Yeah, like Apple would have given a mock up of their coveted iPhone to other suppliers before it's announced. 3rd party companies put out accessories within a week of announcement so I doubt Apple would have done this.
Yeah, like Apple would have given a mock up of their coveted iPhone to other suppliers before it's announced. 3rd party companies put out accessories within a week of announcement so I doubt Apple would have done this.
looks good to me, id be happy if it was real
Have you ever wondered what that large piece of plastic slapped onto the bottom back of the iPhone is for?? If reception wasn't an issue through the metal used on the back of the phone, do you think they would have put that there??
No i never wondered, i know its to house the radio antennas and yes i know aluminum acts as a faraday cage but that didn't make Apple shy away from Aluminum now did it
iMac...Aluminum
MBA...Aluminum
MBP...Aluminum
Mac Pro...Aluminum
Mac Mini...Aluminum
iPhone 1...Aluminmum <---- With Plastic
Apple TV...Aluminum
All of which are wireless devices. In other words, signal reception is not that much of an issue
I hope the 3G iPhone uses the same materials (glass&aluminum&thinnovation)
I don't get why they had to go with plastic though what was wrong with aluminum? its malleable, green and better looking. Maybe reception issue but i doubt. I prefer the look of iPhone 1. If this is the final design then i might just go and get me a 16GB iPhone 1.
Then again iPhone had fake prototypes distributed around to throw people off. This may be the case here, i'll maintain skepticism till i see one powered on and in use
Just to put the monkey wrench in again, there is clearly a smudge (or something) on the screen of this thing that could be the front mounted camera in pretty much the exact right location.
Also, if the camera is supposed to be under the glass (and it is), and this is an iphone without any "naughty bits" (also looks to be the case), then the front mounted camera wouldn't actually be there. The glass over the top of where it is supposed to be mounted need not show anything either.
So we could still be talking about a front mounted camera anyway. *crosses fingers*
.
I think e-Mail and Safari on the iPhone are fun but not really usable because there's no spam filter, no password saver and Safari is just slow, even on WIFI.
Can we s***can this White Colorscheme fetish already? Holy crap I wanna throw up everytime a cool device has to become Pearl White.
Puke.
Is it an Evil Knievel White Helmet fetish or something?
All of those devices except the iPhone unsurprisingly don't need to get onto the GSM network, only WiFi a different kettle of fish all together. I'm not trying to be nasty about it just putting across my view on it. Thats the one thing I loath about conveying information through text, there is no emotion or feeling as to how you are saying something. Maybe 10.5.3 will provide the fix lol!!
No i never wondered, i know its to house the radio antennas and yes i know aluminum acts as a faraday cage but that didn't make Apple shy away from Aluminum now did it
iMac...Aluminum
MBA...Aluminum
MBP...Aluminum
Mac Pro...Aluminum
Mac Mini...Aluminum
iPhone 1...Aluminmum
Apple TV...Aluminum
All of which are wireless devices. In other words, signal reception is not that much of an issue