Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The problem with having to charge your watch every night is that you can't use it at all for sleep monitoring or (subtle) wake up alarms. It'll be interesting to see how Apple's device handles battery/charging since there has been a lot rumored about sleep monitoring.
 
Of course they are. They're for those that want to track their vitals. I'll finally be able to ditch my ugly FitBit and uninstall my battery sucking RunKeeper. It will likely have features that will let you keep your iPhone in your pocket or purse. It's a pain to constantly be pulling my iPhone out of my pocket during meetings to see who's 'vibrating' me. Now, I'll be able to simply look at my wrist. Yes, it's for a specific niche market... the most everyone niche market.

It's funny because every time they mention heart rate monitors and step trackers I groan.

I don't want that ****. I just want notifications, basic commands (play, pause, nest thermostat, reply to message) and a simple search for things like "how many kilograms is 5 pounds".

I just hope I can turn the superfluous stuff off to increase my battery life.
 
15 years ago, when you might of had a Nokia phone, which lasted a week to 10 days on a charge and someone told you there was a new phone coming out which was new but needed to be charged every single day, and may not even last a day if you use it a bit.

I wonder what you would of said?

You can't compare. I agree with the concept to a point. But ultimately, these devices would be displacing a watch, not a phone. And since right now, we already have powerful computers that can fit in our pocket, the need for another similar device is less "warranted" than replacing a dumb phone with a portable computer.

If that makes sense. I haven't had my first cup of coffee yet ;)
 
What's this?!

It even predicts when you are going to die of heart failure. Pretty amazing. The future is now. :p
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-09-05 at 8.37.29 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-09-05 at 8.37.29 AM.png
    236 KB · Views: 72
It's funny because every time they mention heart rate monitors and step trackers I groan.

I don't want that ****. I just want notifications, basic commands (play, pause, nest thermostat, reply to message) and a simple search for things like "how many kilograms is 5 pounds".

I just hope I can turn the superfluous stuff off to increase my battery life.



I agree with you 100%!! I also think people want unrealistic battery life. These aren't conventional watches,so you won't get conventional battery life. I'd be surprised if I could get 24 hours out of a smart watch. Considering all the things that this iWatch may do. I'd be very very surprised to see 24 hours. Let's hope they have some very innovative way to recharge the watch while wearing it.
 
I suppose that people want lots of different stuff really. Some people want a cheap durable smart watch for logging vitals and changing music while running.

I want a smart watch to wear at work, so I can check my e-mails and messages when walking around the site and see who is calling me in meetings and the like. Those are very different devices.

I think that Android is better poised for this to be honest. I can buy a nice metal watch from a watch maker, and someone who runs a lot can buy a light plastic sweat proof thing from an accessory maker.

I just don't see Apple having that much flexibility.
 
I quit wearing a watch years ago. My car has clock, my computer has a clock, my phone has a clock, my stove has a clock, my TV has a clock, and every work environment has a big clock on the wall. I am never without my phone and it has notifications, so why wear a watch?

I just don't see the need until the watch can replace my phone and I don't see that happening with the current state of technology. Plus if the current phone innovations are the indication of a trend, then the watch that replaces my iPhone will only be available in 6 or 7 inch screen. :rolleyes:
 
I agree with you 100%!! I also think people want unrealistic battery life. These aren't conventional watches,so you won't get conventional battery life. I'd be surprised if I could get 24 hours out of a smart watch. Considering all the things that this iWatch may do. I'd be very very surprised to see 24 hours. Let's hope they have some very innovative way to recharge the watch while wearing it.

I think you're confusing what people want for battery life vs what's unrealistic.

The question is - does having all of these functions/features warrant sacrificing battery life and whether or not the cost/battery makes it a wanted purchase.

I don't think anyone expects a dick tracy type of watch having battery life (for now) that lasts too long. Perhaps a less functional watch that doesn't try to do "everything" but has much better battery life is more attractive.
 
Each to their own, personally I think this is really bad for a smart watch. I can go with charging my phone everyday but definitely not the watch. Just hopping this won't be the case with whatever wearable Apple is bringing.

Hence why I bought the Pebble, which lasts me 5 or 6 days without having to recharge. I love this thing. I can't imagine not having it with me all the time. And when you consider it's waterproof, i.e. in the shower, rain etc... it's even better.

I'll wait to see what Apple comes up with, but so far, my Pebble, which I got near Christmas for only $129, makes me happy right now.
 
I think you're confusing what people want for battery life vs what's unrealistic.



The question is - does having all of these functions/features warrant sacrificing battery life and whether or not the cost/battery makes it a wanted purchase.



I don't think anyone expects a dick tracy type of watch having battery life (for now) that lasts too long. Perhaps a less functional watch that doesn't try to do "everything" but has much better battery life is more attractive.

----------

[/COLOR]
I think you're confusing what people want for battery life vs what's unrealistic.



The question is - does having all of these functions/features warrant sacrificing battery life and whether or not the cost/battery makes it a wanted purchase.



