Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
They have. I guarantee that Apple has fully functional page layout and photo-editing software on par and beyond Adobe ready for market at the flip of a switch. Most likely based on Pages on steroids and their video editing suites.

You guarantee this... ok, well that settles that.

Well, at least both of those companies have one thing in common -- they both make COMPLETE CRAP.

However, this is exactly why Apple should have bought Adobe years ago.

If Adobe makes "crap", then why would you want Apple to buy them?
 
Well your clearly an idiot.. First of all the industry standard is Photoshop and Illustrator. Just like the industry standard for word & excel is Microsoft Office.. Second of all us designers have been using Photoshop and Illustrator for years, there is no other software around that offers the same amount of features and flexibility. You think just because Apple decides to not support Adobe we should learn new software and applications all over again?

Your an idiot :p

Also I'm an awesome designer and I know it. I wouldn't have any trouble getting hired. My works are among the best. Infact I was the best designer out of all the students in my Media class... Your saying "Your a bad designer", based on what? I rely on tools? All designers do, some prefer other tools over the one I use.. but most of us rely on Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator. I've used CorelDraw, Fireworks, Jasc Paint Shop Pro.. I've used all of them.. none of them compare to Adobe Photoshop..

correction the industry standards are not the software but the files they create, jpegs, tiffs, pngs, eps etc etc.....

I could use gimp to do a job and the files created could be used by any layout package, I could use inkscape and the eps's it produces would be printable on any press.

Though at present I'd rather use AI or PS I'd rather use anything on a Mac than switch to a PC and all the hassle that brings.
 
MSFT buying Adobe wouldn't be a merger, it would be a acquisition. Mergers happen with equally sized companies.
 
ROFLMAO!

How to kill two birds with a single stone?

Let Adobe Merger with Microsoft.

Of course the SEC won't let it happen, but Apple could take them out in one fell swoop and we would see the end of Flash!
 
Microsoft, if it really wanted to could destory a good proportion of Apple's user base:

Microsoft buys Adobe, immediately discontinues all Apple products...
* Destroy Apple's creative base virtually overnight with no realistic competitor to Photoshop.
* No MS Office - destroy a good proportion of small business user base - there is OpenOffice but when you need to rely on 100% compatibility, its just not there. iWork is too limited.
How often does Microsoft leave that much money on the table just out of spite, though?
 
If MS and Adobe merge the Mac versions of Adobe software are gonna die a slow death and we'll only see Windows versions in the future. SUCKS.
 
Sounds like they are just trying to hold onto their legacy, instead of making way for the future.

This is exactly my thought. Flash has years left in it and Microsoft's Office is still the standard although they really don't like the way Google is getting people to think about alternatives.

Adobe does look like a company that has been b*tched slapped by Apple and now it has gone to get the goon like neighbor to fight for them. I'm not sure a merger would be contested by the Feds, Microsoft still dominates the desktop but unfortunately for them that is not where today's money is and future growth. Adobe is still a small company compared to Google and Apple. M$ would never buy Adobe if there wasn't something there they needed. Kill Flash for Silverlight the way Adobe killed Golive for Dreamweaver, etc.. when they purchased Macromedia. That would be sweet.
 
It's a bit sad what the mass media is perceiving about this. Adobe isn't all Flash, at all. They've got the best possible suite of creative products (InDesign, Illustrator, Premiere Pro, After Effects) and the company would be loosing a lot more intangible assets than what meets the eye if a merger were to happen between Microsoft.
 
Not surprised. Apple rejected flash support on iOS devices, why would you want to be involved with a company that doesn't support what you offer..

It'll be really interesting to see what Apple does when the new Blackberry Playbook is released. Because you can view websites the same way you can on a desktop, full flash support.

I don't know about you guys but I consume flash content every day.. I love Apple but the decision made to not include Adobe Flash sucked. Instead of being able to watch videos streaming on websites other then youtube you have download and convert etc.. which is a pain.. Infact I'm stuck doing just that everyday for my ipod touch.. I like to watch videos when in bed..

Anyway It would be kinda of funny to see if Apple eventually does adopt the flash player, just because the PlayBook has.. still I doubt it..

I know that HTML5 is the new standard, but I've said it before and saying it again, the transition is not going to happen overnight, it'll take a few years if not more.. A lot of websites rely on flash. Why not support Adobe Flash + HTML5, support for all websites now and the new ones that are coming.

Flash is dead dude, get over it. The Blackberry Playbook has no apps...the Ipad has over 8 million sold and over 30,000 apps that are Ipad specific.

The Ipad 2 will blow any other tablet out of the water.

The Playbook does not even have 3G! Its wifi only. And nobody knows what the price it yet.

Apple could drop the price of the Ipad 2 to less than $400...and nobody would be able to compete.
 
the same way I stay away from Microsoft products would be the same way I'd say away from Adobe if these 2 merged.
 
