Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
YES!!!!!


i am a undergraduate at uc irvine and my e-mail works!!!!!!!!

i think every UC student should get the discount. including ucla, cal, ucsd, ucd, ucsc, ucr, ucm, ucsf, :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
Honestly, if you find this confusing, then God help us all...
Perhaps the official W7 Upgrade Chart has been the cause of some confusion:

windows-upgrade-chart.png
 
YES!!!!!


i am a undergraduate at uc irvine and my e-mail works!!!!!!!!

i think every UC student should get the discount. including ucla, cal, ucsd, ucd, ucsc, ucr, ucm, ucsf, :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

It also works for CSU students also (undergraduate at CSU Fullerton) so it should work for the entire CSU system.

GO TITANS!! :p
 
come on guys, this is only $29! for the price of a shareware app you get an operating system! i'll place this order just in case i need to bootcamp into windows someday.

Um, you're forgetting that this is an upgrade, not a full version. For people that don't have a copy of Windows, the $29 version does nothing.
 
W7's price scheme is typical of MS. If they don't mind, I'll stick with Apple OSX professional edition, which is the same as the home edition and the student edition and the upgrade edition.

When is this released? Kind of early for an announcement isn't it. Oh yeah, they want to draw off the attention to the much superior Snow Leopard.

Let em have it, anyone who wants to jump into the MS snake-pit deserves everything they get--viruses and all.

Please enlighten me on how OS X is superior to Windows 7. Also what is so bad about different versions of the OS? Consumers are going to use Home Premium, if they need features of Pro or Ultimate then they know they need those features and they will not be confused 1 bit. Also i'm sure MS does not mind if you stick to OS X at all. Not early for an announcement, it's coming out in a month. Someone with a different opinion/needs of your deserves viruses? :rolleyes:
 
I like this move, and it is a great start. This is why I like competition. If Apple would never have blown up the way they did, microsoft would not have moved an inch on their ridiculous prices.

Is XP still supported? Yes. Is Vista still supported? Yes. Do people need to upgrade their OS? No. When eventually you want a faster computer can you buy one much cheaper than Apple? Yes, which includes the OS.

Apple- profit on hardware
MS- profit on software

Cannot be compared. Compare Apple to HP/Dell/etc.
 
I bet that 64-bit PowerPoint presentation is going to be twice as awesome as any mere 32-bit presentation I've seen! :D
Especially after realizing you've blown $600 for both 32-bit and 64-bit versions to accommodate your application sets.

What's confusing :confused: You look at what version of Windows you have, look at what version you want and it tells you if you can do an install on top of it or if you need to do a reinstall of everything. Pretty simple. Vista Home Prem 64 bit to 7 Home Prem 64 bit= upgrade. Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
Confusing to consumers? nah - clear as crystal :p
 
The article is wrong, the $29 W7 price is for Home Premium. Check it out for yourself dude. Why would anyone choose the Home Premium when the Professional version offers the same plus more?http://windows7.digitalriver.com/store/mswpus/en_US/DisplayHomePage

wrongO.... When you do the order, it first gives you Home Premium, then there is an option to order Professional instead for the same cost. Here is my line items from my order this morning.


Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Upgrade
* Electronic Download

1 Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Upgrade 32 Bit Disk Kit
* Microsoft® Windows 7 Back-up DVD
 
Micro$oft is being misleading. The Microsoft equivalent to an Apple OS is Microsoft's Windows "Ultimate" edition, as it is all-inclusive in terms of features.

Apple doesn't offer a stripped-down (crippled) version of their OS. The only non-crippled version of Windows 7 is the "Ultimate" edition, and that still costs $219.99.
 
Micro$oft is being misleading. The Microsoft equivalent to an Apple OS is Microsoft's Windows "Ultimate" edition, as it is all-inclusive in terms of features.

Apple doesn't offer a stripped-down (crippled) version of their OS. The only non-crippled version of Windows 7 is the "Ultimate" edition, and that still costs $219.99.

What is offered in Ultimate that you need that Home Premium or Pro do not offer? How are they crippled to someone who will never touch those features?
 
Which applications require 32 bit Windows to run and which require 64 bit?
It all depends - If your hardware architecture is based on x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64 or Intel P4 6xx and newer), and runs Windows XP x64, 2003 x64, or 2008 x64 then yes, it will be backwards compatible with 32-bit applications. Both 32-bit and 64-bit registers exist within todays x86 processors. If your architecture is based on Itanium (IA64), then it will not run 32-bit applications or Operating Systems. The problem I am having, is finding device drivers, and their apps, to be compatible with x64. If I want to run my 64-bit apps, I'll need W7 64-bit. If I want to run my devices, I'll need W7 32-bit.

What is offered in Ultimate that you need that Home Premium or Pro do not offer? How are they crippled to someone who will never touch those features?
Valid point, unless you find yourself needing those features down the road. OS X gives you everything up-front, without the redundant upgrade charges.
 
Sorry - what does this have to do with Mac?

This place is more obsessed with Zune and Win7 than anywhere else on the web.

It has everything to do with Macs. Macs can run Windows and this news is going to vastly level the playing field.

Damn I love competition. :D You guys all realize the only one's winning here are us, the end user, right? This is awesome news even if you didn't have any interest in purchasing Windows 7.
 
Sorry, you'll have to spew your misinformation somewhere else. I have an MSDN membership through work and I've been using windows 7 for a while now (Ultimate since I get it for free).

Here are my download choices right now on MSDN.

Windows 7 Enterprise (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Enterprise (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Home Basic (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Home Premium (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Professional (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Professional (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Starter (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Ultimate (x86) - DVD (English)

That is messed up.

The x86 and x64 notations are all but gibbersish to the average user.
 
It all depends - If your hardware architecture is based on x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64 or Intel P4 6xx and newer), and runs Windows XP x64, 2003 x64, or 2008 x64 then yes, it will be backwards compatible with 32-bit applications. Both 32-bit and 64-bit registers exist within todays x86 processors. If your architecture is based on Itanium (IA64), then it will not run 32-bit applications or Operating Systems. The problem I am having, is finding device drivers, and their apps, to be compatible with x64. If I want to run my 64-bit apps, I'll need W7 64-bit. If I want to run my devices, I'll need W7 32-bit.

Valid point, unless you find yourself needing those features down the road. OS X gives you everything up-front, without the redundant upgrade charges.

What devices are you trying to run that don't have 64 bit drivers? Old hardware? Like how SL does not support PPC?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.