Is it possible the new Tablet could kill the Macbook line, take the name, and sit at the $999 price tag with the discount for the people in college like me?
Unless it runs full blown OS X, I don't think it will kill the Macbook line.
Is it possible the new Tablet could kill the Macbook line, take the name, and sit at the $999 price tag with the discount for the people in college like me?
Unless it runs full blown OS X, I don't think it will kill the Macbook line.
If Apple has already made inroads with content providers, I can see them OWNING college campuses with a slate device.
Imagine the students grabbing their textbooks via a "book store" within iTunes. Heck, maybe they could even rent them for the semester instead of buying them to save the students some $$$.
Taken a step further, perhaps the e-texts could also have a social aspect whereby students can take notes in class (virtual stickies/dogears) and have them shared amongst classmates, etc.
Plus, with no keyboard the class experience might be a bit better in that there'd be no clicky-clacky typing, and no vertical screens blocking the students (and teachers) eye contact.
-BL
If Apple has already made inroads with content providers, I can see them OWNING college campuses with a slate device.
Imagine the students grabbing their textbooks via a "book store" within iTunes. Heck, maybe they could even rent them for the semester instead of buying them to save the students some $$$.
Taken a step further, perhaps the e-texts could also have a social aspect whereby students can take notes in class (virtual stickies/dogears) and have them shared amongst classmates, etc.
Plus, with no keyboard the class experience might be a bit better in that there'd be no clicky-clacky typing, and no vertical screens blocking the students (and teachers) eye contact.
-BL
Same vision.
No hardware keyboard means I'd need pen input. I can't imagine a way to comfortably type on a virtual screen on a flat device like that.
Yes, this would be a great device for the classroom instead of walking around a large campus with 4+ books in a backpack. You can just grad your tablet and be off to class. Also, I remembered that I spent $400+ per semester for
8 semesters which comes to $3200+.
Now, it should be easy for Apple to integrate new content (i.e. e-books) that can be both rented and purchased. They do this now with video. Next, if a student can access university library content via the tablet, it makes being able to go to the library without actually going. I believe Google is currently copying books that are out of print but publishers will have another medium to distribute their books.
Lastly, several universities in the US record videos of the lectures for later review or make the video streams available in realtime. This has the possibility of kicking the schools and universities into the future and I believe seeing many episodes of Star Trek where they used something very similar to a tablet in both the academy and on the various duty stations.
Give me a 10" flat slate, that I can hold up with one hand like I currently hold a novel open, and an interaction surface parallel to my body instead of at right angles, and I'll be first in the line. I can *finally* read my daily quota of sites and newspapers in bed comfortably.
I have never seen the point of a tablet, regardless of who makes it.
I do feel sorry for Mr. Balmer. He remains waiting for that first epiphanous moment when he will actually have an original thought.
Fortunately when you have corporate IT by the shorthairs, you can run your business on cruise control. A business plan so foolproof, even Steve Ballmer can manager it!
You're right, of course. No Mac user "really works" with their computers. Only Windows is capable of "real work."
Enjoy your delusion. Nice to see the Redmond propaganda ray is still working to perfection.
Ugh! Why does Microsoft let him touch a mic? Microsoft could come out with a total game changer, like a computer than can read thoughts and do things before you ask it to, but Ballmer could make it seem so droll and unexciting not even the biggest MS fanboy could muster more than a meh.
He's just not a good presenter, granted comparing him to Jobs who could get on stage, sell you a plate of poop and have you asking for seconds, expensive poop at that, probably isn't fair. But even as a CEO it seems Microsoft could be in much better hands than this guy.
10 inch "tablet"
"Hybrid" OSX
3g/4G(LTE) compatible
Geared towards Web-based apps and storage
Built-in full components of iLife and possibly MobileMe
GPS
Video iChat
Mutilple ways to intereact:
Can "write" on it with finger, stylus, pen
Can speak with it
Can type on it
$899
See you in March
SJ surprise addition to keynote
You still have problems understanding the different markets of Microsoft and Apple. Microsoft set up is more for business and everything is geared more to that end.
Apple is gear to the consumer and its products are geared that way. Apple set up for central IT is crap compared to Microsoft. Nothing is wrong with that. It is just the way the companies are focused.
... im planning on buying a mbp later this month to use only with windows 7.
First of all, am a macbook pro unibody 17 user and i love my macbook pro!
But sincerly speaking about the iSlate, i just promisse, i will never buy it if:
1.Its not an FULL OSX SYSTEM, not an iPhone OS only, if is Hybride or not i don't care.
2.Its not possible to write on open office, on that device!
3.And of course, if its not possible to design lets say like on a wacom tablet!
So in this case am sure as i readed here, its only about browseing web and book reading, that i will not buy that device.
Instead i will buy more ram and an ssd disk for my macbook pro, would make more senseGreetz
Then maybe MS should just gtfo from the consumer market. Apple knows it doesn't have a big presence in the enterprise, and is very careful and measured in what it tries to do in that area. Apple knows that "failures" in any sector would mean damage to its reputation. Apple is heavy in the consumer end and very light in the enterprise. It'll push its enterprise products now and then but the bulk of its efforts goes into the consumer sector.
MS has no focus. Like a fat old cat its ass spills into both the enterprise and the consumer sector, thinking ideas from one end just carry over the same way into the other end. It's sloppy and an insult to the Average User. The problem is (and always was), that Microsoft is just a corporate/enterprise software vendor masquerading as a home/consumer vendor. And it really shows. They don't get the consumer. They don't put any taste, imagination or originality into their products. They assume everyone is an IT manager or hardcore gamer, and speaks to them that way.
They react to eveything and react too late. The slow and predictable works quite well in the enterprise, but is a recipe for (depending on how much money you have to throw at problems) a slow and steady decline in the consumer sector. It's no accident that Apple has been the darling of the tech industry for years now, and MS hasn't. Apple gets the attention, the praise, the monopoly on compliments . . . because they've actually made an effort to earn it.
Doubt it. Even their new All in one PC looks like an iMac...
![]()
They choose that image because it is the cover of Twilight, which is probably the most popular book out there right now and they are trying to show that it can be used as an e-reader. It has nothing to do with Apple.