I'm glad you also value RI option (real inteligente) to share your experience with us! Just kidding.
Interesting enough Sequoia also had a similar turning point at v15.3.2 -> 15.4. I don't know the reason, but my 15 MBP 2012 ran perfectly up to 15.3.2, but starting with 15.4 lots of glitches started to happen, video artifacts, internet connections failing, slow downs. This only happens with Mac running on Nvidia graphics. Maybe this is where OCLP started to abandon the project, I don't know.
In the end I've also returned to Sonoma, but running the current v14.8.5, since I don't use Compressor or the Safari WebGL. Every thing else works very smoothly, specially Photos which is the my main use for this Mac.
edit: Maybe give Sequoia 15.3.2 a try to see if it full fills your needs.
You’re absolutely right! I, too, never (and I mean never!!!) use Compressor; and as for Safari, with Chrome or Brave browser I was able to easily work around the single map I sometimes needed to use and that stopped working starting with version 14.4 (= the postal offices and points of poste.it search when I have to make Amazon returns).
Unfortunately, I’m a perfectionist, so not only was I annoyed by the non-working map, but when I realized that Apple had introduced a block for Compressor - right in the system itself (via 14.8.3 or 14.8.4) - seeing the Compressor icon with the lock/prohibited symbol gave me nightmares.
I’m partly joking 😛, don’t worry, but in the end I decided to dedicate a day to the downgrade to 14.3.1, and I don’t regret the result, having found that the Mac has gained a level of quietness and stability I’d forgotten.
I’ll wrap up by saying that this morning I finished installing programs and customizing the look of a relative’s new MacBook Air—she’s practically a computer novice—and Tahoe doesn’t make me regret at all having a 27” iMac from 2013, which is powerful and was top-of-the-line back then.
In terms of beauty and interface consistency, Sonoma wins.
Obviously, I’d notice a big difference if, for example, I were working with very heavy videos; but I almost never do that, and with normal FHD videos, I’ve never felt the need to rush through them.
Moreover, it’s true that the Finder, with Tahoe and a new Mac with a Silicon CPU, is very snappy and responsive; but I find this behavior a bit too twitchy compared to the Sequoia Finder, which, while also very responsive, moves with more fluidity even when opening folders filled with countless files and custom folders.
The behavior when navigating with Tahoe’s Finder is like this: Ta-ta-ta-ta-ta…. A machine gun 🤣🤣🤣. With Sonoma, on the other hand, you experience an equally responsive or fast performance, but one that’s smoother, more refined, and exudes elegance and charm: Taaaaaaa Taaaaaaa Taaaaaaa….I don’t know if I’ve managed to explain myself.
What about security?
Just avoid visiting dangerous websites and/or installing cracked apps. Otherwise, the only real protection comes from, for example, Avira Free, which not only flagged suspicious apps or those containing Trojans and RootKits, but also allowed me to identify certain web pages (which I had thought were safe) while browsing the Internet using Safari 26, since I hadn’t downgraded yet. But Avira even flagged HTML pages contained in some old emails in the ~/Library/Mail/V10/ subfolders, pointing out the “number-file.emlx” files that contained them and allowing me to delete those files.
Forget XProtect and its massive database of threats that Apple updates frequently, but never fast enough to keep up with the emergence of dangerous content...
After all, in four months Apple will stop updating Sonoma.
So, now that we’ve reached macOS 27 (which should be stable and fix both the bugs and the hideous design flaws of Tahoe) and with the new Mac Mini M5 models also on the way, even us die-hard fans of the past will be able to buy a new Mac and live happily for at least another 10 years 🤗