$800 for a MSDN subscription. or ask your employer to buy it.
You can get a TechNet subscription for $199 that includes access to all but a few Enterprise apps. Windows 8 will be available on TechNet tonight.
$800 for a MSDN subscription. or ask your employer to buy it.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/Windows-7-Sales-Licences-300-Million-Quarterly-Revenue,12096.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2011/apr/25/windows-7-licences-sold-350m-context
http://news.softpedia.com/news/500-...hipped-after-Windows-7-s-Release-203335.shtml
There's loads more sources. The general consensus is around 400,000,000 or so.
My only question is this? What is Windows 7 adoption rate? Small
I don't know anyone that uses it. Hard-core windows people went back to XP or swtiched to a MAC. Windows 8 will be great, so we can up the mac adoption rate even more.
Betime it's released, well be on OSX 11.
And Linux is like 28mb, with like 30 processes (but its modular)
Instead of wondering, do a bit of reasearch![]()
Dude really... step away from the pipe. You're hitting it way to hard.IOS DEVICES & MACS outnumber the whole Windows market. That's a fact!
"By the end of 2011, nearly 635 million PCs worldwide are expected to be shipped with Windows 7," said Annette Jump, research director at Gartner, in a statement Tuesday.
will this run in parallels / vmware?
I refuse to do any research on a tablet needing a FAN. The fan is probably there to resuscitate the user, fainting from myriad technical errors bunging up the experience and flushing files unexpectedly.
Windows 7 Adoption Rate small? Considering Microsoft has now sold 450 million copies of Windows 7, Windows 7 consumer usage is now above Windows XP.
Windows 7 Overtakes XP
If 450,000,000 copies of Windows 7 is a small adoption rate? What does that say about Lion? Or even Snow Leopard?
There's been a lot of critisism of the apparent "inconsistency" of having a desktop and a touch UI in the same OS.
I always assumed this was mostly there for backwards comparability and comparability with cheap apps that don't have a UI designed for each style but which you might occasionally want to run on both kinds of system.
I imagine that it's assumed that apps will be given an interface that adapts to either system, so most tablet users will never have to use the desktop app, although forcing desktop users to use the home screen instead of a start menu seems a pain - a lot of mouse movement there.
I fancy the look of this for the HTPC, if Steam runs in the Metro style and I can navigate with the 360 controller that would be perfect!
Lastly, I've read speculation that Apple will avoid doing this because they want to prolong separate hardware sales and this is a step towards having a phone/tablet that plugs into a dock to become your PC. While I can see the logic, I think this is clearly the future and I'm sure Apple have been working on this since Lion was conceived, if not before.
"Metro" is also a term used to refer to someone that is "gay" and does not know it. ha ha ha
So you're convinced that the same tablet using OS X Lion instead of Windows 8 would not need a fan? Really?
I think the difference is Apple was prepared to make the tough decision to have zero backward compatibility. ie create a new device category.
Trying to please everyone in the space only leads to compromise and tears.
That's the reason why smart companies leave desktop OSes on the desktop and develop thin, efficient OSes for tablets and smartphones.
I watched the hands-on video.
It looks like the UI learning curve might deter nontechnical users, especially if they're already comfortable with iOS. I just can't see any real advantage in it.
I watched the hands-on video.
It looks like the UI learning curve might deter nontechnical users, especially if they're already comfortable with iOS. I just can't see any real advantage in it.
Yeap. Windows is a complete failure. I just do not understand why World prefers it to awesome OS/X (by a huge margin)
I love how everyone knocks the tablet for having fans. Do you know why it has fans? Cause Microsoft wants devs to use the tablet to code and debug for Windows 8. You can't do that effectively with a measly ARM processor.
WHY is there this sudden obsession to combine tablet computing paradigms and desktop computing paradigms into one?
They are fundamentally different.