Can we just skip this nonsense?
It's a big iPod Touch?
HP choosing Slate as a name is clearly them staking ground on an name which Apple may have been planning to use. ie iSlate. which they bought the domain and company of. as well as trademark.
HP is a notoriously nasty company to deal with behind the scenes. they only care about themselves, never ever any partners or outside companies. HP's corporate environment is really just about devouring any of their vendors and development partners.
At any steps along the way, they will try to co-opt opportunities for themselves and steal ideas or even entire businesses and models. they assume it is less costly to defend lawsuits than to pay for things or deal with partners. well except maybe a company like microsoft.
anyway... just my 2 cents.
I'm sure it's a revolution then.I would guess that more so than a big Iphone? lol
I'm sure it's a revolution then.
You mean an OS based on Mac OS X, and adapted for a touch screen interface, which was not created with keyboard or stylus input in mind, and which is cut down to run on less powerful processors and provide long battery life on a portable device? An OS like Mobile OS X?
As far as I'm concerned the worst thing about the HP slate is that it runs full Windows, with all the problems that brings. Even Ballmer had trouble using it in his keynote. Glomming on some touch-screen gestures to a desktop OS does not make for a satisfying experience with a mobile device, and leaves you with interfaces designed for something else entirely.
Perhaps you want more control over which apps you can install, or have other criticisms of iPhone OS (fair enough, as far as they go), but don't imagine for a minute that desktop apps can magically be ported to a portable device with the same interface and behaviour without producing a sucky device full of compromises. Better to be using iPhone apps on a bigger screen (with a tweaked UI), than desktop apps on a smaller screen, and if you disagree with (say) app store policy, disagree with that, rather than demanding something that cannot work.
If you want a full desktop experience on a portable, just buy one of those hideous frankentablets which has a keyboard or a netbook and be done with it. It's all about the interface, which is something you completely miss when talking about a 'true' OS.
They are, in fact, precisely the same form factor and stand. There are an infinite number of ways to design and style the bezel and stand. If you don't see that those two look the same in a way in which the following (for example) don't, you're a liar:
http://www.theinquirer.net/img/1177/dell_monitor.jpg
http://benchmarkreviews.com/images/reviews/monitors/Samsung_245BW/Samsung_SyncMaster_245BW_Back.jpg
You just described Google.![]()
Agreed SDKing the Apple TV and allowing the ipod/iphone/islate to be the controller is the best idea I've heard in a while and could actually make Apple compete with game consoles as well as add huge interest in the Apple TV generally (just think of the possibilities). I wonder to what extent their distribution contracts with the movie and tv studios is what has prevented that from happening so far.
Make it happen by pestering Apple to do so. Go to and tell them you want it:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/appletv.html
...and your claim is that the HP is a rip-off of the G5 iMac? Even the current iMac's stand doesn't offer height adjustment like the HP monitor's stand, so your claim that they are "precisely the same stand" is incorrect. You're ridiculous.
Except, of course, that the HP you just pointed to is not either of the two HPs that were originally pictured in the thread. Nice attempt at deception there. Pathetic.
Of course HP has some other things that are not Apple clones. Their goal is to sell anything to anyone so they cover a very wide variety. That wasn't the issue at hand.
I know it's pobably not going to be able to run PS or Illustrator but would it be too much to ask to include the capability to connect it to your lap/desk top as a drawing tablet? Either through wifi or cable.
Weren't we just waiting for Microsoft hours ago? I'm waiting for Computex next.The one thing the MS didn't want has come to pass:
The tech world is now waiting on Apple.
Here's a summary of the first 16 pages for everyone who is just joining the conversation and is too lazy to read them all.
- Microsoft sucks
- The HP slate is a copy from the Apple iSlate
- No, the Apple slate doesn't and won't exist
- Apple FTW. The iSlate is going to be a hit even if it is not.. Huh??
- Steve Jobs is dead and Ballmer ate him
- Ballmer was dressed like a golf retirement community network administrator
- The iSlate will run iPod OS
- The iSlate will run full OS X
- What can the iSlate do?
- All of this: insert pink elefants and unicorns here..
- Repeat the above.
Using it as a tablet is definite possibility...
But PS is guaranteed as it already runs (albeit in a very rudimentary way) on the iPhone.
I can't wait to start using multi touch music programmes
Sitar-me do!
Yeah pretty much. MacRumors is a disgrace and gives Apple users a really bad name.
Slate versus iSlate?
This is getting tedious and the products haven't even hit the market yet.
Yeah pretty much. MacRumors is a disgrace and gives Apple users a really bad name.