I forgot to check this morning. Did the points get adjusted? Or did I pull a 1 point win for the second week in a row?
It's 109-108 in my favor as it stands right now.
I forgot to check this morning. Did the points get adjusted? Or did I pull a 1 point win for the second week in a row?
It's 109-108 in my favor as it stands right now.![]()
You know the league manager can add or take away points if there is a reason to or a need.
I'll start the bidding at $20...![]()
How much are wins, I have deep pockets and a desire to win.
Looks like you got your point adjustment. Congrats on a close one!
You know the league manager can add or take away points if there is a reason to or a need.
I'll start the bidding at $20...![]()
Team jessica (3-4) 85 vs. Dallas MSCRIV (5-2) 127
Team thegoldenmackid (3-4) 101 vs. Pittsburgh imaketouchtheme (4-3) 93
Team rhett7660 (5-2) 167 vs. Team Gauchoholics (3-4) 128
Team fireshot91 (3-4) 82 vs. Team wvuwhat (3-4) 88
Team maflynn (3-4) 115 vs. Team jecapaga (1-6) 70
Berlin Pretzels (5-2) 108 - Bench = 74 vs. miller high life (4-3) 108 - Bench = 40
This could just be because I'm the team that lost out on this, but in the years and years I have been playing fantasy, I have never seen ties dealt with in this way. Just like the NFL, ties should be reflected on the team's record. Why espn does this is just way past me. I mean it doesn't even make sense - half of fantasy is making the right starts, your bench players do not and should not have any relevance at all.
What the hell is up with the trade proposal for Thomas Jones. No way should that be allowed.
That's me. Honestly I haven't been invested in this at all since I wasn't able to be home and draft so I got what I got, so to speak.
And this week's second highest scorer was gauchoholics, who unfortunately for him was playing the highest scorer.![]()
Lets hope my duo and Adrian comes back for another week!!!
What the hell is up with the trade proposal for Thomas Jones. No way should that be allowed.
That's me. Honestly I haven't been invested in this at all since I wasn't able to be home and draft so I got what I got, so to speak.
After reviewing the particulars this trade has been ruled too one-sided to be allowed and has been vetoed by League Manager mscriv. I've got to veto this guys based on player values and the fact that it is being disputed by others in the league. I now understand that you are not paying attention Jecapaga and I'm disappointed to hear that. If you are still open to making trades despite your non-interest in managing your team that's okay, but those trades must be legit in order to be fair to everyone else in the league who is paying attention. If you guys can rework the trade where it is more appropriate based on player values then I will be more than happy to approve it. I'm not very strict on trades and usually don't like to make these kind of decisions because it's not always easy to decide player values based on different owner's playing styles and needs. However, in this case I can only judge based on player value because Jecapaga has openly stated that he is not invested and therefore is not even taking his team's needs into account.
Oh, I hate you all. Gah, I need a new RB. Any trades for any of my current RBs (Preferably Shonn Greene), and TEs?
Well Miller High Life wins this tie, I would have voted for just leaving ties as ties, but not now...
No, I lost the tie (for the second week in a row). I had 10 bench points to your 66.
What are the chances that this would happen twice in a row?
Dallas MSCRIV (6-2) 131 vs. Berlin Pretzels (5-3) 107
Team wvuwhat (4-4) 97 vs. Team maflynn (3-5) 95
Team fireshot91 (3-5) 68 vs. Team rhett7660 (6-2) 129
Team Gauchoholics (4-4) 74 vs. Team jecapaga (1-7) 37
Pittsburgh imaketouchtheme (4-4) 68 vs. Team jessica (4-4) 72
Team thegoldenmackid (4-4) 119 - Bench = 66 vs. miller high life (4-4) 119 - Bench = 10