Well, that's a change from your usual mantra.Except neither OS is better than the other.
even better you proved my point for me thanks.Except neither OS is better than the other.
Not any more than smartphones are.
My point was more that sales don't make it better, nor do profits. A better product is a better product, regardless.
Apple stated numerous times that it has no problem cannibalizing it's own products.When the iPad was first released I was certain Apple would be the first to do this. Make the mac book air (just the air not the pro) into a tablet laptop hybrid. I guess that would cut into their iPad sales though.
Well, that's a change from your usual mantra.
Still wrong. But allow me to have my opinion based on years of using both and you can think whatever you want, too.
Then why are they still creating the same crap they did 15 years ago!?!
http://www.extremetech.com/computin...ressing-mediocre-picture-for-intels-broadwell
Repeating a lie with an article that has no bearing on it won't make it true.
And then they realize there's nothing inherently better about either OS...
Then why are they still creating the same crap they did 15 years ago!?!
http://www.extremetech.com/computin...ressing-mediocre-picture-for-intels-broadwell
Nah, more like a quarter. Another quarter will be attacking the ad itself. The third quarter will be people explaining about how it is irrelevant.
And in those posts, a huge portion will be attacking Windows for some reason (usually without reason)
Well, that's a change from your usual mantra.
Still wrong. But allow me to have my opinion based on years of using both and you can think whatever you want, too.
Says the person who's not running the Mac OS or an Apple computer, but rather a Windows OS and Surface Pro 3.![]()
It seems your annoyed by people on an Apple Enthusiasts board attacking Windows? Looking at your signarue makes me wonder why.....
Apple stated numerous times that it has no problem cannibalizing it's own products.
All these people are quoting this article, but it seems more like they're griping about Intel possibly dropping the ball on Broadwell M processors (which could effect MBAs) than they are about the quality of the machine itself.
Im not saying Core M/Broadwell doesnt have a problem. Its possible that these weak performance figures and throttling issues are either caused by Intel drivers or by overly aggressive chip positioning. More laptop launches and reviews will establish which of these is actually the problem, but if I had to bet, Id bet that the issues are mostly on Lenovos side. The CPU/SoC, for all its complexity, is still just one component in a complex system and too many of the laptops issues may have little to do with the CPU core. Wall socket power consumption suggests, for example, that the chip does draw 3-4W in light workloads well in line with Intels estimates.
Apple too has done it in the past.
Besides, even if Intel is the problem, why would they release a machine that isn't better than the previous generation's version under many circumstances? Why give an grossly inflated battery life figure that nobody can even hope to achieve under normal usage? It's Lenovo's product, so they are ultimately responsible for its performance.
You could replace this with an equivalent analysis of the 'new' Mac Mini.
More like: Says the person who was running OS X (Yosemite, even) until the Surface Pro 3 came in. But let's not let facts get in the way.
Sometimes it helps to read to the end of the article for the conclusions. They recognize that it might be Intel's fault, but that's hardly the way the article leans.
Besides, even if Intel is the problem, why would they release a machine that isn't better than the previous generation's version under many circumstances? Why give an grossly inflated battery life figure that nobody can even hope to achieve under normal usage? It's Lenovo's product, so they are ultimately responsible for its performance.
Facts? Oh by all means please show us your FACTS. And please don't bother pointing me to previous posts of yours talking about the Macs you've "owned". That proves nada. I could tell you I'm the president of the United States over the internet.![]()
It currently beats the Air in the resolution department. Touch on a laptop can be handy when on a couch or some such thing, otherwise it is awkward.
When is Microsoft going to realise it's not just about the specs... it's about certain details; details like not-crap software on beautifully crafted machines. Giving you the impression someone actually cared about your happiness.
(edit, added "just" for clarification)
So, basically, nothing I can say or do will prove anything to you. I could show you pictures of my Mac, now being used by my sister sitting beside me. I could show you the email that I had of it shipping to me. But none of that is relevant if you don't want to see it.
I don't think MS get the 'user experience' bit. I recently bought a Dell M4800, long story but I need 32GB in a laptop as a mobile VM lab. Reinstalling Windows on a laptop that is supposed to be ISV certified (i.e. best in class hardware apparently with driver support to match), proved to be a right pain in the ass. I eventually got Windows 8 working but had to guess which drivers I needed from the Dell website. I know this isn't entirely MS's fault, Dell are partly to blame too but between the two of them they failed - there is no recovery option to download the OS and all the relevant drivers from the internet. It too a full day to install the OS, drivers, a ton of updates and all my apps.
Just out of curiosity, I put another SSD in there and tested an Ubuntu 14.10 installation. It installed in under an hour and EVERYTHING just worked out of the box. The only additional app I needed to install was VMware Workstation and then copy over some data.
Microsoft, that's pretty sad when free software has overtaken you in your core market. The only reason I can think to run Windows on the desktop is Visio.
I find it so amuzing that many people on MR constantly say Apple is far behind it's competition, yet Apple's competition feels otherwise with these constant ads against the MBA. I mean, Windows already has a dominance (but mostly because people are forced to use it or it's the only thing that's installed on cheap junk laptops) so if Apple's competitors have such a better product that is so far ahead of Apple then they wouldn't need to consistently compare it to the MBA.
----------
Correct, every single bit of it is irrelevant when you decided to use the term "FACTS".