You all realise that Apple has their own version of one of these gathering dust because Johnny Ive and co have come to the conclusion that it's crap to use?
everytime they say "we tested it, and we didn't like it!" as an excuse makes me scratch my head.
so, the testing of a dozen designers is supposed to over-rule potential millions in sales?
And the thing that bothers me most about a lot of the fanboyism about touchscreens in OSx is this mindset that it's a zero sum game. All or nothing. The arguments always end up like this
iFanBoy: BUT TOUCH SCREENS ARE STUPID, APPLE TOLD ME SO
MSFanBoy: But I have a touch screen and I love it.
iFanBoy: BUT why would I want a touch screen when I have a trackpad which is better!
Here's a hint:
you can have BOTH! a trackpad AND a touchscreen. and develope your own workflows that can use both, either, or neither! But thats the point of the whole coversation. Option. user choice.
I have started using touchscreens in laptops, and let me tell you, the amount of times I've reached up to tap something on the screen quickly, is far easier than using the trackpad for many things. Not all mind you, but many.
the very point is, by not even offering a touch screen in an Apple computer, There is zero choice to use one should you so please. By offering a touchscreen in an Apple computer, Even as a BTO add on, You offer the user choice in their use.
I for one, when using my laptop, find it much faster to reach up from the keyboard, and directly touch the application on the launcher I want to use. Much faster than using the trackpad, finding my cursor, moving my cursor, and clicking. But as I said,
But at the end of the day, I do take resentment that if I want a new Apple computer with a touchscreen, I have Apple's Cabal of leadership telling me that since they don't like touchscreens, i'm not allowed to have one.