This feature will be about the only thing dragging me up to a 4.7inch phablet... rather than getting my 32GB TouchID upgrade from a discounted 5S.
The difference between 4" and 4.7" is minimal if Apple would reduce all their ugly bezels.
This feature will be about the only thing dragging me up to a 4.7inch phablet... rather than getting my 32GB TouchID upgrade from a discounted 5S.
Apple is profoundly good at giving things like this traction.
I said this many times and didn't get much response. I think Apple is going to introduce some kind of eWallet system that uses fingerprint for security and NFC for communication.
I'm skeptical since Apple is pushing the iBeacon technology.
I find iBeacon better than NFC on everyday usage, but of course having both wouldn't be bad![]()
Does anyone really care about NFC?
Like they did with thunderbolt and fire wire?
Like they did with thunderbolt and fire wire?
I'm skeptical since Apple is pushing the iBeacon technology.
I find iBeacon better than NFC on everyday usage, but of course having both wouldn't be bad![]()
I said this many times and didn't get much response. I think Apple is going to introduce some kind of eWallet system that uses fingerprint for security and NFC for communication.
Yet iBeacon isn't anywhere yet. Except for an Apple store I have yet to see it. Although I see NFC all over and starting next year it's mandatory for all POS
...Or if you look at this from a different perspective, it's Apple perfecting what others have failed to do right the first time. snip.
Those technologies were always meant for professionals. With the higher price point for peripherals didn't make sense for occasional use by average consumers.
Like they did with thunderbolt and fire wire?
...Or if you look at this from a different perspective, it's Apple perfecting what others have failed to do right the first time.
In 2007, there were already smartphones (Motorola Q, Samsung BlackJack, Palm, etc...) but it wasn't until Apple came to the market and perfected it. A large, bright screen that was fully touch enabled, played music and so forth.
Were there tablets? Sure, but the iPad once again, perfected the daily use of the failing device category and shortly afterwards others jumped on board and copied their formula, not to mention the iPad's design and product philosophy.
Sure other companies had larger screens and NFC first, but the device's battery life sucked. Apple has spent more time honing in on iOS and its close relationship with the iPhone's hardware to give customers better battery life, while still offering thinner, lighter devices. The same thing applies to multi-tasking functionality.
Apple isn't copying ideas, they are perfecting functions by taking their time and getting it right. Samsung, HTC, Motorola and Sony are copying Apple's DESIGNS, their PRODUCTS and even their marketing. You need to understand the difference, when you say one company is copying another. Before the iPhone, customers weren't barking for a 3.5-inch touch screen phone or a flat, touchscreen tablet, yet Apple gave it to them. That's innovation. When customers asks for multi-tasking, better batteries or larger screens, that's Apple (and any other company) fulfilling a customer's needs and desires, despite other companies having done it first.
Do you think Ford copied Toyota by offering a Hybrid? No, they listened to the market demand, because people have been asking for it.
Also, don't sit there and say that Samsung is the only one "innovating."
Name a popular smartphone that featured a front-facing camera, before the iPhone 4. Name a popular smartphone that had a truly innovative Touch ID fingerprint scanner before the 5S? Name a popular smartphone that featured an accelerometer before the iPhone. Name a smartphone that featured a universal charging port (right side up or upside down)? I can keep going. Apple perfects or implements features that are typically well received and then duplicated, unlike Samsung's blood pressure monitor, or S Health. Just wait till Health Kit hits the market, once again, Apple will push forward with better software.
This confuses me. A company like Apple doesn't need to wait for technologies to gain traction to adopt it if it itself sees use cases that don't rely on others.
As for "why now", NFC isn't just a chip, but also needs pretty big (but flat) antenna as well. Since it wasn't in the iPhone 5, it was unlikely to ever be in the iPhone 5s since it most definitely would have required a case redesign.
While I do agree that Passbook has generally been a waste of time and effort, I do see NFC potentially picking up steam and riding Apple's coattails for greater exposure.
Also, I wouldn't necessarily say that Apple copied other smartphone manufactuer's by (potentially) enlarging the screen size of the iPhone 6. Rather, they are simply listening to market research and user demand for larger-screened devices. (By your analogy, you'd be similarly accusing Chevy of copying Ford every time a new pickup truck gets manufactured.)
Wait a minute. I thought Apple abandoned the pro market? I've heard that over and over and over on here. So, which is it?
I just noticed yesterday that Apple Retail employees are using new EasyPays for for checkout/scheduling (I worked there for 4 years, so I'm a nerd and notice these things.). The new models have NFC on them. I doubt Apple would go to the trouble of updating/replacing their fleet of checkout devices just to accept payment from competitors' devices. The new iPhone will have NFC. I bet an appendage on it. Anyone up for the challenge? Whoever loses the bet loses an arm. Pics get posted to Macrumors.![]()
:YAWNS:
welcome to 2012 again? I don't think I've ever seen this in action.