I think this really puts it into perspective
Wow... Just wow.
I think this really puts it into perspective
But only if your business is publicly traded.I'm glad you don't run my business!![]()
Like it or not, that's the usual lifecycle of a business. Apple have gotten around it so far because doing things 'their way' has worked well enough to satisfy investors.The most asinine comment I’ve ever read on Apple.
It’s impossible to sell Apple because right now no other company can afford to buy it.
Secondly, Apple already has a bean counter as the CEO.
Thirdly, you can’t offload the Mac division because without the Mac, there’s no more iOS, since the coding happens on the Mac.
How can so many people make so many stupid comments here?
Microsoft today surpassed Apple to become the world's most valuable publicly traded company as a result of Apple's continually declining share price, reports Business Insider.
Microsoft has reached a market capitalization of approximately $814 billion, while Apple's is now slightly less.
![]()
Apple earlier this year became the world's only trillion dollar publicly traded company, but it lost that status in November and its market cap has steadily declined since then over concerns of weak iPhone sales and its announcement that it will no longer share iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales on a unit basis.
According to Bloomberg, Microsoft's market cap has not previously matched Apple's since mid-2010, eight years ago.
Microsoft's growing cloud business and strong PC sales made Microsoft one of the few tech companies to grow in value following its September quarter earnings results. Apple's valuation, meanwhile, has fallen more than 20 percent since its own earnings results.
Microsoft shares hit a high of $105.94 in intra-day trading, while Apple's have dropped to a low of $170.27. As stock prices fluctuate, Microsoft and Apple are now competing for the most valuable company title with the lead company shifting back and forth.
Article Link: Microsoft Passes Apple to Become Most Valuable U.S. Company
Sucks you can’t afford it! Go to dollar tree, I’m sure there are plenty of off brand phones you can get for cheap.
Apple is never entry level. It’s a premium brand like Gucci, Canada Goose, or Mercedes.
If you can’t shell a measly $749 for quality, get a Honda Accord!
As someone that has followed both companies for a long time this is no surprise. Microsoft has built a product line that is little impacted by consumers. Their Azure Services are #2 behind Amazon's AWS. And for both companies these services are highly profitable. Microsoft Office 365 has been a runaway hit letting users run connected Office products everywhere, and providing 1 TB of cloud storage. Then there is Windows which is licensed on over 85% of PCs in the world.
I have been long in both companies for decades, and will probably sell APPL shares buy more MSFT, and maybe some more AMZN
The smartphone golden age is over (for now) and Apple thinks the solution is to ramp up the prices to protect their profits. Whilst there will always be the fanboys that will buy their products no matter what, people are starting to realise that spending £1500 on a phone is obscene. Apple needs to cut their margins and bring costs down. Until they do this, their stock price and sales will fall.
All of that is correct. Unfortunately, Wall Street is not looking at any of those indicators. All they are interested in is growth potential, and not at the expense of raising the ASP. The reason is that raising ASP is not sustainable; hence no long-term growth potential.Show me numbers that support AAPL is "collapsing" or "uncool."
I just showed you numbers with their best year ever at $60B in profit, over 2X that of MSFT.
Apple just posted revenue up 20% and EPS up 41% y/y.
They sold 218M "uncool" iPhones at an ASP of $761 versus 217M at only $650 the previous year. So MORE people bought iPhones and paid more for them.
Since that stellar quarter, we've gotten a bunch of speculative fake news designed to manipulate the stock and seen the overall FANG stocks go down 20% or more. MSFT was only down about 10%, so they have not been hit as much.
MSFT trades at 40 times earnings while AAPL trades at 13 times.
Apple has never had competitive prices, the tax for its great ecosystem. But they are riding a competitive advantage too hard and deserve to get rebuked for excessive greed.
Interesting. In the last few months I’ve been working exclusively on Office365 rollout at work. And ya know, with all that Ms software, I’m mostly using MacBook Pro, iPads, and iPhone to do my testing. Best of both worlds - I’m happy with the Office 365 suite of apps on great Apple hardware.
Yeah. You can see that from all the profits they used to have before...
When Steve Jobs had to justify that by saying they prefer not to decrease the prices and keep their costumer base low instead of "shipping junk" which is extremely comical and unreal.
Microsoft today surpassed Apple to become the world's most valuable publicly traded company as a result of Apple's continually declining share price, reports Business Insider.
Microsoft has reached a market capitalization of approximately $814 billion, while Apple's is now slightly less.
![]()
Apple earlier this year became the world's only trillion dollar publicly traded company, but it lost that status in November and its market cap has steadily declined since then over concerns of weak iPhone sales and its announcement that it will no longer share iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales on a unit basis.
