They are both great laptops, but 200 dollars is not a small difference. Also, apple laptops have way higher resale values in the future than any other laptops in the market.
Also, apple laptops are way thinner and lighter than others.
how much u guys think itll cost to upgrade the 15" from the opitical drive to ssd
I want the MBP for the power and battery life. I wanted the 13" because I'm a college student and don't want to lug a 15 incher around and also up the ass for a 15" to avoid the ODD.
So if you swap the superdrive for a SSD, you'd then end up with a notebook with three (!) disks: one small SSD for the system, the default classic HDD and then another SSD in the superdrive-bay?
I can only imagine the chaos in the Finder. That doesn't sound like Apple at all.
So if you swap the superdrive for a SSD, you'd then end up with a notebook with three (!) disks: one small SSD for the system, the default classic HDD and then another SSD in the superdrive-bay?
I can only imagine the chaos in the Finder. That doesn't sound like Apple at all.
I wanna know how this would work...so I'd have one HDD with 16 GB SSD and another solely SSD? I don't really get that. I don't need 2 HDD, I just want one 256 GB SSD, so is that gonna even be possible. Guess I'll have to wait and see...
Hold on, I may not have paid attention but i3 for 13"?
No.
Most people uses optical drive in their life, i cannot imagine using a laptop without one. External drive just doesnt cut it when you have to bring an addiation drive out, it is just not very convienent.I want the MBP for the power and battery life. I wanted the 13" because I'm a college student and don't want to lug a 15 incher around and also up the ass for a 15" to avoid the ODD.
They are both great laptops, but 200 dollars is not a small difference. Also, apple laptops have way higher resale values in the future than any other laptops in the market.
Also, apple laptops are way thinner and lighter than others.
I wasn't trying to argue about that, just wondering why Sony are putting full HD res on 13 inch laptops and not Apple, when they've usually led the way with screen tech. My comment on price was only to correct the other guy who was implying the MBP was cheaper. I'm not denying both laptops are fantastic. Although I'm guessing the Vaio will be lighter in this case, because I had to get the 15inch because an i5 processor wasn't an option on the 13 inch.
I'm not trying to argue, merely question why Sony has a higher res screen at 13 inch. Just that guy jumped on my comment like I was trying to flame. Which I assure everyone isn't my intention. Maybe they have good reasons for that res on the 13 MBP, I'm curious on peoples opinions for it.
Maybe Apple considers the 11.6" MacBook Air the new MacBook.
- Matte screen option on the higher-end 13"
This better become standard, or an option that costs nothing extra.
I don't want to pay $300 for a higher end 13" and then another $100-$200 for a matte screen.
What if the 16 SSD is hidden from the user, only being able to see it by modifying some checkbox in finder preferences?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_6 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8E200 Safari/6533.18.5)
So $1500 for upgraded 13 then $100 more for matte? Screw that.
I'd take an educated guess and say
1) Intel HD for 13"
2) nVidia 425M GT for 15"+
Though I would rather see them go with Ati but I'm guessing that just wont happen...
Did you really expect an i5/i7 in a 13" macbook pro? This is apple we're talking about. Just be thankful its not Core 2 Duo anymore.
Most people uses optical drive in their life, i cannot imagine using a laptop without one. External drive just doesnt cut it when you have to bring an addiation drive out, it is just not very convienent.
Well Sony Z is actually alot lighter than apples laptops and has better specs for the same price...
and the resale value of a year old sony z is pretty high too...