Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why all the Zune talk..

A lot of Apple fans easily forget that Microsoft's last hardware venture wasn't the Zune but the Kinect which just so happens to be the fastest selling consumer electronics device in history out performing any Apple device.

Competition is good and congrats Microsoft.
 
Apple has something that makes MS afraid, the ears of Corp IT. More and more Apple products are been used in Corp. MS does not like this, this is 80% or so of where their profit comes from. Google has nothing to offer here right now. Now if Apple was to gain a leg up in Corp, imagine what damage they could do to MS if OS X servers started to pop up and IT liked it.

Not really , on the contrary even. Apple has given up most of the devices it had in the coorporate market and shows no sign to integrate itself.
Even the non mac pro upgrade is a sign of that.

The only thing you see is some of the ipads being integrated or people using iphones or if its allowed (bring you ownd evide policies) macbooks.


Google on the other other hand with its google apps cloud service is stealing away exchange/office customers



No apple is of no concern to MS in this market and there are little signs they want to enter it .
 
That's what I said, nearly 3 years

It doesn't answer my question because that's not what you said. You said that it just came out "the other day" you didn't say or imply in the least about enterprise. And why would you? That has absolutely nothing to do with what our conversation was about.

Try and keep your story straight (and honest) so you don't have to change it.

It's good you're not wasting your time anymore. Why would you on failed arguments anyway?

I didn't have to deal with it until recently, as nobody wanted it before. so even if it came out 2.5 years ago, it didn't matter to me. it's like it didn't exist.

Didn't you read what I said before? Didn't you read the links?

Go to bed, so you don't sleep in class and miss on your education.
 
Agreed, though it would be silly to compare the iPad to the x86 version. Too different and the x86 would be far more capable. With the exception of perhaps battery life.

Yeah, but the form factor alone is going to draw comparison. Shame really, because some people don't understand exactly what this thing is. If you're a photographer or an artist, anyone who uses Photoshop extensively really, this thing is a godsend. As long as it allows for a goodly bit of ram, it's got the oomph to handle higher end apps fairly well.

Fairly well. A beefy laptop could do better.

But what about using as an iPad style tablet? Even as light as it is, it's still too heavy to be considered a good "media consumption" machine. Plus you have to consider the battery life. It's possible Intel and MS were able to pull off a miracle, and somehow managed to get the battery to last for 5-6 hours in all but the heaviest workloads. But even then, it's not as good as an iPad.

...which makes me think this'll be the biggest problem with the x86 Surface. Is it good enough to please everyone? It might end up being a merely decent enough jack of all trades type machine. Good enough to do alright in a variety of situations, but not as good as larger laptops or simpler tablets. MS doesn't want a whole load of people going "you know, it's pretty good. But I kinda wish I got X or Y instead of this". The old chesnut "being damned by faint praises" comes to mind here.

To me, this looks like the biggest hurdle the Surface has to pass.
 
I think they will succeed, if nothing more because of their enterprise support. That said, I also think that iPad has established Apple as a true player.

Apple are strong in the consumer market for sure. The problem with Apple, is that they've always treated the enterprise market in the same way they treat everyone: "you either do it our way, or f'#k off". Enterprise simply doesn't work like that. Their treatment of Mac Pro users and Final Cut professionals pretty much shows their true colors when it comes to the corporate market.

That's why Microsoft are content to still support a 10 year old OS, whereas Apple barely even seem to care about their current OS and spend most of their time talking about what the next one will be.

Each approach works well in their respective markets.
 
It's midnight. Need to get up for work at 6. Must.... get.... some.... sleep....

*Terminator* I'll be back.
 

"Insulting a man's"... computer ..."be worse than insulting his mother!"

----------

Here's what the vent looks like: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/gadgetlab/2012/06/MicrosoftEvent15.jpg

It's almost impossible to accidentally to cover it, but one has to wonder how it'll work under a blanket. Or if it's turned on while in a backpack. I think the processor will automatically clocks itself down, and worst-case turn itself off.

This is why I would rather get the thinner, lighter, and without vent version - the Windows RT.