According to Bloomberg, Microsoft's market cap has not previously matched Apple's since mid-2010, eight years ago.
Microsoft's growing cloud business and strong PC sales made Microsoft one of the few tech companies to grow in value following its September quarter earnings results. Apple's valuation, meanwhile, has fallen more than 20 percent since its own earnings results.
Microsoft shares hit a high of $105.94 in intra-day trading, while Apple's have dropped to a low of $170.27. As stock prices fluctuate, Microsoft and Apple are now competing for the most valuable company title with the lead company shifting back and forth.
Article Link: Microsoft Passes Apple to Become Most Valuable U.S. Company
All of that is correct. Unfortunately, Wall Street is not looking at any of those indicators. All they are interested in is growth potential, and not at the expense of raising the ASP. The reason is that raising ASP is not sustainable; hence no long-term growth potential.
As someone who's hated Microsoft for decades, it's well deserved.
The Microsoft of the Gates era was cutthroat. But the Microsoft of the Ballmer years was all defense and became a cancer to the tech community. Ballmer saw everything as about protecting the Windows/Office monopolies, so he'd spend tons of time trying to cripple emerging technologies through strategies like "Embrace Extend Extinguish". They'd sabotage open source projects and avoid supporting anything that helped applications work cross platform. The web was a threat. They kept developing stuff like Silverlight or wouldn't improve IE deliberately to make websites less cross-compatible.
Why? Because if things were cross-compatible, you wouldn't need Windows. This was a profitable short-term strategy. But it simply meant that Microsoft would also miss every tech boat. Web apps? Too focused on undermining it instead of becoming a leading provider of web technologies. Smartphones? Ballmer missed it completely. Etc, etc.
Microsoft under Ballmer was like if Steve Jobs was focused on saving the iPod and therefore never made a phone. And Ballmer slowly whittled away his lead.
Microsoft under Nadella is willing to experiment with new products regardless of how it might affect their other products, and it feels like a totally new company.
Apple is losing me on the desktop. Their stubbornness to exclude Nvidia drivers for eGPU usage at the very least will lock me into Windows. I still game a bit as does my son. I am not going to lock him into an OS that, right now, only excels at Final Cut Pro.
The ecosystem is still great and I still love the hardware. From a software/computing perspective Apple is really dropping the ball.
I’m sorry, but your analysis makes no sense. First, I’m a shareholder and have complained about Cook’s direction for Apple for years now. I don’t think Cook has acted in my interests, provided I’ve lost over half a million dollars on paper since early October.Like it or not, that's the usual lifecycle of a business. Apple have gotten around it so far because doing things 'their way' has worked well enough to satisfy investors.
Cook is doing what needs to be done to satisfy shareholders. I think it's clear to see he is still someone who believes in making exceptional products and being environmentally responsible etc - the issue is that he is under this pressure from wall street to also satisfy ever growing profits. Believe you me, if you got a real investor-facing CEO in there you'd soon see the difference and long for Cook back.
And that perfectly illustrates my point - a bean counter CEO literally would not care a cent if Apple owned the Mac for iOS coding or otherwise. They'd look only at what would drive the share price higher. Having everything in house and locked down is a very Apple mindset, not a general business one. It generates huge expense, and from a business PoV it's not really worth it. It's more a company pride mindset, and having the control to make everything just so. Again, this is clearly something Cook believes in, a generic CEO would not, and again, you'd soon see the difference.
I'm as frustrated as anyone else that Apple has taken the path it has with ever escalating prices, and even a whiff of nickel and diming, but let's be serious, for all the 'oust Cook' comments, I seriously don't think people realise how much worse it could be.
I visited a mall yesterday which has both Apple store and Microsoft store on it. Apple store is as always crowded while hardly any people on Microsoft store.
I know Microsoft enterprise products have a lot of customers but their consumer products sucks.
I would wonder what Steve Jobs would do to make you guys happy? Apple products has always been a premium products not for most of consumers. I still remember Apple’s commercial late 90s, compared ther products market share with BMW and the rest as Toyota’s.
The problem for Apple is not the high price. It is what people want to to get for paying such a high price.
Currently I am on Apple eco system and I can not switch to other platform. So I just get older models such as iPhone 7,8 or even refurbished ones from Apple. That works for me well so far.
Apple does need to work harder to give us a better product we want to pay for it.
Exactly. Although. With the amount of cash that Apple has, they could absolutely invest in a next best thing. Unfortunately, the only thing that Cook knows to do with it is to buy back Apple’s shares.And you know what else isn't sustainable? Growth.
Exactly. Although. With the amount of cash that Apple has, they could absolutely invest in a next best thing. Unfortunately, the only thing that Cook knows to do with it is to buy back Apple’s shares.
I think this really puts it into perspective