That didn't even occur to me. Before the Mac Pro reveal, I would have scoffed at that notion.
Now...? Hmm...
Mr. Ive, What do you think?
Exactly, but most people now will probably praise it when/if it's released.
That didn't even occur to me. Before the Mac Pro reveal, I would have scoffed at that notion.
Now...? Hmm...
Mr. Ive, What do you think?
Fusion drive gives you SSD speed, so the only bad thing is that it uses a bit more juice than SSD only.Even fusion drives are a band-aid to the problem. Probably the best band-aid ever, but still a band-aid.
well, the asus 4k 31" display was just announced a week ago.. at 3799$
but i can't imagine apple to sell a display anywhere around that price.
No dGPU for critical graphics work?If I need to do critical graphics work, I'll be at my desk with the 27" display. Otherwise give me the most computer in the smallest package. That means a quad-core 13"
I know it's hard to imagine that there are people with different needs than you. Maybe every time I need to create motion graphics or use ProPresenter away from home, I can pay to ship a 27" display around the country just so I can function in my hotel room. If I always used a display for work, I wouldn't need a MacBookPro, now would I?
I know it's hard to imagine that there are people with different needs than you.
Thing is, we don't have to imagine anything at all. Apple knew EXACTLY how big the market for 17" MacBook Pros was - and it clearly was not only too small to be worth the R&D investment in a 17" rMBP, and not only was it too small to be worth the R&D investment in adding USB 3.0 and new processors, it was too small to even warrant keeping it in production with the old specs.
Something I've learned to accept in life - not only does the fact that I think something is terrific not mean it's necessarily commercially viable, the very fact that I do is a good indicator that it's NOT commercially viable.
Thing is, we don't have to imagine anything at all. Apple knew EXACTLY how big the market for 17" MacBook Pros was - and it clearly was not only too small to be worth the R&D investment in a 17" rMBP, and not only was it too small to be worth the R&D investment in adding USB 3.0 and new processors, it was too small to even warrant keeping it in production with the old specs.
If people can request a larger iPhone screen, which *I* don't see a need for, I can request a return to a 17" MBP. Thanks
After not offering a 17" MBP for about a year, the pent up demand may justify a new offering. Also, a 17" rMBP display would necessarily have been very expensive a year ago, but would not be so expensive this year due to large improvements in yields. In sum, I would not be surprised if Apple were to offer a 17"rMBP in the future, possibly this year.
You can request whatever you bloody well want from whomever you want, but Apple's only going to release products that THEY think they should.
----------
LOL. They discontinued the existing model when they didn't discontinue the 13 and 15. It's not happening. There IS NO PROFITABLE DEMAND.
LOL. They discontinued the existing model when they didn't discontinue the 13 and 15. It's not happening. There IS NO PROFITABLE DEMAND.
My wife and I are looking to switch from Windows to Mac with next year's tax refund. Been looking at the non-retina MBP line because of the bigger and cheaper storage options. I love the retina display but we need at least 1TB to be able to replace our desktop. The price for similar storage on the rMBP is just to high for my taste.
I say all this because I hope Apple isn't abandoning the non-r MBP line. The display may not be as pretty but they have the better bang for your buck when it comes to storage. Just hope they continue to update the non-retinas as well, or offer regular HDD options to the rMBP.
Surely you're not going to need that whole 1TB of data every single time you use the MBP.... 512GB of data when you go portable should be more than enough.That is an option but I'd rather not have to carry an external drive around everywhere we take the MBP.