my last words on this, because it's a completely different topic and doesn't belong here.
just because something runs doesn't mean it runs as intended or well (see this topic).
same goes for any other OS, mobile or desktop, independent from the company.
and as you implied regarding iOS: they take precautions. because i know very well, how apple literally destroyed the iPhone 4S and iPad Mini 1 with iOS 9. the performance is a mess and there's no going back.
my MBP6,2 runs on mojave too. does it run well? no.
is it because of the beta phase (which it was excluded from intentionally)?
i don't know yet and we will see.
the (business) premise apple has set is modern technology and with mojave, it's the GPU.
Hello, I'm wondering something about the supported macs section. With the MacBook Pro's from 2010 to 2011, do you mean that all MacBooks from mid 2010 to late 2011 are supported, or only the mid 2010 and late 2011 MacBook Pro's? I would love to try this as my second partition. Thanks in advance.
You don't actually need to put it inside the kext. Just install it with kext utility. That way updates won't mess with it either
Nice!
When you created a new partition on your internal drive, did you create by "new partition or new volume". I can only do the latter for my formatted APFS drive.
Thanks.
[.
Thank you all for the comments and a big thanks for @dosdude1 for his big work! This is something awesome to get the new update on an old MacBook .
I just got an 2011 mid Air and it works fine, with no problem on it, no problem with sound, internet, or nothing else.
For those who get the "no logo" error when booting up:
After you install and patch, there is an very important thing, to edit the: :"/Volumes/Mojave/Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/com.apple.Boot.plist" "Kernel Flags" to "-v -no_compat_check keepsyms=1".
This probably will fix the no logo booting error, and your Mac will boot with the new software.
I got a question: Can we just update to the next beta when it comes out thru the AppStore, or we have to make a new USB installer with the next beta on it?
Farthest I got is boot to a black screen on the second stage. Similar CPU, Mac Pro 3,1.has anyone figured c2d at all?
Supporting new technology doesn't have to come at the cost of dropping support for older technology. Mojave is actually a good example of this; although Apple claims the OS requires Metal, it actually still contains the necessary code and frameworks for OpenGL and OpenCL support, even updated from the versions found in High Sierra.
There's a financial incentive for Apple to force users of older hardware to upgrade, and excuses like 32-bit EFI, Metal, or even just a 7 year cutoff work well. In reality, supporting these things would not cripple Apple's ability to also allow MacOS to fully take advantage of newer hardware and technology.
I haven't tried Mojave on a 2010 MacBook Pro 6,2, but my 2011 MacBook Pro 8,3 does run Mojave well, or at least as well as you can expect for a beta.
what does keepsyms=1 do? Curious.
keepsyms=1 saves the names of functions ("symbols") in kernel panic stack traces. I suggested it on a previous post, for troubleshooting purposes only. (The person who mentioned using -v -no_compat_check keepsyms=1, does not need it. It's the -no_compat_check that actually bypasses the (\) icon, as I'm sure you know.)
If you compare the panic log I posted a few pages back, with a panic log without this flag, you'll see that the backtrace is more informative.
Source: StackOverflow post (more interesting debug info here too)
it means that only core i's are supported at this point.
core 2 duo suffers from kernel panic right now.
I completely agree. It's not that they can't support hardware all the way back to 2008, but rather that they won't.They could easily support both. I am all for moving forward. But how hard would it to be cover every machine that supports High Sierra, Sierra and El Cap for that matter. It would not ruin their company.
2011 is Core i-series. It can run Mojave, however on the 15" / 17" the dedicated AMD GPU must be disabled, meaning you won't be able to connect external displays. There is still a possibility we will find a way to make it work properly, but since the GPU is very prone to failure you might be better off disabling it anyway.Hello, I have a 2011 MacBook Pro 15 inch - will Mojave work on this, or is there not a work around ?
are you able to disclose the CatalogURL for the 10.14 download? If you are able to can you share it?
Well, I have the 15 inch mid 2012 Retina MacBook Pro and was able to upgrade the SSD.Do you think 2011 MacBook Pro will work with Mojave ? I really don't want to move to the 2012, maybe the non-retina version - anything after 2012 is not upgradable anymore.
i bought a Late 2011 15" a few days ago, and i just learned it's about to lose support.. so i completely agree.
[doublepost=1530275304][/doublepost]
i don't want to throw it away. i just bought it a few days ago... thanks apple.
I found a solution for 2011 MacBook Pro owners!!!
