This comment reminds me of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_ESeEZD_OY
Are the Apple Store people so scary to deal with????
Technically, adding a thin insulating coat to it would still be a hardware revision, though. A very, very minor one, but a revision nonetheless.As for the current design, apple COULD add a small change such as a coat or insulator to ease the pain but it CANT redesign without going through all the stages again and getting FCC approval.
It would obviously have to be a very minor change since a major redesign isn't made in months. Then again, perhaps the Zetas are forcing this guy to say this or else. For me? Not a true rumor.
I hope there is a change in the hardware, if only to shut the smug Apple fanboys up.
Where are all the naysayers now?
Antenna dipped in some sort of coating is most likely the fix.
I hope there is a change in the hardware, if only to shut the smug Apple fanboys up.
it's interesting.. me and my wife both have iPhone 4 and my 2 other bros have iPhone 4 as well. We all haven't experienced any drop calls here in Vancouver for the last 1 month. This antenna thing is blown out of proportion in my opinion.
I am on my 7th iPhone 4, I basically swap whenever the screen gets dirty and cite the proximity sensor issue.
IF there is a hardware revision I will be up to number 8.
Rock on Jobs
But if they make the change, what will the smug Apple-haters have to complain about?
I hope there is a change in the hardware, if only to shut the smug Apple fanboys up.
I call BS. Apple Stores all have WiFi, so if you "were" browsing the net, you would not have hampered by holding the phone in any position you liked as it would not have relied on the cellular signal at all. Wanna try again?
I hope there is a change in the hardware, if only to shut the smug Apple fanboys up.
Mark Booth said:iPhone 4 owners are a neurotic bunch!
Mark
That's absolutely not what that EU guideline is about. This specific guideline (199/44/EG) is about warranty when something breaks or does not work as advertised. What you're talking about is something completely different and has got more to do with e-commerce.Actually - that's wrong. You have a window after purchasing a device (normally stated by the retailer) to return a product as faulty (or more specifically "not fit for purpose"), if after this time you return the product and it functions as at date of purchase, you have no case to claim. This is not the same as a product guarantee or a warranty, both of which refer to parts and functionality and would only entitle you to repair, replacement or possible refund/credit note if the damage wasn't caused by end-user action.
Otherwise, every consumer in Europe would trade in their "faulty/old" device for every new product revision free of charge ad infinitum.
That's what I would have expected as well at first. But on further consideration, there is likely a reason for the antenna to be around the bottom and it is called FCC: your brain would be grilled too much if the antenna was closer to the top. Already with the current design the iPhone 4 has a rather high SAR value as compared to for example the Nexus One.In my opinion the whole frame is gonna be rotated with the antenna going to the top of the phone, with a consequent rearranging of components inside...I predicted and suggested this a few months ago on the Apple Support forums...![]()