But they did sort it out. They reduced the price to add a new user to $329. That might still seem steep, but Apple's multi-user feature, unlike others', allows for fully simultaneous usage!
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New 9.7-Inch iPad Teardown Confirms It's Basically an Original iPad Air
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
They are when iPad sales are in a steady decline. Apple appears to be getting desperate to reverse the decline, hence the near abandonment of Mac and absurd push for iPads and iPad Pros.
Aside from multi-touch what major innovations came from Apple under Steve? I guess buying PA Semi but the fruits of that are only now showing under the Cook era.
[doublepost=1490888544][/doublepost]
Why are people over analyzing this product? It isn't intended to be anything more than a low cost iPad. The people buying this don't care if it has the latest and greatest display technology or the fastest Touch ID sensor. They just want a lower cost iPad. That's what this is.
iPod, iPhone, Airdrop, Airport, Time Machine, iTunes, App Store, USB-1 standard (debatable), and an OS that's easy-to-use, stable, and functional.
Jobs would never have retrograded a product line just to compete on price. That was antithetical to his entire philosophy on tech business.
Just another example of how Cook's Apple, Inc. is most certainly not Jobs' Apple Computer.
Just another example of how Cook's Apple, Inc. is most certainly not Jobs' Apple Computer.
The core iPad experience isn't going to be compromised by a slightly thicker body or a slightly less awesome display. Having an entry level iPad for those who won't take advantage of the special extras is totally reasonable. If you want an iPad as nice as the old iPad Air 2, you can pay extra for the iPad Pro 9.7.
Frankly I wish Apple would take a similar approach with Macbooks/Pros. The Macbook line is sorely missing a NEW (as in latest, or near latest specs) general purpose, entry level computer at around the $999 price point that could help attract new users to the ecosystem.
Frankly I wish Apple would take a similar approach with Macbooks/Pros. The Macbook line is sorely missing a NEW (as in latest, or near latest specs) general purpose, entry level computer at around the $999 price point that could help attract new users to the ecosystem.
It makes sense. But you know what Step One to a unified unfragmented platform would be? To include Smart Connectors and Pencil Support even in EVERY Ipad. Including the so-called $329 "affordable" model.
It's so frustrating to see bloggers excuse this new iPad by saying "It's perfect for Education" while ignoring the fact that an EDU aimed device benefits greatly from a keyboard. Apple was 90% of the way there with the Smart Connector and all they had to do next was create a blocky, durable, affordable keyboard to bundle with it. But instead they went backwards because.... profits.
Apple is to blame for creating fanapples always expecting better, thinner etc, that's what Apple always promoted.
But many buyers also complained about the Apple tax, so here is the cheapest new iPad ever, for a market with thinner demand and lower sales. It's a good business choice. Real innovations may come in the Pro line (but maybe not), we'll soon see...
But many buyers also complained about the Apple tax, so here is the cheapest new iPad ever, for a market with thinner demand and lower sales. It's a good business choice. Real innovations may come in the Pro line (but maybe not), we'll soon see...
I'm with you 1000%. Apple Pencil and keyboard should be standard bundled with at LEAST the iPad Pro, and should be compatible with the regular iPad. Who knows though, maybe they're working on this.
Apple already lost the war against Google Chromebooks in the EDU-sector, so I guess they just will stop to compete and bring something special and useful for schools.
In my personal opinion, with all this so-called "new" they losing many users especially all the pros, companies and schools. Even iPhone is losing more and more against his competitors and its just 1-2 years away to losing there as well. More Chinese companies are bringing better phones for much lower price and Apple can't compete anymore. They already "live" from the past and their service in the shops but not from new innovative products.
I'll bet the margin on this iPad is even bigger because they use an even older non laminated screen. Grab one guys before it's sold out
[doublepost=1490889791][/doublepost]
Considering it's still using old parts and priced above € 400 I'm not calling it a bargain.
[doublepost=1490889942][/doublepost]
They should have done that with all the Macs too. If there ever comes a new iMac and it's not a total redesign it's bye bye for me
So does that mean Apple's bringing back good-ol OS X Snow Leopard and rebrand it as macOS Basic Version...?
The iPad mini is getting replaced by the phablets anyway, like the iPhone 7s and 7s plus (also only a processor swap, lol). Beats me why they haven't done the same thing with Macs. Minimal effort and customers would have appreciate it. Too late for that now.
The point you're missing is that innovation is all Apple ever talks about. Reusing old iPhone and iPad chasis with minor spec bumps is hardly that.
Let's not overlook that the Apple of Steve J is different from the Apple of Tim C. Steve's Apple was trying to survive. Tim's Apple is trying to maintain a position of dominance.
The haters and whiners are out in force. I suppose each has purchased multiple iPad Pros and is sitting on piles of cash he or she just can't wait to throw at Apple, hence the disappointment.
Newest iteration looks very functional. I expect it to sell well and make a lot of folks quite happy this coming Christmas.
Newest iteration looks very functional. I expect it to sell well and make a lot of folks quite happy this coming Christmas.
I love how people see a product that doesnt meet their personal requirements and automatically jump to the conclusion that its useless. Sure it may be basically old tech, but given the small upgrade to the CPU and the much better price point, I think this particular iPad will find its niche with a particular demo of customers. Customers with even older iPads who could never justify the price of the air 2 or pros. Just because a product isnt for you doesnt mean it shouldnt have been made. You dont like it? Dont buy it. Simple.
A better name for this device would be "Phil's Ass" - as apparently it could not be innovated.
Last edited:
I like the idea of entry level systems. Like the Mac Mini for many of us that are not Pro (power) users. I purchased an iPhone SE and Apple Watch Sport. Not as powerful as the iPhone 7 and Watch, less expensive, does the job. Additionally Tech Specs are just specs, comes down too, does the product get the job done at a price point for the user.
I agree with you
But in Apples terms' they solved that dilemma: this one has had million users over the years
The older form factor is not what gets me about this, rather the lack of an anti-reflective coating. It was introduced for a reason, because without it you will have a huge amount of glare outside on a sunny day or in a brightly-lit room. The iPads with the coating are bad enough, but much better.
If Apple wants me to spend money on replacing my iPad Air 2, the replacement must be an upgrade, not a mixed upgrade/downgrade. The only way iPad Air 2 owners can get an upgrade is to buy the iPad Pro.