Nope. It got 3 years.No, it got 8 years of support.
Nope. It got 3 years.No, it got 8 years of support.
Right, they will probably have a couple more updates and then that will put both the remaining Intel Macs that Apple is currently selling at about 5 years. I would guess that in 2024, all MacOS updates will be Apple Silicon only.Well, they're not quite done actually selling Intel machines. Yes, though, this is a dramatic change. It looks like the cutoff now is in requiring T2 chips.
Nope. The 2017/2019 iMacs don't have T2 chips.Well, they're not quite done actually selling Intel machines. Yes, though, this is a dramatic change. It looks like the cutoff now is in requiring T2 chips.
LOL. Very happy governments are finally stepping in on behalf of consumers and to combat planned obsolescence and reduce electronic waste. Equally happy to watch some people seethe and rage when these laws are passed.Electronic have an EOL. Apple has been far, far too generous with some of their hardware. Finally dropping the 6s, THANK GOD
I kept reminding others this as I wasted thousands of dollars on a loaded G4 Powerbook just to see it quickly abandoned. Too many here think that "supporting intel years to come" meant being able to run the latest MacOS for at least 5 years. Nope you're only getting bug fixes after next year's Macos release.PowerPC support was dropped from OS X with the very next release after the Intel transition was complete. I expect the same to happen with macOS and Apple Silicon. If we get the Mac Pro this fall/winter, then maybe macOS 14 will support a narrow span of the last Intel Macs, but it also wouldn't surprise me if it was Apple Silicon only.
It objectively is. Consumer protection is a responsibility of the EU. Planned obsolescence is a component of consumer protection.No, it’s not. There is zero reason for a governmental body to take interest in when Apple ends support for certain devices, especially when it’s transitioning from one CPU architecture to another. Trying to use governmental power to force Apple to support macOS ad infinitum is just sour grapes and whining at this point. Of course support for Intel-based computers is going to end eventually. Do you think it won’t? That smacks of naivete. Or worse. Stop whining to the government about your sense of entitlement.
Yep, especially if you bought the last generation PM G5. Came with Tiger, and only had Leopard as an OS upgrade and that was it. Snow Leopard was Intel only.As brutal as the obsolesce is (they'll still run monetary security updates for a year or 2), the power pc to intel switch was faster and harder IIRC.
Having gone though the PowerPC to Intel transition and getting the chop at Leopard, this transition is much longer, much more orderly and much kinder than what Apple did before. The level of whining I am hearing here just tells me how spoiled people here are now. I don’t give two sh*ts how much people spent on their Mac, once Apple announced the transition to ASi, people should have understood what was going to happen, especially old timers. Anyone with Google and a concern could have found out how it was handled last time. Or asked us old timers. I’ve been through the 68K to Power PC to Intel to Apple Silicon. Apple is going really slowly and I appreciate that. If you spent $10K on a 2013 Mac Pro in 2018, that’s on you and you either were forced to for your business or you were febrile. That Apple kept selling them along with the 2014 Mac mini and 2015/2017 MacBook Air is on Apple. The fact remains that macOS for Intel is going to be phased out in another 2-3 years at the outset.Why are you so mad that people who bought their devices for $1000+ to even possibly the tune of $10000 and higher are mad that Apple is speeding up the deprecation of their devices? An architectural shift for your new devices increases the speed of deprecation for your older devices... how exactly? The "they have M1/M2 chips now so of course Intel will be left unsupported faster"-argument you're coming with is just not an argument. Never mind that it goes against Apple's entire "but we're eco-friendly" claims. Nobody is arguing that Apple shouldn't have deprecated devices from back in 2014. But that's not what they're doing, is it? There was no reason for people in 2016 up to 2019 to believe that Apple would be planning to deprecate their devices years ahead of what they did previously, even *with* the knowledge that Apple was moving to their own architecture. That's just nuts.
Proving “planned obsolescence” is a nebulous thing at best and is complete subjective. The EU interfering with this smacks of bureaucrats abusing their positions more than consumer protection. I hear that term bandied around here a lot and it has more to do with people who think that when they buy an Apple product they are entitled to it working forever versus a Dell or HP product that I never hear anyone claim “planned obsolescence “ about…EVER!It objectively is. Consumer protection is a responsibility of the EU. Planned obsolescence is a component of consumer protection.
The the MacBook Pro made the PowerBook G4 seem ancient in comparison in a very short time.I kept reminding others this as I wasted thousands of dollars on a loaded G4 Powerbook just to see it quickly abandoned. Too many here think that "supporting intel years to come" meant being able to run the latest MacOS for at least 5 years. Nope you're only getting bug fixes after next year's Macos release.
I’m thinking closer to 2026, but either way, it’s coming to an end. For all the talk by the “tech nerds” on this forum, there seems to be an awful lot of surprised people here that support is ending.Right, they will probably have a couple more updates and then that will put both the remaining Intel Macs that Apple is currently selling at about 5 years. I would guess that in 2024, all MacOS updates will be Apple Silicon only.
I have a 2019 iMac and I’m going to keep using it as long as it physically runs. Same with my 2016 MacBook Pro that got cut this year. I have a 2020 M1 MBP that I spend most of my time working on. I’m using Big Sur on my iMac and Monterey on my 2016 and M1. I’ll keep running whatever the last version is for as long as it keeps running. Or I’ll sell my collection of Intels and move completely to Apple Silicon over the next year or two. We all knew this was coming down the pike after Apple committed to ASi at WWDC 2020.So my 2019 iMac (27 inch) may have a couple more years of new MacOs support. Laughably Apple is offering $625 for it in a buy back. So I don't know what to do... keep plugging along with it or make the jump to Silicon.
Are you running it on Monterey? I’m still getting Catalina Security updates on my 2012 15” rMBP, so I would say yes, you’ll still keep getting security updates.I have an Air 2017, which was given to me by my father in law. I basically only use it for browsing and streaming when I’m away from home. Obviously that’s not compatible with Venture, but would it still receive security updates and the like ? Don’t fancy buying a new one just yet.
Don't be silly. The M1 is complete trash now that the M2 has been launched. Apple doesn't do nostalgia.Really hope they keep supporting the M1 for a while.
Yes. It also still works perfectly fine for my usageAre you running it on Monterey? I’m still getting Catalina Security updates on my 2012 15” rMBP, so I would say yes, you’ll still keep getting security updates.
As long as you’re good with how Monterey works (I’m not, but that’s me), then you should be good to go for as long as you want before you’ll feel compelled to upgrade to Apple Silicon.Yes. It also still works perfectly fine for my usage