I'm not against Wintel computers. ThinkPad's are some nice laptops.
However, I would feel guilty selling anyone an HP and always swallow my concerns when a friend beams at their new HP laptop.
As for overall durability, I've got a decent stack of Dell Latitude D series laptops that would speak against the rarely "broken, cracked, or discolored" plastic. Yes, they are 4 to 6 years old and boy do they look it. Every one of them has at least one of the "broken, cracked, or discolored" plastics. I don't know that I'd expect they shouldn't after 4 years plus, I'm just saying that I don't think it's rare.
Even so, if Apple used a plastic akin to ThinkPads, I'd prefer it to aluminum.
How were those systems used throughout their lives? I've only seen plastic Macs crack and discolor with light or regular use. I mean, the current plastic MacBook is basically the only plastic notebook on the market that has hinge cracking issues within weeks or months of purchase.
HP Envy 14 does not have Sandy Bridge. Good machine for the money. The new base Macbook Pro should be $999. Given extra battery life (but lower graphics). Got to consider Mac trackpads and magsafe worth a little extra dough as well.
I might be wrong about Sandy Bridge, but the fact remains that the Envy 14 at Fry's for $999 will still be significantly better than any 13" MacBook or "Pro".
We're not talking about lower graphics. We're talking about a GPU in the new Macs that can't even begin to climb the mountain while the HP system is already half way to the top.
HP sells extended life batteries too.
I've never liked MagSafe on my Macs. Cord is too fragile and I've seen too many fray and start to spark.
I've never really cared for the multi-touch trackpad either. It's annoying to me that I have to actually set preferences to make it work like it should with tap to click.
As someone already pointed out, no it's not Sandy Bridge, it's first gen core although still a very good CPU and much better than the C2D. I looked into getting the Envy 14 when it was announced and followed it very closely. The 6 hour battery life is not what I've read from many user reports, but closer to 4-5 hours, you can get 6-7 if you have the slice battery. Also there is a "whining" noise that comes from these laptops, supposedly from the CPU, this could've been fixed though. If we're going to complain about resolution here, then might as well on this 14.5" at 1366x768 it's no better than the 13.3 with 1280x800. Yes, there WAS a 1600x900 radiance option but some silly reason HP took that away, so that point is moot. That trackpad they tried to copy? TERRIBLE. I don't think I've read ONE good review on that touchpad. Even for $999 I'm not finding a lot of people jumping on this ship.
Again, I might be wrong about Sandy Bridge, but that doesn't discount the fact that the current $999 Envy 14 at Fry's will be a significantly better system than any 13" Mac.
The reviews I've read put the real world battery use for the Envy at 6-7 hours. Especially user reviews.
1366x768 is better than 1280x800 because its a proper 16x9 aspect ratio.
Having used a Mac for several years, I don't see why people seem to think the touchpad is good. Theres nothing special about it. Multi-touch gestures are essentially useless and Lion is just going to hack some features into OS X to finally be able to say "we're using it!"
I'm leaving my options open as I've seen some decent windows based machines on the horizon w/ SB, but some features of Apple like OSX + trackpad keep me grounded with them.. we'll see what the 15" has to offer as well as the 13" high end.
Frustration with how limiting OS X is is the reason I finally built a new desktop PC. For the price of the Mac mini I was able to build a desktop with a Phenom II X6 1055T (stable at 3.5GHz using stock cooling, 25c idle), GeForce GTX 460 1GB, 8GB of RAM, etc. According to the benchmarks I've run, I have more CPU power than the $2,500 Mac Pro and more GPU power than any stock shipping Mac all for the same price as Apple's cheapest Mac.