It shows the casing is higher, not thicker. The inside is not a solid block of plastic or aluminum, it's hollow so that the internals can fit.
Seriously, you have a problem with your logic...
The insider parts are the same. Same inside volume, thicker outside volume. Definitely thicker casing.
Apple is soon to release a new version of their Macbook notebook computer. Much of the recent press about the new Macbook has centred on the 'revolutionary' manufacturing processes it will engage to manufacture the enclosure referred to as 'the brick'. The articles published tended to focus on the latest in laser machining and waterjet cutting technology being used to produce the enclosures which had many readers envisioning laser beams and jets of water turning a raw slab of aluminium into the final product in a matter of seconds with no other processing required.
Having read about this futuristic laser machining process being used to produce the Macbooks, thousands of people searched the internet to find out more about laser machining and most found their way to ManufactureLink's directory of manufacturing processes where laser machining, and waterjet cutting process are discussed in detail.
But in reality the laser machining and waterjet cutting processes being publicised were just media hype and the real manufacturing processes being used, while still state-of-the-art, are somewhat less like something out of Startrek and more like something found in any modern machine shop.
Can you quote on a specification page where the internal volume of the case is defined so that you can back up your statement here ?
Until there, it's not "definitely thicker", it's "you assume it's thicker".
The video is evidence the process is different, not more expensive.
Melting and molding plastic requires machinery also, maintenance for said machinery and plenty of power to keep those high temps.
Once again, you are just guessing and providing no factual evidence that in the end the manufacturing process of the polycarbonite MacBook costs less to make than the 13" aluminum MacBook Pro.
room237 said:They couldn't stop the damn hammering for 5 min while they filmed this video?
well you know apple like to bust down doors so they have to reinforce em
You guys arguing for the sake of arguing?
Do you really not believe that CNC milling a unibody from a solid block of aluminum is not more expensive than molding a piece out of plastic? Material costs aside, the process is much more time consuming as it requires many more steps than the injection mold process. Time equals money, but sorry I do not have any proof for that statement.![]()
isn't the difference between 5400rpm and 7200rpm like $10 ?
From the clock on the side of the MacBook box above it appears the white MacBook will still have a 7-hour battery. The difference in $200 comes from the battery, RAM, Firewire 800 port and SD Card slot.
I'm not a material sciences guy, but I ran a quick search:Macbook is 1.08 inches thick. 13" Macbook Pro is 0.95 inches. It shows that the casing is thicker with the plastic Macbook.
Someone with material engineering background can probably dig out more info on the weight/volume.
X how many tens/hundreds of thousands of MB sales, and yes $10 becomes very relevant.
Nobody who would buy a MB gives two hoots about how fast the thingy spins, if they even know that it does; geeks and specwhores buy MBPs!![]()
How did this Vietnamese web site get an actual production unit?
They must have a good inside source to get this, and also get the iPhone 4G prototype.
I'm not a material sciences guy, but I ran a quick search:
aluminum 2700g/m^3
polycarbonate 1300g/m^3
Source: http://edboyden.org/constants.html
So are you telling me Apple invented the machine to stamp or cut the unibody cases? The Waterjet was invented in the 50-60's. I don't believe Mr. Jobs had even smoked his first joint by that time.
No I am not, you having reading comprehension issues? I asked for your proof that they did not have to develop any machinery.
And you also have no clue what you are talking about, the unibody is mostly milled using CNC machinery, not waterjets. Watch the video, pay attention.
I'm sure Seagate or whoever provides the drives to Apple could work out a deal.
I love the 13" Macbook Pro. I wish Apple would just do away with the polycarb units.
Apple got details about a stolen iPhone 4G prototype... and this is their way of paying backHow did this Vietnamese web site get an actual production unit?
They must have a good inside source to get this, and also get the iPhone 4G prototype.
I think it's safe to assume Apple, a consumer electronics company, did not have to invent any heavy machinery and used some of the already available units on the market in the factories spread out over Asia.
And of course you can't claim facts without proof. They're not facts if they're not backed up by evidence.