Yep. First thing I'd do as CEO of Microsoft is eliminate all but two versions of Windows.
We agree on something. The seas have parted. Let's see if we can make pigs fly, too. It's possible.
Yep. First thing I'd do as CEO of Microsoft is eliminate all but two versions of Windows.
Only for people not smart enough to read a simple table....
Yeah, that's not correct. OS X is comparable to Ultimate. OS X has full networking tools and file encryption, same as ultimate.
Please don't use the excuse that most home users won't need the Ultimate features, there are a lot of people that take their notebooks right to work with them and use them as their full time work computer. A "home user" is no longer really a home user unless they have a desktop computer. Most people use notebooks for work, school, personal use or all of the above and your OS should be able to accommodate all usage without paying extra for it.
And where, on this atrocity of a chart, is this clearly stated? It isn't, and it would behoove them to list x64 with optional x32 in one package, to perhaps reduce and clarify some of the chaotic clutter, but that would be too simple and clear for smart people, now wouldn't it?Only for people not smart enough to read asimpleconvoluted table....
Microsoft either ships both x86 and x64 in the same kit, or offers a free (or handling cost) option to get the x64 disc if you have an x86 only kit.
This is complete nonsense about $600, and I'm sure that you know that.
You are calling someone else a troll, YOU??! The POT has never been BLACKER than it is now!This is the guy under the bridge calling someone else a troll...
In other words, by the venerable hypocrite himself:Only the fanboys believe the "Windows 7" is "Vista SP3" tripe. It's far more than a service pack, and a far larger jump than 10.6.
(Note that when Microsoft (Ballmer, et al) are talking to developers - the story line is that "it's a minor change from Vista, no need to rewrite your stuff". When Microsoft talks to end users, they talk about the new UI changes and other huge improvements in the user experience. Don't take the former out of context and imply that it applies to the latter....)
Yes, the reason is that Windows has modern opaque kernel APIs, and huge changes under the hood can be compatible with older kernel extensions. Because Windows 7 did not make major changes to kernel APIs, it did not warrant changing the Major ID in the version number.
Yep, like a service pack.
I like Windows 7 & Snow Leopard![]()
MS has designed a sole campaign targeted at Apple's prices, yet has no problem charging exorbitant prices themselves for multi-varietied updates. Seems to be a bit contradictory.I never understood why so many appleites beat up on Microsofts pricing but yet admittingly have no problem play in a premium for apple products?
That's anything but simple. If the average user has to ponder that for more than a second, something is wrong.
Windows Home
Windows Server
That's simple.
It shouldn't take a chart with several rows and columns and colours to explain an upgrade.
So a home/take notebook to work user needs full drive encryption? Well OS X does not offer full drive encryption.
MS has designed a sole campaign targeted at Apple's prices, yet has no problem charging exorbitant prices themselves for multi-varietied updates. Seems to be a bit contradictory.
How the average Joe is supposed to know if it is OK to install 64 bit, or whether he should install 32 bit instead, is completely beyond me. It also seems like it would be difficult to switch back and forth from 32 to 64 bit kernels if you wanted to try something out (apparently requiring a re-install of windows, unless I'm missing something).
MS has designed a sole campaign targeted at Apple's prices, yet has no problem charging exorbitant prices themselves for multi-varietied updates. Seems to be a bit contradictory.
This is highly commendable, for MS. Good to know.My son is in school and MS acedemic program has Vista Ultimate for $59 and other versions for $30.
Office had similar prices schemes.
Microsoft has an academic alliance with nearly every major higher education institution. I have yet to find one where you can't get Microsoft software and many others for dirt cheap.This is highly commendable, for MS. Good to know.
Um you do realize that your home folder is practically the whole computer for each user account? Your library, music, movies, documents, downloads, pictures and desktop are in your home folder. How much more do you need to encrypt on your Mac, the applications and Utilities?
Also my point was when you buy a new computer the OS should ready for anything you need it for. The user shouldn't have to upgrade the OS in case they want to use the computer for business needs.
The Flash plug-in sucks under OS X. It sucks even more under Snow Leopard.On a related note, why does Hulu run like ass in OS X? I'm trying to watch Warehouse 13 on a 2nd display and it's tearing pretty bad, and it's not my connection. The buffer is full.
The Flash plug-in sucks under OS X. It sucks even more under Snow Leopard.
hahah I'll pirate it anyway I'm not paying $30
That's quite correct, nothing new - right from the ***** mouth.read it, nothing new worth a response.
Next...