I don't think anyone expects a dick tracy type of watch having battery life (for now) that lasts too long. Perhaps a less functional watch that doesn't try to do "everything" but has much better battery life is more attractive.


Two things.... People are going to buy this no matter what and people will complain about the battery life no matter what. Lol.

I think for you and I we'll make a logical decision based on what we see and functionality. Others will not and then complain. I have set my expectations of battery life very low.

A lot of people find more functions attractive and care less about battery life. However,I am not one of them. :)
 
Last edited:
I quit wearing a watch years ago. My car has clock, my computer has a clock, my phone has a clock, my stove has a clock, my TV has a clock, and every work environment has a big clock on the wall. I am never without my phone and it has notifications, so why wear a watch?

I just don't see the need until the watch can replace my phone and I don't see that happening with the current state of technology. Plus if the current phone innovations are the indication of a trend, then the watch that replaces my iPhone will only be available in 6 or 7 inch screen. :rolleyes:

I thought the same thing. And then I got a great deal on a Pebble and I'll tell you why I like wearing it (even though for several years I had stopped wearing a watch for the same reasons you listed).

I have a daughter now. When she's napping or down for the night, I have my phone ringer off. If I'm not near my phone or it's face down, I can still get alerts on my wrist as to whether or not an email came in, or if someone is calling me. Not only a visual alert - but it will vibrate on my wrist.

Same thing at work. I often have my ringer off. And I do step away from my desk. Since my daughter is in daycare, it's great to have caller ID and my wrist vibrate if they call with an issue.

In the cold weather (and NYC was bitter last winter) I had my phone in my pocket - but I could still quickly check what an email or WhatsApp message said (or look at the time) while walking about.

Not a MUST have device. But definitely nice. And honestly - not sure I need/want more in such a device. I like its simplicity. It's a black and white display. Battery lasts a good stretch. It's not heavy on the wrist. Etc.

None of higher tech smart watches appeal to me. But then again - for now - I'm not really into the whole body/health sensor craze. To me - these watches are "too" much.
 
I saw android wear in action. I think they missed the point of smart watch and google now doesn't work as it should.

basically you just get a notifications all day on your hand and thats it. i hope apple will give more than that and expect the 8GB of flash drive to give us also music on the run or smth
 
I like the way they've used a overlay for the screen on the video, trying to make the screen look sharper and faster than it probably is. :rolleyes:

I have the LG G watch - industrial design and not a fashion accessory. Android Wear is extremely nice to use. Absolutely zero lag, so no worries there. The battery lasts one day (and that's 24 hours) - should be more.

I doubt Apple will be offering anything better, to be honest.
 
For what it does, at the size it is, it is pretty incredible!

Reviewers state that the battery life is not "all day" in practice.

Here's one example (http://online.wsj.com/articles/moto-360-review-one-size-doesnt-fit-all-1409896802): "Most days, after charging it overnight, I had to put it back on its wireless charging cradle by 4 p.m. If only the large black circle could also work as a sundial so I could still tell the time when the battery dies."

I think it's very nice looking and if I had $250 to spare, I'd consider it, but there's still a lot of room to grow. Now the 2nd or 3rd version of the watch might just be one to get (especially since it will improve as competition to Apple's watch).
 
I saw android wear in action. I think they missed the point of smart watch and google now doesn't work as it should.

care to elaborate? It works exactly as it should (e.g. it shows you the cards you need - reminder for your next appointment etc.) and has full voice support. If you need to do a more extensive search, just hit a button and it'll continue on your phone.

----------

Hence why I bought the Pebble, which lasts me 5 or 6 days without having to recharge. I love this thing. I can't imagine not having it with me all the time. And when you consider it's waterproof, i.e. in the shower, rain etc... it's even better.

I'll wait to see what Apple comes up with, but so far, my Pebble, which I got near Christmas for only $129, makes me happy right now.

I first had the Pebble - and yes, its battery life is pretty awesome. However, it's just too basic. I don't need notifications for every single SMS I get. What I do need is that it shows me the reminders I've set for a certain location or those I need in the next 15 minutes - Android Wear delivers that, the Pebble doesn't. Plus having to navigate it via buttons just plain sucks.
 
It looks pretty nice.

Voice search and commands will be huge. It's illegal to use my phone in my car, but not to use my watch!!

$400 will not allow me to get the watch though.
 
The watch looks fine until the guy wears it on his wrist at the end. That thing is huge and cartoon looking. I'm talking Flavor Flav.

It's obvious to me now that Apple will not do a round wearable. Just look at their screen choices for the iPhone and iPad. They completely buck the industry trend and it payed off for them in a big way. Not only is a round watch difficult because of the bezel issues, it's stupid for any app involving text.
 
It's the first smart watch that looks really good in my opinion. Sharp design as well, but problem is its still a smart watch. I am not sure I need or want one.

If the iPhone 6 disappoints I may try the new Moto X and give this watch a 30 day trial since it really needs to be paired with an Android phone. I am actually more interested to hear about the new Moto X than this watch.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.