1. replace the logic board wth a 2012 MacBook Pro logic board
2. install Mac OS 10.14
Benefits include:
1. cheap to upgrade around $200 - $300
2. metal support
3. USB 3 upgrade from usb 2
4. your Mac will be supported for at least 2-3 more years
5. support for faster cpu and ram
6. no need to hack SIP and night mode every time you update
We can whine about Apple not supporting all we want. We need to kick them and show them that they're wrong and the developer community can show them that we're smart. So let's do that instead of whining.I completely agree. It's not that they can't support hardware all the way back to 2008, but rather that they won't.
Yet there are still plenty of people who justify Apple's decisions to drop older hardware, either because they erroneously think that it does something good for their newer hardware (the space saved from removing the older kexts is tiny, I doubt it would even total 200 MB), or because they badly want to see a good reason for Apple dropping their older hardware.
2011 is Core i-series. It can run Mojave, however on the 15" / 17" the dedicated AMD GPU must be disabled, meaning you won't be able to connect external displays. There is still a possibility we will find a way to make it work properly, but since the GPU is very prone to failure you might be better off disabling it anyway.
I would say what we've accomplished in this thread already qualifies as more than whining. But I am sure that Apple is not paying attention or caring, and didn't with MacOS Sierra or Mountain Lion happily running on unsupported Macs either. 😉We can whine about Apple not supporting all we want. We need to kick them and show them that they're wrong and the developer community can show them that we're smart. So let's do that instead of whining.
I’m not annoyed , it’s just Apple is Apple and Apple will do whatever Apple likes. Pretty typical for themI would say what we've accomplished in this thread already qualifies as more than whining. But I am sure that Apple is not paying attention or caring, and didn't with MacOS Sierra or Mountain Lion happily running on unsupported Macs either. 😉
![]()
Unfortunately, for 2010 / 2011 iMac owners full acceleration on the AMD GPU is still an issue, as there is no integrated GPU to fall back on. I haven't been able to get that working yet. But Mojave does run with partial acceleration.
[doublepost=1530339615][/doublepost]Dosdude: Can you outline the steps for getting Mojave to work on the 2011 MacBook Pro 15 inch. Though many have had issues with their AMD GPUS, mine is still working very well.. never an issue and I hope there won't be any issue with it. Possibly, my system may be just lucky, I don't know. But, at this point what works for on the 2011 when running Mojave and what does not work ?I completely agree. It's not that they can't support hardware all the way back to 2008, but rather that they won't.
Yet there are still plenty of people who justify Apple's decisions to drop older hardware, either because they erroneously think that it does something good for their newer hardware (the space saved from removing the older kexts is tiny, I doubt it would even total 200 MB), or because they badly want to see a good reason for Apple dropping their older hardware.
2011 is Core i-series. It can run Mojave, however on the 15" / 17" the dedicated AMD GPU must be disabled, meaning you won't be able to connect external displays. There is still a possibility we will find a way to make it work properly, but since the GPU is very prone to failure you might be better off disabling it anyway.[/QUOTE
I would say what we've accomplished in this thread already qualifies as more than whining. But I am sure that Apple is not paying attention or caring, and didn't with MacOS Sierra or Mountain Lion happily running on unsupported Macs either. 😉
![]()
Unfortunately, for 2010 / 2011 iMac owners full acceleration on the AMD GPU is still an issue, as there is no integrated GPU to fall back on. I haven't been able to get that working yet. But Mojave does run with partial acceleration.
Thanks to @dosdude1's patcher app, I was able to install Mojave Public Beta without big problems!! ThanksView attachment 768397
Well, wait and see if the C2D issue(s) can be found and fixed. Currently completely unclear, but folks are at it!First of all Hello All.
Thanks for the tremendous work you do here.
I have a 27" iMac (late 2009) running High Sierra 10.13.6 Beta (17G54a). Until yesterday I was an happy beta tester. Happy until I understood that all is done for my mac lol. I downloaded the Mac OS Mojave patcher, the OS beta, made bootable usb external and began the installation. After a few hours, computer restarted and I got a prohibitory icon. So I restored from fresh Time machine backup I made just before installing. Is there any hope here for my mac to run Mojave?
It remembers me the time when Apple suddenly discarded SCSI and a lot of my users had to trash their Umax Powerlook scanners, not speaking of scientific instruments continuing to work on obsolete systems....
Anyway, a big thanks to all of you here.