Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Motorola Unveils 4.7-Inch Moto X Smartphone with 24-Hour Battery and Touchless Controls
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Have you bothered to look it up? How do you claim it to be 'fail' ?
The first time you setup moto X it records the " OK, Google Now" in your own voice to train. It only trigger on your voice and if someone else says that phrase, it doesn't respond.
Provided it can handle the advertised + usual workload and still maintain battery life: Cellular on, always listening plus voice commands, bright screen, Maps and games.
Advertising a false 24 hour battery life is just going to backfire. Unless google prefer to lie again, then they just don't care and continue to treat people like idiots with this so-called tactic.
If so, it looks like Google is the old Microsoft. Evil.
Last edited:
I agree. Siri is near useless in its current form. I do have to say, though, it does have its moments. I just told her "you can go away now" and she responded "did I do something wrong?" But, this is just a cute party trick rather than anything of substance.
I use Siri almost daily for driving routes, and Reminder creation. Just like that google ads. "Remind me to see my dentist 6 months from now". It would get the date right and propose to create the reminder with the description filled out.
I use it for voice call too. "Call so-and-so". In iOS6 it would get some names wrong consistently. In ios7 beta, it gets all of them right.
I use it for voice call too. "Call so-and-so". In iOS6 it would get some names wrong consistently. In ios7 beta, it gets all of them right.
You're looking for Slashdot (now renamed Appledot). MacRumours is a website which discusses Apple competitors.
MacRumors has become an extension of Google's PR department. What does another mid-range Android phone with a generic design have to do with Apple related rumors?
This just shows the competition are striking earlier than expected before the launch of the 5S and if all that model turns out to be is a 'faster, sharper' model of the 5 - but with fingerprint recognition - then Apple cant expect to continue as it has done unchallenged to date ...
Cant Imitate My Ass!
Cant Imitate My Ass!
Uhm, it might be because it's positioned as Google's own iPhone competitor.... But I am sure you have your eyes shut an fingers in your ears, going "la la la."
And really, "an extension of Google's PR department?" Note to self: buy more tinfoil.
Apple is very slow. After a year they are going to add an s to iPhone5. Nowadays my grandmother also releasing a smart phone every month. What's wrong with you apple???
At least for the new phone do something about the battery life and the screen size. That's all we want.
At least for the new phone do something about the battery life and the screen size. That's all we want.
Another example of Android fragmentation within Google
This is the flagship product that Motorola/Google is releasing and it runs (X-1) version from last year and NOT the version X released a month or so back.
Doesn't this show that the platform is severely fragmented? Am not discounting the phone or its features. But what does this release show to the user - Google's own Motorola cannot come up with a phone running latest greatest, how can this task be expected from other OEMs.
There are a lot of cool features that many may like... only the lack of latest greatest is a weakness that even Google cannot handle. Why? Is the platform and extend of customization so complex that OEMs take months if not year to provide updates? May be the knowledgeable experts can share their thoughts.
This is the flagship product that Motorola/Google is releasing and it runs (X-1) version from last year and NOT the version X released a month or so back.
Doesn't this show that the platform is severely fragmented? Am not discounting the phone or its features. But what does this release show to the user - Google's own Motorola cannot come up with a phone running latest greatest, how can this task be expected from other OEMs.
There are a lot of cool features that many may like... only the lack of latest greatest is a weakness that even Google cannot handle. Why? Is the platform and extend of customization so complex that OEMs take months if not year to provide updates? May be the knowledgeable experts can share their thoughts.
Enough with the Jailbreaking Already!
That always seems to be the case. Always have to jailbreak everything.
That always seems to be the case. Always have to jailbreak everything.
The phone is trained to your voice. You're going to have to follow some initial setup so that the phone knows it you talking.
Android fans aren't angry because of the specs; all of those had already been leaked long beforehand. They were hoping for a killer off-contract, unlocked price, like that of the Galaxy Nexus or Nexus 4. Unfortunately it's priced more like the iPhone (hint, the target that Motorola has its crosshairs set on). Luckily, the sequel to the Nexus 4 is coming soon. Motorola won't be making the hardware of course, but neither Samsung nor LG are slouches at making good hardware (LG in particular; Samsung plastic can go away for all I care).
But Motorola isn't trying to appease the swathes of hardcore Android users; they're trying to build and sell the Android-equivalent of an iPhone "experience"--something that seems smooth, easy-to-use, and is visually appealing.
That said, I think Android phones are already there in terms of smoothness, ease-of-use, etc. (as long as you haven't been made too stubborn by iOS already). It's more Motorola's marketing and how they're targeting the phone toward the more regular consumer with intuitive, innovative features like the always-on selective info screen (this is big, to me), the unique camera controls and the active voice commands.
I know that with the Moto X, Motorola focused heavily on optimisation rather than specs that would drag the battery life down. This is why it's dual-core, not quad-core, and 720p, not 1080p (which would look no different on a screen of this size anyways). The average consumer is far more concerned with the phrase "lasts a full 24 hours of use" than the term "quad-core CPU". Look at the iPhone 4/4S and 5--they were decidedly all under-specced when released if you consider the CPUs, GPUs and amount of RAM that they COULD have stuffed in there, but they didn't, because they didn't need to. It's an exercise in strategic restraint. When you watch the preview videos of the Moto X at work, it's just as smooth, if not smoother than, the Nexus 4 and the Google Play editions of the HTC One and Galaxy S4. They abandoned the specs war because they know people are going to come into the store, fiddle with it, and realise it's fast and smooth rather than simply believe and expect it based on something they read.
