Ugh! Why does Microsoft let him touch a mic? Microsoft could come out with a total game changer, like a computer than can read thoughts and do things before you ask it to, but Ballmer could make it seem so droll and unexciting not even the biggest MS fanboy could muster more than a meh.
He's just not a good presenter, granted comparing him to Jobs who could get on stage, sell you a plate of poop and have you asking for seconds, expensive poop at that, probably isn't fair. But even as a CEO it seems Microsoft could be in much better hands than this guy.
He's almost cringe-worthy to watch there and, not that the world needs to be about beauty and whatnot but he's not pleasant to look at either, one can't help think "man, this guy has got to seriously work on his diet."
The HP Slate thing I thought seemed kinda cool, but not in Ballmer's hands as much.
And yeah, I tend to concur with others, his rehashing of existing MS products which, honestly, are good, but great? I mean, it felt like a pandering sales pitch and one that either everyone has already heard or the way he does it was a really bad infomercial. When I read the reactions of even the very Microsoft-paid-for and/or usually fanboyism petty much all doing what Apple fanboys do after some of Jobs keynotes where, similar, he's got nothing to really say or present, doing the "um, that was it?" It means perhaps Microsoft would be better keeping Monkey Boy in the cage and just manning their booth with more competent spokespeople.