gotta agree. Apple side is slicker and easier.
That being said I just returned my 2010 MBP 15" refurb (still have my iMac)
and bought a
HP Pavilion Quad-core i7 Sandy Bridge cpu, ATi 6750 gpu with 1gb video ram, 750gb hard drive, 6gb ram, 15" screen, ... for $850.
MBP was very nice, but was nearly $500 more than this HP and that was least year's model. To get this gpu in a new Mac laptop you need to spend $2200.
Now to see if I can put with the hassles of this machine. Going to miss the trackpad and nice screen of the 15" MBP that's for sure. Still fo rthe saving I can buy an Ipad or a trackpad and SSD and time capsule etc.
It really depends on what Dell you get. Dell Inspiron's are probably what large companies are buying and, yes, their build quality isn't great but it's also very cheap. Dell XPS is what most users buy for personal use and their build quality is pretty good. The new 15" XPS was just released so we no one knows how the build quality is yet. The new MBP have their own build quality issues according to IFixIt's breakdown of it.Dell has poor quality control, build quality, and customer service and support. Plus you are stuck with Windows.
I've worked as an IT Architect and consultant for some very big name companies and seen 3 or four of them dump Dell completely because of poor quality and support. These are companies that buy many thousands of desktops and laptops a year and had finally had it with Dell.
Resale quality of these pieces of plastic is very poor as well.
That's kind of how I'm looking at it. I'd prefer the MBP 15" for sure, but really can I justify it? If I want OSX that bad I guess I can just do a Hackintosh. I could use the $1000+ cash to pay for a week in Sanibel, oceanfront.![]()
This is exactly what I didI have an Acer Aspire One and turned it into a Hackintosh. All I had to do was replace the wireless card but that was only $15 on ebay.
My guess is that you will be using this computer everyday for 3-4 years.
If that's the case, look at the per day cost of use of the Apple vs Dell over the next 3 years and ask yourself if you wouldn't pay an extra 30-40 cents per day to be completely worry free regarding viruses, customer service, usability, reliability, trackpad, software, Mac OSX, and resale value.
To me, it's an easy decision, but only you can make the decision for yourself.
gotta agree. Apple side is slicker and easier.
That being said I just returned my 2010 MBP 15" refurb (still have my iMac)
and bought a
HP Pavilion Quad-core i7 Sandy Bridge cpu, ATi 6750 gpu with 1gb video ram, 750gb hard drive, 6gb ram, 15" screen, ... for $850.
MBP was very nice, but was nearly $500 more than this HP and that was least year's model. To get this gpu in a new Mac laptop you need to spend $2200.![]()
So now we are trying to rationalize $800 more by talking about the daily costs? Seriously? Why not buy 20 MBP and put them in every room of the house and give them to every family member? It's only 30-40 cents a day if you spread it over a few years....My guess is that you will be using this computer everyday for 3-4 years.
If that's the case, look at the per day cost of use of the Apple vs Dell over the next 3 years and ask yourself if you wouldn't pay an extra 30-40 cents per day to be completely worry free regarding viruses, customer service, usability, reliability, trackpad, software, Mac OSX, and resale value.
To me, it's an easy decision, but only you can make the decision for yourself.
So now we are trying to rationalize $800 more by talking about the daily costs? Seriously? Who told you Macs dont get viruses? You realize that Mac OS X is more vunerable than Windows 7 right? Do a google search on it. Apple is even looking for security professionals to make their next release more secure.
http://blogs.computerworld.com/17895/new_trojan_targets_the_mac_while_apple_finally_reaches_out_to_security_pros
and if you accidently drop your laptop or spill water on it then your screwed as an Apple user. No, MBP have always had a huge premium compared to other computers. They have had the best battery life but you can easily extend battery life by having an extra battery ($100 or less). One of the reasons Apple's battery life has been so good is because it doesn't have the higher performance hardware in it. With the release of Optimus-enabled computers now you can get 6+ hours easy with non-Apple PCs.if you're a mobile pro like a photographer you don't have time to spend 4 hours on hold with dell and another 2 hours running diagnostics. you just go to the apple store, show them your laptop and they check it out on the spot
until sandy bridge MBP's were the cheapest laptop in the high battery life category
if you're a mobile pro like a photographer you don't have time to spend 4 hours on hold with dell and another 2 hours running diagnostics. you just go to the apple store, show them your laptop and they check it out on the spot
My guess is that you will be using this computer everyday for 3-4 years.
If that's the case, look at the per day cost of use of the Apple vs Dell over the next 3 years and ask yourself if you wouldn't pay an extra 30-40 cents per day to be completely worry free regarding viruses, customer service, usability, reliability, trackpad, software, Mac OSX, and resale value.
To me, it's an easy decision, but only you can make the decision for yourself.
You would get the same message from Apple, no warranty covers accidental damage unless it explicitly says soi've been on the phone with dell and HP. i remember years ago when working for a major dell customer i would call the regular 800 number because the express code shortcut i would wait a lot longer. with HP and server support i usually just do the chat since it's a lot faster for things like bad hard drives.
the last time i had a hp laptop from work i spent hours on hold just waiting. and when i sent my laptop in they said it was my fault the screen broke. the 3 year included warranty was worthless and they wouldn't even send the laptop back unless i paid $90. and this was a $1500 corporate model laptop.
You would get the same message from Apple, no warranty covers accidental damage unless it explicitly says so
also, 90 for a screen repair is very cheap
$90 was to send it back broken. screen was $400. and it was some LCD crystals broken inside, no physical damage. and a year after they fixed it the screen started breaking and then the hinges broke. piece of junk HP for $1500.
it's a laptop, i carry it in my bag everyday. and i noticed that everyone's build quality changed in the last year or so where the hinges are different and the covering around the LCD is much better. my boss's laptop started having the same issues as well. i bet a lot of other people did as well but HP refused warranty service unless you had bought the extra warranty on top of the 3 year included warranty
compare that with apple. my ipod or iphone broke and i had it replaced on the spot. with my ipod i even bought but never activated applecare. brought in the receipts and they still replaced it after the original warranty expired. there are like 10 apple stores in and around NYC i can go to and speak to real people in clear english
This debate will rage on forever.
Apple computers cost more than Dell computers for the same specs. The premium you pay is for build quality, operating system, and the coolness factor. If you don't care about any of those things (or believe there is no difference between Apple vs. Dell and OSX vs. W7), then get the Dell.
Both sides can cite all the anecdotal evidence they want about warranties or customer experience but what it comes down to is Apple = BMW, Dell = Toyota.
OS X isn't really that special anyone to be honest, Windows 7 is a huge step up from Vista and most "anti Windows" people haven't used it yet so their opinion is basically worthless.
you do realize that toyota and honda will kill BMW in quality. acura/lexus are just honda's and toyotas with higher price tags. made in the exact same factories and almost the exact same parts
Thunderbolt is only a novelty item. Right now it has very limited and very specific uses where it is actually useful. To take advantage of TB you also have to buy TB-equipped equipment. So unless you buy new equipment you probably wont be making use of TB for a while. I think we have to wait at least a year to really see if TB will catch on. Personally I just don't see it happening.