I do hope the Moto X succeeds--it's not meant to satisfy the throngs of already die-hard Android users. It's meant to sell to the average consumer who's looking for a new smartphone, who more than likely has an iPhone.
But Motorola isn't trying to appease the swathes of hardcore Android users; they're trying to build and sell the Android-equivalent of an iPhone "experience"--something that seems smooth, easy-to-use, and is visually appealing.
That said, I think Android phones are already there in terms of smoothness, ease-of-use, etc. (as long as you haven't been made too stubborn by iOS already). It's more Motorola's marketing and how they're targeting the phone toward the more regular consumer with intuitive, innovative features like the always-on selective info screen (this is big, to me), the unique camera controls and the active voice commands.
I know that with the Moto X, Motorola focused heavily on optimisation rather than specs that would drag the battery life down. This is why it's dual-core, not quad-core, and 720p, not 1080p (which would look no different on a screen of this size anyways). The average consumer is far more concerned with the phrase "lasts a full 24 hours of use" than the term "quad-core CPU". Look at the iPhone 4/4S and 5--they were decidedly all under-specced when released if you consider the CPUs, GPUs and amount of RAM that they COULD have stuffed in there, but they didn't, because they didn't need to. It's an exercise in strategic restraint. When you watch the preview videos of the Moto X at work, it's just as smooth, if not smoother than, the Nexus 4 and the Google Play editions of the HTC One and Galaxy S4. They abandoned the specs war because they know people are going to come into the store, fiddle with it, and realise it's fast and smooth rather than simply believe and expect it based on something they read.
I do hope the Moto X succeeds--it's not meant to satisfy the throngs of already die-hard Android users. It's meant to sell to the average consumer who's looking for a new smartphone, who more than likely has an iPhone.
Nice ad, a few comments:
* Voice activation of voice recognition has drawbacks of security and unintentional activation.
* I'd like to see the accuracy of this voice activation. Imagine taking this into a noisy environment and falsely activated. Worst, broadcast audio activating this hacking the security.
* Like the "Assembed in the USA" at the end. A good jab at Foxconn and Apple's other overseas manufacturers.
* I'd rather have a lover I'm sleeping with remind me to buy more coffee for me and wake me up 20 minutes later instead of a phone. Then again, when mobile systems voice rec has an third party API, Rule 34 will be all over this.
* Voice activation of voice recognition has drawbacks of security and unintentional activation.
* I'd like to see the accuracy of this voice activation. Imagine taking this into a noisy environment and falsely activated. Worst, broadcast audio activating this hacking the security.
* Like the "Assembed in the USA" at the end. A good jab at Foxconn and Apple's other overseas manufacturers.
* I'd rather have a lover I'm sleeping with remind me to buy more coffee for me and wake me up 20 minutes later instead of a phone. Then again, when mobile systems voice rec has an third party API, Rule 34 will be all over this.
we will have to wait a year for 4.7"
This sucks. The only thing I envy of the samsungs and motorolas is the screen size.
How in the world Apple is not seeing the light?
Size Matters. iPhone users want bigger phones.
Stupid Tim Cook doesn't realize the "experience" can be better with more space...
This pisses me off a lot!
This sucks. The only thing I envy of the samsungs and motorolas is the screen size.
How in the world Apple is not seeing the light?
Size Matters. iPhone users want bigger phones.
Stupid Tim Cook doesn't realize the "experience" can be better with more space...
This pisses me off a lot!
Are you?
In order to use the active voice commands at all the phone forces you to say "OK Google Now" at least 3 times so it can learn your voice. Then whatever you say will be processed by Google's servers to be translated into a command or search function.
Do you think Siri works any differently? Both Google and Apple have throngs of voice-processing and data mining servers at work.
Have you heard? There is a new moto x always listening for your commands. No need for silly Siri.
i'll wait to see the battery life, i dont think it'll easily pass 24 hours with an always on microphone.
Same thing with my co-worker. In her case, she not only found Android to be confusing and frustrating to use, but her Galaxy S3 is now refusing to charge properly / hold a charge. She's limping along until iPhone 5S comes out.
Look at the post count on this thread versus all other news. Seems Moto did something right!
----------
It's not worth it, man. There will be people who always think Apple is the magical wonderful moral company and everyone else is the devil and out to spy on you. Don't give those people the light of day...
----------
It's not worth it, man. There will be people who always think Apple is the magical wonderful moral company and everyone else is the devil and out to spy on you. Don't give those people the light of day...
I like that too. I've seen manufacturing crumble in this country over the past few decades and its good to see some of that coming back now.
My one concern is serviceability. I like that my iPhone 5 can be easily repaired, based on what I've seen from the iFixit teardown. I read Anandtech's article on the Moto X and it looks pretty sealed up. Guess there's no way to know for sure until someone takes it apart, but I favor devices where I can do the repairs myself if necessary.