Office sharing the renderer with the rest of the CS suite (this is the superior strength of the CS suite compared to other solutions) would be phenomenal.

The word spacing and breaking algorithms of Indesign, the Video components of AE and Premiere, the vector capabilities of Illustrator, the edge detection and manipulation as shown in PS, Trapwise, and AE.

...

Integrating and making the workflow better and easier is much multiyear work. Exploding to even greater utilization of the products suites world wide. This is good for Microsoft, this is good for people that want to make their lives easier.
You expect Microsoft to integrate Adobe's stuff with Office? Microsoft can't even properly integrate their own stuff with Office. Microsoft, as an entity, is an empire of little software kingdoms that don't get along with each other, and Adobe would just be another one of those.
 
Adobe is looking for a life raft

Adobe is a dying company that needs to radically re-invent itself if it wants to survive.

Where is their growth going to come from in the next five years?

It's not like there are a lot of design studios out there wondering whether or not they should use Adobe products. So there are limited opportunities for new markets.

The software itself has basically become a user interface that is layered on top of Apple's Open GL engine. There are dozens of smaller software makers working the low-end disruption angle against Adobe.

Look at Pixelmator. As powerful as Photoshop? ... No way; but it's a great interface for executing 99% of the tasks that MOST people buy and use Photoshop for and it only costs 60 bucks not $500.

There are others out there too.

So yes, Adobe products may end up with a place in the high-end market for people doing crazy image editing. But high-end technology markets don't last, they get absorbed and overthrown by better, cheaper alternatives.

So where does Adobe go?

SAAS? Maybe. But I don't see them having the culture for it. They aren't Google. Even Apple has a hard time providing services in the cloud. It's just not their space.

The Video codec play that Flash had going is effectively dead thanks to the big push off the cliff from Apple and the adoption rates of H.264 and other open-ish technologies.

The only option really then is to develop a platform-based solution which is what Flash-Flex is supposed to be. But Adobe's business model is all wrong for it. People don't buy development platforms in $2000 software bundles off the shelves.

Recent acquisitions like Omniture to me shows a company that doesn't know where its future should be.
 
and two companies running scared.

You have that right. Like two people falling off a cliff holding on to each other. If anything, they will save some operating costs and extend the bleeding time.

If anything shows we are in a post-PC era of the technology business, this is it.
 
Microsoft could do that now if they wanted. PDF is a documented, open standard which is why Apple can do Quartz which is effectively Display PDF.
It's already included with Microsoft Office since 2007 via plug-in and default in 2010. I can just imagine all the past RAGE from either Adobe or possibly the EU.

It's just annoying to have to still bolt on Adobe Reader for something so mundane when every other OS gets away with it all the time.
 
I see a lot of complaints about iwork... What's wrong with it? It seems very fast and good to me, what am I missing?
 
This is a very good thing. This, people, is competition heating up. If other companies get their act together and this turns into a knock down drag out fight, we as consumers will win.
 
Flash is dead dude, get over it....

yeah.

Dead.

Dead as in:
85% of Fortune 500 companies use it on their sites, thousands of companies have invested millions of dollars developing e-learning apps with it, 75% of all video on the web is delivered with it.

Dead.

Because you said so.
 
yeah.

Dead.

Dead as in:
85% of Fortune 500 companies use it on their sites, thousands of companies have invested millions of dollars developing e-learning apps with it, 75% of all video on the web is delivered with it.

Dead.

Because you said so.

Flash is the Gasoline of the internet. Damn near everything uses it. There are alternatives of course, but they wont be mainstream for years to come.
 
But high-end technology markets don't last, they get absorbed and overthrown by better, cheaper alternatives.

Um no they don't. They just get entrenched in businesses and never change because everyone's used to the way it works.

Unless you're talking about the consumer market, then you might have a point.
 
yeah.

Dead.

Dead as in:
85% of Fortune 500 companies use it on their sites, thousands of companies have invested millions of dollars developing e-learning apps with it, 75% of all video on the web is delivered with it.

Dead.

Because you said so.

No - you don't get it! Microsoft and Adobe are dead! So is Google! Their combined $400 billion market cap and $100 billion in revenue is nothing! Apple will be the only company left within five - no, make that three - years.

Walmart, Exxon, Crox, Keebler, Slinky, Trojan - all dead, dead, dead! iProducts will replace them all.
 
Easy, as much as I like Mac I like Photoshop a lot better. Without Photoshop for Mac my 2010 MP, 2009 mini and 2008 MBP sales would have never occurred. My iPhone syncs just fine on iTunes for Windows.

Try using PS or AI on a windows platform, it's not pleasant.

Designers don't want to have to get geeky, they want and need software and hardware that gets on with the job and doesn't blow up in their face at 3am when your deadline is 6am.....

Adobe does produce the best software for designers, but it's not hard to see a replacement taking my money in the not to distant future.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.