What a bunch of losers. They finally realised about the price but too bad they still have all those confusing editions.
Must protect the $$$ somehow.
Honestly, if you find this confusing, then God help us all...
What a bunch of losers. They finally realised about the price but too bad they still have all those confusing editions.
Must protect the $$$ somehow.
Uh...
No.
Not for $29 anyway. You could, of course, pay a lot more...
Will this version work with bootcamp on a Mac? Don't currently have a Windows system running on my Mac, but I think it would definitely be worth $30 for the few things that OS X can't do.
Perhaps the official W7 Upgrade Chart has been the cause of some confusion:Honestly, if you find this confusing, then God help us all...
Perhaps the official W7 Upgrade Chart has been the cause of some confusion:
YES!!!!!
i am a undergraduate at uc irvine and my e-mail works!!!!!!!!
i think every UC student should get the discount. including ucla, cal, ucsd, ucd, ucsc, ucr, ucm, ucsf,![]()
come on guys, this is only $29! for the price of a shareware app you get an operating system! i'll place this order just in case i need to bootcamp into windows someday.
It also works for CSU students also (undergraduate at CSU Fullerton) so it should work for the entire CSU system.
GO TITANS!!![]()
64-bit top to bottom.LOL! Can we please get that in a PowerPoint presentation?![]()
W7's price scheme is typical of MS. If they don't mind, I'll stick with Apple OSX professional edition, which is the same as the home edition and the student edition and the upgrade edition.
When is this released? Kind of early for an announcement isn't it. Oh yeah, they want to draw off the attention to the much superior Snow Leopard.
Let em have it, anyone who wants to jump into the MS snake-pit deserves everything they get--viruses and all.
64-bit top to bottom.
Perhaps the official W7 Upgrade Chart has been the cause of some confusion:
http://mossblog.allthingsd.com/files/2009/08/windows-upgrade-chart.png
I like this move, and it is a great start. This is why I like competition. If Apple would never have blown up the way they did, microsoft would not have moved an inch on their ridiculous prices.
Especially after realizing you've blown $600 for both 32-bit and 64-bit versions to accommodate your application sets.I bet that 64-bit PowerPoint presentation is going to be twice as awesome as any mere 32-bit presentation I've seen!![]()
Confusing to consumers? nah - clear as crystalWhat's confusingYou look at what version of Windows you have, look at what version you want and it tells you if you can do an install on top of it or if you need to do a reinstall of everything. Pretty simple. Vista Home Prem 64 bit to 7 Home Prem 64 bit= upgrade. Doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
Especially after realizing you've blown $600 for both 32-bit and 64-bit versions to accommodate your application sets.
The article is wrong, the $29 W7 price is for Home Premium. Check it out for yourself dude. Why would anyone choose the Home Premium when the Professional version offers the same plus more?http://windows7.digitalriver.com/store/mswpus/en_US/DisplayHomePage
wrongO.... When you do the order, it first gives you Home Premium, then there is an option to order Professional instead for the same cost. Here is my line items from my order this morning.
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Upgrade
* Electronic Download
1 Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Upgrade 32 Bit Disk Kit
* Microsoft® Windows 7 Back-up DVD
Micro$oft is being misleading. The Microsoft equivalent to an Apple OS is Microsoft's Windows "Ultimate" edition, as it is all-inclusive in terms of features.
Apple doesn't offer a stripped-down (crippled) version of their OS. The only non-crippled version of Windows 7 is the "Ultimate" edition, and that still costs $219.99.
It all depends - If your hardware architecture is based on x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64 or Intel P4 6xx and newer), and runs Windows XP x64, 2003 x64, or 2008 x64 then yes, it will be backwards compatible with 32-bit applications. Both 32-bit and 64-bit registers exist within todays x86 processors. If your architecture is based on Itanium (IA64), then it will not run 32-bit applications or Operating Systems. The problem I am having, is finding device drivers, and their apps, to be compatible with x64. If I want to run my 64-bit apps, I'll need W7 64-bit. If I want to run my devices, I'll need W7 32-bit.Which applications require 32 bit Windows to run and which require 64 bit?
Valid point, unless you find yourself needing those features down the road. OS X gives you everything up-front, without the redundant upgrade charges.What is offered in Ultimate that you need that Home Premium or Pro do not offer? How are they crippled to someone who will never touch those features?
Sorry - what does this have to do with Mac?
This place is more obsessed with Zune and Win7 than anywhere else on the web.
Sorry, you'll have to spew your misinformation somewhere else. I have an MSDN membership through work and I've been using windows 7 for a while now (Ultimate since I get it for free).
Here are my download choices right now on MSDN.
Windows 7 Enterprise (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Enterprise (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Home Basic (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Home Premium (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Professional (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Professional (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Starter (x86) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) - DVD (English)
Windows 7 Ultimate (x86) - DVD (English)
It all depends - If your hardware architecture is based on x86-64 (AMD Athlon 64 or Intel P4 6xx and newer), and runs Windows XP x64, 2003 x64, or 2008 x64 then yes, it will be backwards compatible with 32-bit applications. Both 32-bit and 64-bit registers exist within todays x86 processors. If your architecture is based on Itanium (IA64), then it will not run 32-bit applications or Operating Systems. The problem I am having, is finding device drivers, and their apps, to be compatible with x64. If I want to run my 64-bit apps, I'll need W7 64-bit. If I want to run my devices, I'll need W7 32-bit.
Valid point, unless you find yourself needing those features down the road. OS X gives you everything up-front, without the redundant upgrade charges.