The remaining building fell away from the existing pile enough that it gave the rescuers more ways to see inside. Heavier equipment brought in for faster excavation.
Well, I guess you didn’t mention the reason why that was though. That’s because they had to start making more progress on the building excavation due to inclement weather, which was widely reported that if there was any possible survivors, they wanted to make headway before they were delayed with storms.The remaining building fell away from the existing pile enough that it gave the rescuers more ways to see inside. Heavier equipment brought in for faster excavation.
Thank you for the clarification.Well, I guess you didn’t mention the reason why that was though. That’s because they had to start making more progress on the building excavation due to inclement weather, which was widely reported that if there was any possible survivors, they wanted to make headway before they were delayed with storms.
While the residents of the still standing part of the building weren't allowed in, I read somewhere that the city did have a team going thru the units and quickly grabbing potentially important stuff......but there were no details in the article as to how the effort was organized or exactly what was being collected.Yes and it fell down just the way they wanted it to. It made me want to watch more demolition videos. I wished and hoped they would’ve been able to extract some of the remaining alive or their bodies and have the residents of the remaining portion able to get their belongings.
... since each unit is owned, is there a master owner of the building or does it fall on the association etc?
The unit owners should be compensated through the master insurance, which would cover their percentage interest of the building loss (i.e., for their particular unit) but not for personal possessions, furnishings or other contents of the dwelling. If the particular unit owners also carry condo insurance that should cover their personal possessions and dwelling contents.I am still curious if there will be any one held liable in the legal sense and if so who? I am not to familiar with condo's and the laws that govern them, but I am curious, since each unit is owned, is there a master owner of the building or does it fall on the association etc?
The unit owners should be compensated through the master insurance, which would cover their percentage interest of the building loss (i.e., for their particular unit) but not for personal possessions, furnishings or other contents of the dwelling. If the particular unit owners also carry condo insurance that should cover their personal possessions and dwelling contents.
In terms of negligence or wrongful death -- I do not think they will have much luck seeking compensation because they need to find a party to hold responsible. The building was 40 years old so they builder probably does not even exist and this case looks to be more of a building maintenance neglect issue rather than a typical building defect type of issue. They likely cannot sue the government for lack of oversight either unless some fraud occurred somewhere in the process. They can try to sue the condo association but that is akin to just trying to sue themselves so that is unlikely to bear fruit either.
I wonder why the building owner didn't fix these problems like ten-plus years ago.
The Champlain Towers South condo association approved a $15 million assessment in April to complete repairs required under the county's 40-year recertification process, according to documents obtained by CNN.
The documents show that more than two years after association members received a report about "major structural damage" in the building, they began the assessment process to pay for necessary repairs.
Owners would have to pay assessments ranging from $80,190 for one-bedroom units to $336,135 for the owner of the building's four-bedroom penthouse, a document sent to the building's residents said. The deadline to pay upfront or choose paying a monthly fee lasting 15 years was July 1.
What a tragic situation. I purchased a condo a few years ago, lived in it for three years and then sold it. Never again. Too much conflict between the management company and owners, between various owners, between resident owners and renters etc. Some owners wanted to spend lavishly, some didn't want to spend 5 cents and on and on.