slackpacker
macrumors 6502a
Anyone see a way to dim the screen after x minutes?
I assume you want this for a Clock function - For$2.99 you can get Nightstand HD .... this has a screen dimming feature.
Anyone see a way to dim the screen after x minutes?
I think of a Netbook as a little brother to a desktop or laptop. I consider the iPad a cousin to the desktop/laptop. I've used netbooks before, but for what they do, and what I do, I just simply took my MacBook with me.
Also, the iPad will offer a new way of doing old things, which is what I think people are excited for. And I think the iPad has 512MB of RAM, but don't quote me on that.
How can I win your "Apple Fan of The Day" award when you clearly point out that I'm miffed there are no Calculator or Alarm apps? If I'm telling the truth, these omissions would make me not as happy as you would seem to think I am. Also, the lack of camera/USB would further strain my patience with this company.
I'm either "Fan of The Day" or not enamored with the device. I can't be both!
Please don't confuse me with a fan boy however. It is true, on this day I love Apple and my iPad, but I've been in these forums many a time when I didn't love Apple or something they created, or some policy of theirs.
I only call them like I see them.
Yeah, I fast touch type. It's a little hard in portrait mode, the keys are closer than I'm used to. (auto correct pops up a lot, and when it's wrong, I need to spam the delete key and retype.) I might be able to adapt, but I haven't had my iPad long enough to find out.
Landscape mode has just the right spacing for me. The iPad keyboard seems much more responsive than my G1 iPhone, and I can touch type at basically full speed. I put the iPad flat on the table in front of me, and just type like normal.
I assume you want this for a Clock function - For$2.99 you can get Nightstand HD .... this has a screen dimming feature.
One question, where the h*ll is the DVD slot? Anyone who found it please PM me asap!
The problem I see with the iPad is that you must have a computer to link it to. If they want to have broad acceptance, then it must be computer independent. This device is a perfect 1st computer for many people who don't need all the bells and whistles of a full fledged computer, but in order to use it, you have to have a computer. Doesn't make sense that way. Apple should set up a "cloud" computer for the user so that he/she can access and update all info online.
That's fair enough. I was actually quite excited to hear about the rumoured tablet before it was announced, as I wished to buy one for my dad. I had seen the HP Slate which appears to run a full, native version of Windows 7 - thus, too much, too fiddly for a touchscreen interface. But the iPad just seems to be on the other end of the spectrum, too simple.
Plus I just can't see the point in an iPad - I just simply regard it as a computer aide as you said. I personally place both netbooks and the iPad into that same category and to me the iPad has very little to boast about. I was reading another thread in this forum where iFixit was quoted as saying it actually has 256 mb ram rather than the 512 previously stated.
I don't hate the iPad, I just think Apple screwed up with the product placement here. They'll reel in the consumers for sure, but I'm also sure alot of techies won't be buying this which is a shame as Apple seems like the company that would have got the balance right.
I don't hate the iPad, I just think Apple screwed up with the product placement here. They'll reel in the consumers for sure, but I'm also sure alot of techies won't be buying this which is a shame as Apple seems like the company that would have got the balance right.
Now we're completely reliant on the app store and thus on what apps apple allow us to have. If this really is the future of computing, as some on this thread have put it, then it's a bleak one.
I couldn't have put this any better. The use of the iPhone OS just feels like a cop-out. I honestly believe that the success of the app store took them by surprise, and in their excitement they just decided to crowbar the iPhone OS into a tablet rather than custom-designing an OS that would've given techies a bit more freedom whilst still keeping things relatively simple. Now we're completely reliant on the app store and thus on what apps apple allow us to have. If this really is the future of computing, as some on this thread have put it, then it's a bleak one.
Its so bleak that when I enter my password in the appstore to download and app and it actually works. Again someone who has not even touched the iPad spouting off. Dude the OS is different. Yes its based off of iPhone code. But the apps are more like the full OS X versions rather than iPhone like. Computer companies and mp3 player makers have been cramming in real OS'es into devices for years....each and everyone has been a failure and has not had anything but minimal support.
So I went to my local Best Buy last night and purchased one, 16gb model, I am very impressed on the looks, feel and clarity of the screen. The touch is very accurate and it is pretty fun to use...
The problem I see with the iPad is that you must have a computer to link it to. If they want to have broad acceptance, then it must be computer independent. This device is a perfect 1st computer for many people who don't need all the bells and whistles of a full fledged computer, but in order to use it, you have to have a computer. Doesn't make sense that way. Apple should set up a "cloud" computer for the user so that he/she can access and update all info online.
What is wrong with people????
All pictures are of the iPad alone. No perspective of it in relation to a human. For sizing, perspective. It could be any size when shown alone! OK Steve Jobs held it. How about some attractive women holding it?
The problem I see with the iPad is that you must have a computer to link it to.
I couldn't have put this any better. The use of the iPhone OS just feels like a cop-out. I honestly believe that the success of the app store took them by surprise, and in their excitement they just decided to crowbar the iPhone OS into a tablet rather than custom-designing an OS that would've given techies a bit more freedom whilst still keeping things relatively simple. Now we're completely reliant on the app store and thus on what apps apple allow us to have. If this really is the future of computing, as some on this thread have put it, then it's a bleak one.
With so many people fixated on hardware, software and network, features and benefits, I would like to see posts and threads about LIFESTYLE CHANGES and things that heretofor were impractical or inconvenient without an iPad.
This will tell real people in real terms, "What's this thing good for?"
Just Rocketman
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1417374&postcount=342Just did some basic GLES fillrate tests and holy crap ..... the iPad is damn slow.
My custom fillrate demo can display about 400 sprites at 30 fps on the older iPhones and it goes up to 1750 on the 3gs (both of them obviously running at 320x480).
On the iPad , running at 1024x768 with sprites scaled up , it cannot pull more than 400 while maintaining 30 fps, which essentially means at that resolution it performs at about the same level as the original iPhone.
Given that , you just won't be able to port graphically intensive 3gs apps to 1024x768 and expect them to run at the same framerate.
http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPad-Teardown/2183/2Decoding the part number shows there is 2Gb of memory inside. This translates into ~128MB of memory per die, for 256 MB total. (NOT 512MB, as we previously reported.)