I've always been bothered with the idea that people thought MagSafe was just better. It's not. This implementation is great because it's really a best of both worlds situation... but if I had to pick one, it was USB-C all day, every day:
- No more proprietary charger
- No more proprietary connector
- Allowed single plug for data and power
- Could use ports on either side for charging
MagSafe is nice if you're plugged in at an airport or in a conference room. I get it. If you're plugged in with kids running around, also great.
The question is, when and why are you actually plugged in for these scenarios anymore? In the age of 15+ hours of battery life, why on earth are you plugged in while not at a desk for
hours on end. I still don't get the pining for MagSafe. Am I the only one who works at a desk where my cables aren't easily tripped on? I have kids and dogs and all that. That's why, when I use my laptop in those scenarios, I don't plug it in. I can get through an entire work day on a full charge.
When battery life in the real world was more like 4 hours, this was really, really nice. But seriously, why do people think this is such a big deal at this point? What is the real world scenario where you need to be constantly plugged in somewhere that tripping is a high risk? I'm sure there are legit scenarios for this, but they're niche now.
Heck, I'm more likely to be in a situation where I forgot a charger than in a tripping zone. USB-C lets me borrow pretty much every modern charger from anyone else at this point.