Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
just saying..but im watchin jeopardy and the question was "iknow it maakes the macbook pro"
 
They are both great laptops, but 200 dollars is not a small difference. Also, apple laptops have way higher resale values in the future than any other laptops in the market.

Also, apple laptops are way thinner and lighter than others.

I wasn't trying to argue about that, just wondering why Sony are putting full HD res on 13 inch laptops and not Apple, when they've usually led the way with screen tech. My comment on price was only to correct the other guy who was implying the MBP was cheaper. I'm not denying both laptops are fantastic. Although I'm guessing the Vaio will be lighter in this case, because I had to get the 15inch because an i5 processor wasn't an option on the 13 inch. :D

I'm not trying to argue, merely question why Sony has a higher res screen at 13 inch. Just that guy jumped on my comment like I was trying to flame. Which I assure everyone isn't my intention. Maybe they have good reasons for that res on the 13 MBP, I'm curious on peoples opinions for it.
 
Last edited:
how much u guys think itll cost to upgrade the 15" from the opitical drive to ssd

I wanna know how this would work...so I'd have one HDD with 16 GB SSD and another solely SSD? I don't really get that. I don't need 2 HDD, I just want one 256 GB SSD, so is that gonna even be possible. Guess I'll have to wait and see...
 
I want the MBP for the power and battery life. I wanted the 13" because I'm a college student and don't want to lug a 15 incher around and also up the ass for a 15" to avoid the ODD.

Student? If you are often on your feet go 13'' dude. Unless you need the graphics and video edit stuff but then your college should offer those facilities.
 
So if you swap the superdrive for a SSD, you'd then end up with a notebook with three (!) disks: one small SSD for the system, the default classic HDD and then another SSD in the superdrive-bay?

I can only imagine the chaos in the Finder. That doesn't sound like Apple at all.

Yeah, I totally get what you're saying.

Besides, doesn't arn = grain of salt? Or perhaps not. If these offerings are even 80% accurate, I'm going to be very tempted to sell my 15" 2.66 i7 w/OWC Mercury Extreme 120 + 500 GB Momentus XT dual drive system, in favour of the better screen resolution and battery life.

I wonder if there'll be an option to get a higher-than-1680x1050 option on the 15s....
 
So if you swap the superdrive for a SSD, you'd then end up with a notebook with three (!) disks: one small SSD for the system, the default classic HDD and then another SSD in the superdrive-bay?

I can only imagine the chaos in the Finder. That doesn't sound like Apple at all.

What if the 16 SSD is hidden from the user, only being able to see it by modifying some checkbox in finder preferences?
 
I just bought a MBP a week ago so i still have the option to return it and upgrade. Should i return it before thursday to make sure i get a full refund and theyre not like wtf this is an old one.... OR should i just wait till thursday and return it + upgrade in the same day?
 
I wanna know how this would work...so I'd have one HDD with 16 GB SSD and another solely SSD? I don't really get that. I don't need 2 HDD, I just want one 256 GB SSD, so is that gonna even be possible. Guess I'll have to wait and see...

Of course, it will be possible like they offer it now. You just have to pay more.

256 GB SSD is very expensive.
 
I want the MBP for the power and battery life. I wanted the 13" because I'm a college student and don't want to lug a 15 incher around and also up the ass for a 15" to avoid the ODD.
Most people uses optical drive in their life, i cannot imagine using a laptop without one. External drive just doesnt cut it when you have to bring an addiation drive out, it is just not very convienent.
 
They are both great laptops, but 200 dollars is not a small difference. Also, apple laptops have way higher resale values in the future than any other laptops in the market.

Also, apple laptops are way thinner and lighter than others.

Well Sony Z is actually alot lighter than apples laptops and has better specs for the same price...

and the resale value of a year old sony z is pretty high too...
 
I wasn't trying to argue about that, just wondering why Sony are putting full HD res on 13 inch laptops and not Apple, when they've usually led the way with screen tech. My comment on price was only to correct the other guy who was implying the MBP was cheaper. I'm not denying both laptops are fantastic. Although I'm guessing the Vaio will be lighter in this case, because I had to get the 15inch because an i5 processor wasn't an option on the 13 inch.

I'm not trying to argue, merely question why Sony has a higher res screen at 13 inch. Just that guy jumped on my comment like I was trying to flame. Which I assure everyone isn't my intention. Maybe they have good reasons for that res on the 13 MBP, I'm curious on peoples opinions for it.

They don't put such an high resolution on the 13 because they can't, they don't because they don't want to.

1080P on a 13" inch? Useless except for spec addicts
 
- Matte screen option on the higher-end 13"

This better become standard, or an option that costs nothing extra.
I don't want to pay $300 for a higher end 13" and then another $100-$200 for a matte screen.

FYI:

Current 15" MacBook Pro has an option for a Matte Screen at an additional $150.

screenshot20110222at409.png
 
What if the 16 SSD is hidden from the user, only being able to see it by modifying some checkbox in finder preferences?

that would make sense, personally i don't use the os files unless i modify like the dock, or things of that nature (but not much at all). its probably better for regular users anyway, not as confusing
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_6 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E200 Safari/6533.18.5)

So $1500 for upgraded 13 then $100 more for matte? Screw that.

It probably won't be $100 for matte if the resolutions are the same. The $150 difference now is just because the resolution is also bumped up and the high res glossy is +100 so I'm assuming they'll either return it to either for the same price like my generation or make it +50, at least I hope.
 
Did you really expect an i5/i7 in a 13" macbook pro? This is apple we're talking about. Just be thankful its not Core 2 Duo anymore.

I had an i5 in a Vaio CW series that I bought last year and I was not all that impressed. But maybe that's because Apple OS kills Windows 7 haha
 
If there really is no more white MacBook and the 13in Pro doesn't start at $999 then I'll be buying a left over MacBook.
 
Most people uses optical drive in their life, i cannot imagine using a laptop without one. External drive just doesnt cut it when you have to bring an addiation drive out, it is just not very convienent.

Most People won't use an optical drive in their life, I cannon imagine using a laptop with one.

2 years from now, dvd drives in laptops will be vintage
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.