I'm also worried about water. I've gotten drops of water on my iPod touch and iPhone 4 without problems, but getting water in the vent would be fatal. Food would also clog it up real badly, but getting food on an iPad can at worst make your cleanable dock connector dirty.
 
Impressed with a kickstand? Lol!

Well, i was referring to all the features it supposedly comes with in the commercial. If things come the way it looks, then its seems rather nice to already have a forum of ease of use typing, as well as a simpler way with propping up the tablet without the need of additional accessories.

Sad that the commercial doesnt really state what else it has.
 
I actually think that this is the tablet that will grab over 50% of the iPad sales. I can't wait to get my hands on this. I hope it will cost less than $500. That would be a killer price if the price is just below the iPad.

Who else is going to make the switch? I sure am. Hopefully this won't be another HP Touchpad fad that did not survive.

how do you gather it will grab >50% iPad sales? In 10 years maybe it will sell more than the iPad 2. But in one year? No way. Not at $500. Not at $499. Perhaps $399, on par with iPad 2 16GB. But then, if apple drops iPad 2 to $199 or iPad 3 to $399 when iPad 4 is out, that's even stiffer competition. Let's not forget the flurry of android devices even lower pricing than any iPad.
 
Everything (well most) of what we wanted in the iPad 2 we got in the 3, I can't imagine a minor spec bump for the 4. If this doesn't drive apple to make an even better iPad I really don't know what will. Not that apple likes to use the market as indication but like I said a minor spec bump won't do it this time. Obviously most of us would still buy it regardless but I'm just saying lmao.
 
The keyboard integration is far from elegant.

It's not lap friendly for one, which is a big deal. Also, what about portrait and that kickstand?

The logictech solution is much nicer on the iPad.
 
well, apple strives to keep things ultra small, lightweight, and powerful, all at the same time reducing heat, noise, and increasing battery life.
Ah so the last ipad (wich I bought btw) was a failure then?



If you put in vents in order to cool, then perhaps you shouldn't make it so powerful to the point it needs active cooling fans?

Why? With his logic an imac or macbook shouldnt have cooling vents .

This is the same pointless argument as thiness .

Power consumption, noise, weight those are important things.

What are you going to be doing on this thing that requires that much cooling?
A tegra 3 doesnt require that much cooling, and i5 does .

Of course if you need to cool something with fans, you know that thing is using a lot of power. Sure you can't hear the fans on with a lot of ambient noise, but when you and the tablet are alone in a room without any sounds, you don't want to hear your tablet whirring away either.

No thats a step too far. And seeing my wife complain about her new ipad getting to warm to her liking I wished apple had introduces such a vent to get rid of the excess heat.
 
I didn't have to deal with it until recently, as nobody wanted it before. so even if it came out 2.5 years ago, it didn't matter to me. it's like it didn't exist.

Didn't you read what I said before? Didn't you read the links?

Go to bed, so you don't sleep in class and miss on your education.

What matters to you is irrelevant, as are your links as it relates to this thread. You said it came out the other day, you're wrong. You then changed your story to something that wasn't even part of the discussion. You then said you were going to leave and here you are "wasting" your time again. Can you keep ANY one of your stories straight? Just one?

I can tell you're getting upset, no one to blame but yourself for your own bad story telling. At least now you know there are impartial members at mac rumors that will call you out on BS.
 
Windows 7 was launched on October 22, 2009, about 2.5 years from now, but it didn't start to get widely adopted in the Enterprise until very recently, just a few months ago.
Here's one link, if you want more, google ot yourself:
http://thenextweb.com/microsoft/201...nce-despite-windows-8-looming-on-the-horizon/

Now, compare it to how long Windows XP has been the promary Windows choice for over 10 years. Microsoft had to pressure Windows XP users to upgrade:
http://www.brighthub.com/computing/windows-platform/articles/126642.aspx

I hope the above answers your questions. Sorry but I am no longer wasting my time trying to make you reason. Before you rush a senseless comment, use your brain or find facts. If you can't come up to my level to rationally discuss something, don't bother; talk to someone else instead.

