Hmmm.......to me, "HD" is not 1024x768 on a 9" screen. When I think HD, I think 1080p, on a screen 50" (or bigger), with at least 5.1 surround. But, whatever floats your boat.
lol, screen size is definitely not part of the HD definition.
Hmmm.......to me, "HD" is not 1024x768 on a 9" screen. When I think HD, I think 1080p, on a screen 50" (or bigger), with at least 5.1 surround. But, whatever floats your boat.
Took a quick skim through the last page or so, not sure if someone had mentioned it earlier, but...
http://www.droid-life.com/2010/06/17/verizon-already-fixes-droid-x-error/
Droid makers are such tryhards LOL. When people say droids are better than iPhone i just say well they come out with a droid every 6 seconds so ur already outdated. Also the droids are always ugly and what will I do with that gigantic screen plus u will use up all of the usually limited memory and have to buy a sd card. So good luck with droid
At the rate that Android phones are being released, I think the days of Apple just being able to do a yearly update are over. While Android is still behind IMO, the gap has narrowed.
As opposed to just buying whatever Apple poops out, despite specs, features, whatever - because it has an Apple logo on it.
The iPhone was the best phone until this year, absolutely.
But the reign is over. The Android phones coming out before the end of this year just blow the iPhone out of the water.
The Android 2.2 UI is basically as good as iOS4, with the advantage of being open and it runs full Flash. Android OS 2.3, which will focus on UI, will be even better.
So, finally, we have a choice.
Once you've used a 4"+ screen, the 3.5" iPhone screen looks bleh. Seriously, I was actually enjoying browsing the web on the EVO, while I never do on my 3Gs.
Useless resolution bragging rights notwithstanding.
The Android phones coming out before the end of this year just blow the iPhone out of the water.
In the past Apple have had there own space, no PC manufacturer in recent years has been able to compete on similar terms,. Same with the ipod although arguably for different reasons (ipod is the only music player in the shop these days)
The smartphone market looks like its not going to lie down and have its tummy tickled. I think the Google phones are an excellent competitor where as wild horses wouldn't drag me from my Macbook to a PC, I will pay the premium. With iphone and Android, not so much, mild donkey's may be all thats required.
Smart stuff from google,
Macrumors said:Update 2: Verizon has modified its Droid X teaser page, replacing the "720P Screen" text with "Captures 720p", indicating that the earlier "error" in it's teaser page had sufficiently done it's job of attracting attention to the forthcoming device by drawing momentum off the iPhone 4 craze.
Flash sucks (especially on a phone), so I'd put that as a negative, not a positive.
iOS is superior to Android OS. Faster, more intuitive, more consistent across different SKUs.
I would rather have a 3.5" screen if it allows the device itself to be much smaller.
Can anybody tell me what's the advantage of HD or any HiRes on a 5" display?
You want to enjoy HD get a bigger screen at least 30", that's where you going to enjoy your photos and videos with this size of screen.
Yeah SJ says nice fonts on a HiRes iPhone 4 display. Are you going to read more now because the font is much better? Not! Wake-up people! The reality is everything looks good on a 5" display unless the video or photo is a crap! Ohhh high density!?!?!
The Android 2.2 UI is basically as good as iOS4, with the advantage of being open and it runs full Flash. Android OS 2.3, which will focus on UI, will be even better.
Don't worry, the tech industry is constantly moving forward, so competition will come.I was hoping for some competion for the iPhone too. Between page 1 and 6 of this thread. But reality kicked in. Did you notice?![]()
You mean like how Apple put up images of the iPad showing what appeared to be Flash-based websites loading properly, when Steve Jobs' own attempts at loading the same site when unveiling the iPad showed the infamous blue box?This wasn't a "typo".
You really think Motorola/Verizon put up a website without checking it 10+ times for mistakes?
They tried to get attention by lying.
The iPhone was the best phone until this year, absolutely.
But the reign is over. The Android phones coming out before the end of this year just blow the iPhone out of the water.
The Android 2.2 UI is basically as good as iOS4, with the advantage of being open and it runs full Flash. Android OS 2.3, which will focus on UI, will be even better.
So, finally, we have a choice.
Once you've used a 4"+ screen, the 3.5" iPhone screen looks bleh. Seriously, I was actually enjoying browsing the web on the EVO, while I never do on my 3Gs.
Useless resolution bragging rights notwithstanding.
This wasn't a "typo".
You really think Motorola/Verizon put up a website without checking it 10+ times for mistakes?
They tried to get attention by lying.
High dpi displays aren't some magical technology. I still remember 1920 x 1200 on a 15.4" Latitude. Next up, Sony.
Your statement almost seems to justify Apple doing it because "it's Flash".Yeah there's no way that they didn't know what they were writing. Not saying Apple didn't do this with Flash on the iPad at that one point, but pretty ridiculous to lie about something like that because it's hardware, not just something like Flash, which I hardly miss other than Hulu.