Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would like a Group by Folder option in Finder.

The current options for Group by are: Name, Kind, Application, Dates, Size, Tag.

File explorer on Windows has an option for grouping by folder.
Finder does have an option to keep folders at the top though. It’s in the Finder Settings
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
Liquid Glass is an absolute disaster for Apple.
Every time I make a comment on here there's easily a 10-1 ratio of likes to dislikes on my post so clearly most agree.

Dye is an absolute moron. Thank god he's out.

This is indefensible. Hopefully we don't have to live with this s$^#show much longer.View attachment 2604520

That should be fixed in the latest update. Check again. They reversed a lot of the extreme transparency that Tahoe 26.2 still had.
 
The rough spots in the Mac OS UI are still dwarfed by the rough spots in the Windows 11 UI, so I am not going to be too critical. It has taken Microsoft more than 15 years to get rid of UIs from the Vista era.

Windows still has a lot of XP era UI in the admin tools.

You can't compare Windows and macOS. Windows has to support apps that go back years. I have two apps from the late 90s that still work with minor fuss. Apple doesn't care about that level of backwards compatibility because their user base is much smaller and the company is design focused.
 
There’s a similar UI fail on iPadOS. If you have an app set hidden in slide over and load a large scrolling page in e.g. Safari, if you try to scroll the page and then grab the grey scroll bar so you can scroll more quickly, iPadOS will keep bringing in your slide over app instead of letting you scroll.
 
MacRumors should publish more articles that draw attention to issues like these.

It’s a win-win situation:
  1. Maximum community and reader engagement
  2. It puts the issue in the spotlight. After a few iterations, it gets Apple’s attention and helps avoid bad publicity.
This is far more productive than the endless complaining about things that are already top priorities for Apple and where public scrutiny won’t change anything (like the delayed Siri).
 
Why would anyone leave these ugly ass scrollbars always visible? It's NOT the default LOL this is not Windows. People who leave these things visible actually deserve this.
People have different ways of working. For some people, not having visible scrollbars makes it hard for them to navigate and know what to point to (or they may forget the column is longer than what is showing) etc.
 
I don’t know if Apple’s ability to produce quality Ui has been lost. The Dynamic Island is a recent and good example of quality work. Vision Pro, for all its faults, is good UI work. Mac was once everything to Apple; their complete focus could be poured into it. Now, it’s a very clear and distance third of four platforms. I more see this representing the time and resource and talent Apple is willing to invest into the Mac. This is the effort Apple believes the Mac is worth.
 
Last edited:


Apple released macOS Tahoe last September, but despite two point updates since then, it is still struggling to resolve an embarrassing interface issue in Finder that appears to have been introduced with its Liquid Glass redesign.

macOS-Tahoe-Finder-Bug-Underscores-Apples-Slipping-UI-Polish-Feature.jpg

If you updated your Mac to macOS Tahoe and you prefer to work in Finder's column view, there's a good chance you've been frustrated by the glitch, which developer Jeff Johnson has been admirably tracking over on his blog.

macos-tahoe-finder-column-view-bug3.jpg

Scroll bar blocking column resize handles (Original image: Jeff Johnson)

At the bottom of each Finder column are handy little resize handles allowing you to expand or reduce each column as you see fit. But in macOS 26 and macOS 26.2, when scroll bars are set to "always show," the horizontal scroll bar at the bottom overlaps and covers those handles, so you can't click them to adjust column widths the way you could in earlier macOS versions like Sequoia.

macos-tahoe-finder-column-view-bug2.jpg

Scroll bar occluding column content (Original image: Jeff Johnson)

With the recent release of macOS 26.3, Apple attempted a fix. The vertical scrollers were shortened so the resizing widgets now sit above the horizontal bar and are technically clickable again. Unfortunately though, as Johnson points out, the horizontal scroll bar still overlaps file names in the view, causing it to regularly obscure content. Moreover, if you hide the path bar and status bar, the layout leaves a weird amount of empty space below the scrollers, making the whole thing look unfinished (see image below).

macos-tahoe-finder-column-view-bug1.jpg

Column resize handles suspended in mid-air (Original image: Jeff Johnson)

Johnson's take is basically that while the most disruptive bug is less bad now, the overall column view layout still feels half-baked – especially for anyone who keeps scroll bars always visible.

As Daring Fireball's John Gruber points out, it's an embarrassing fudge for a company that used to pride itself on pixel-perfect settings across its Mac operating system.

At this point, it's unclear when Apple will manage to iron out the UI irregularities introduced by Liquid Glass. macOS Tahoe‌ 26.4 is likely to be released in March or April, and could introduce some new Siri features, though at least some of the capabilities that we were expecting may have been delayed, depending on who you believe. The update is also expected to introduce new emoji characters.

Article Link: macOS Tahoe Finder Bug Underscores Apple's Slipping UI Polish
Regardless of the 'they never used to do this stuff... this one flaw does drive me nuts. I count on that little trick! I'm glad to see it's not just me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank001
the simplest solution is to document the action, ' a bug is an undocumented feature' computer lore from the past
 
Windows still has a lot of XP era UI in the admin tools.

You can't compare Windows and macOS. Windows has to support apps that go back years. I have two apps from the late 90s that still work with minor fuss. Apple doesn't care about that level of backwards compatibility because their user base is much smaller and the company is design focused.
I agree with you for the most part, but I spend half of my day using Windows and still consider my Mac to be a breath of fresh air compared.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
I’ve never seen this either, I’m confused as well
You need to have scrollbars set to always display, which then makes them affect layout (they create an inner scrollable view and take up space for the scrollbars, vs displaying as an overlay as-needed).

This also changes resize behavior - rather than the divider between views being a thin resize handle, the thick scrollbar divider has a dedicated resize control.

Not taking scrollbar sizing into account is historically a pretty common problem with displayed scrollbars (it turns a scrollable view from having two 'size' values for customizing layout to having potentially eight). It has become more of a problem because now most people (including developers) do not run in the mode where scrollbars impact layout. In this case it is further hidden by Finder having four different ways to display contents, and it only being incorrect in one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frixo Cool
I reported this bug soon after installing Tahoe, and Apple asked me to review it again after I install the 26.3 update...not sure if that means I was one of the first people to report it or there's something unique about my MacStudio. I'll be sure to note the issues pointed out here if they appear for me after the update. Tahoe does seem to have more than the usual number of quirks in the GUI...I was hoping that Liquid Glass on Mac would take us back towards Aqua, which I still think was the best computer interface I've ever used, maybe it will get there with some more work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
QuickTime is another example, it feels like a relic from decades ago. Why hasn’t Apple replaced it with a modern, unified “Video Player” app? What person born after year 2000 knows what "Quicktime" is? There are still many legacy elements throughout macOS that make the system feel dated, especially when compared to the polish and cohesion of iPadOS.
?? I wish they would go back to QuickTime 7 Pro, including the design which is so effective for making quick edits and exporting to any format of one's choice, saving a reference of the file without creating a whole new full copy etc.

Sadly, they modernized it, killing its ability to be super useful to me. It is very clunky in comparison. I still have to go back to Mojave to use QuickTime 7 Pro to this day, to make up for the lack of features etc. with the new QuickTime X, regardless of which version it is.

There is no legacy anything in v10, except the name. That was the problem.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.