I think the light's burnt out. Great source.:rolleyes: So Windows 7 is just starting to be adopted by enterprise? Wow, that means they sold a half a billion copies to consumers alone!
 
how do you gather it will grab >50% iPad sales? In 10 years maybe it will sell more than the iPad 2. But in one year? No way. Not at $500. Not at $499. Perhaps $399, on par with iPad 2 16GB. But then, if apple drops iPad 2 to $199 or iPad 3 to $399 when iPad 4 is out, that's even stiffer competition. Let's not forget the flurry of android devices even lower pricing than any iPad.

Yes, but you forgot one thing that I also forgot. Microsoft publishes some very popular games..............................
 
The keyboard integration is far from elegant.

It's not lap friendly for one, which is a big deal. Also, what about portrait and that kickstand?

The logictech solution is much nicer on the iPad.

How much typing have you done on the Surface keyboard?
 
This is the beginning of the end for the iPad and Apple.

hahahahah, you made my morning dude! I'm not saying it's bad that MS is trying, they should and it's good to have a competition but I'm quite sure it's not going to be that hot to endanger iPad. Look at the number of Apps for iPad, look at the numbers of how many iPad's is out there and it's growing rapidly...

How about to think a bit before you hit "Submit Reply" ? :)
 
No one has as many apps as iOS. What the Surface needs are some good quality apps at launch.

If they made this thing a gaming powerhouse and allowed an actual tactile controller (any bluetooth controller) to work with it natively, this would be selling well no doubt. That's the biggest gripe about iOS - the lack of any real controller. You can only ***** touch the screen so much when playing games. Most of the fun games are really limited by the stupid touch screen controls.
And now steve-o has gone so I hope someone at apple has enough balls to actually create an api for gaming controllers. These stupid restrictions makes apple look like sony.
 
Yeah, but the form factor alone is going to draw comparison. Shame really, because some people don't understand exactly what this thing is. If you're a photographer or an artist, anyone who uses Photoshop extensively really, this thing is a godsend. As long as it allows for a goodly bit of ram, it's got the oomph to handle higher end apps fairly well.

Fairly well. A beefy laptop could do better.

But what about using as an iPad style tablet? Even as light as it is, it's still too heavy to be considered a good "media consumption" machine. Plus you have to consider the battery life. It's possible Intel and MS were able to pull off a miracle, and somehow managed to get the battery to last for 5-6 hours in all but the heaviest workloads. But even then, it's not as good as an iPad.

...which makes me think this'll be the biggest problem with the x86 Surface. Is it good enough to please everyone? It might end up being a merely decent enough jack of all trades type machine. Good enough to do alright in a variety of situations, but not as good as larger laptops or simpler tablets. MS doesn't want a whole load of people going "you know, it's pretty good. But I kinda wish I got X or Y instead of this". The old chesnut "being damned by faint praises" comes to mind here.

To me, this looks like the biggest hurdle the Surface has to pass.

I have no doubt the battery life on the Pro won't be anywhere near the iPads. The pro is like an evolution of the Asus EEE Slate. Good concept, poor execution. Win 7 just wasn't fun to use on a tablet, and the unit ran hot, heavy and poor battery life. The Pro looks to improve on all those fronts. Time will tell if it improves them enough.
 
well, apple strives to keep things ultra small, lightweight, and powerful, all at the same time reducing heat, noise, and increasing battery life.

If you put in vents in order to cool, then perhaps you shouldn't make it so powerful to the point it needs active cooling fans? What are you going to be doing on this thing that requires that much cooling? Of course if you need to cool something with fans, you know that thing is using a lot of power. Sure you can't hear the fans on with a lot of ambient noise, but when you and the tablet are alone in a room without any sounds, you don't want to hear your tablet whirring away either.

Some of the iMac G3s did not have cooling fans. I doubt this fan will be loud or annoying at all, but it puts the tablet at risk. Stuff falling into the vent is not good.
 
It says a lot about the product when people aren't even allowed to touch it, as noted on Engadget's video:

http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/18/hands-on-with-microsoft-surface-for-windows-rt/

Exactly the opposite principles of Apple who encourage you to explore... Still a good effort I guess, but it's kinda pointless without any specifications

Yes apple does let people play with the devices months before they are released, thank god else we would have endless of thread that speculate what will be released.

It never amazes me how people can just write something down without thinking .
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.