take but 2.5% more pixels)
15": 1440·900 » 1600·900 (wider)
17": 1680·1050 » 1920·1080 (larger)
At least that's what we're hoping. If they go down, then I'm not for 16:9.
13": 1280·800 » 1366·768 (give-and-take but 2.5% more pixels)
15": 1440·900 » 1600·900 (wider)
17": 1680·1050 » 1920·1080 (larger)
At least that's what we're hoping. If they go down, then I'm not for 16:9.
I would absolutely love at 16:9 16" at 1920x1200 at $1799. Too good to be true?
My Aluminum PB has a small metal ring around both ports, so it doesn't seem too unlikely.
Great design, i just hope up coming Macbook Pro line, solves heat problem![]()
back to 16:9 vs 16:10 debate! I still want more opinions, why why why?
What don't you get? Would you rather have more or less real estate?![]()
more.
What don't you get? Would you rather have more or less real estate?![]()
If so, they'll probably do it by using 25 W CPUs, low-end and lower-midrange GPUs.Great design, i just hope up coming Macbook Pro line, solves heat problem![]()