Holy, imagine the backlash (and all the smug “well you should have one already anyway!!1!” posts) if they pulled this with the USB-C iPhones 😬Waiting for an iPhone without cable...
Holy, imagine the backlash (and all the smug “well you should have one already anyway!!1!” posts) if they pulled this with the USB-C iPhones 😬Waiting for an iPhone without cable...
It's getting to be too much courage. They're really pushing it.I’ve seen a lot of courage today.
Exactly, you can't have it both ways. Everyone wants to bitch that apple should move everything to USB-C because everyone already has a USB-C cable. So apple doesn't include the cable that "everyone already has" and it's the end of the world?I am used for apple to being greedy, but to their credit they finally gave us an usb C port, and chances are that people already have one today anyway. I rather have a USB-C port with no charging cable (as I already have many) rather than an included lightning cable with a lightning port
Ethernet and Matter support, if you buy the more expensive version.I’m struggling to see what I’d gain by upgrading.
A lot of people are not happy with Tim Cook today 😆Tim. Thanks for the memories but it’s time to go
Such courage and innovation..
Oh yeah I know. Like why defend a trillion dollar company for freeThis is the kind of attitude I’m sick of on this site. Making stupid excuses for bad behaviour in the most thoughtless way.
The only reason I have such a cord on hand is because I already own an iPad Pro. Otherwise with every other Apple product that isn't a Macbook requiring Lightning, why would you expect others to have a USB-C cable laying around?I mean it's USB-C, if you get an Apple TV with a USB-C remote and you don't have a single USB-C cable to charge it with, there is a bigger problem...lol
they are doing it because they can and not for the environment.It should have been included. But Apple is doing it for the enviorment. Brazil or France is not going to be happy about this one.
If you're buying an Apple TV and don't have a USB C cable in your house already, you likely have no business buying an Apple TV.Since it's a rechargeable remote, buyers are going to need one.
Get over the missing cable people.
Is that all you can comment on the new Apple TV?
My thought is they should increase the price by $5 and include it.
Like many others, entirely missing the point. It’s not about, cost it’s about waste.- but yeah the cost to Apple to include a cable is negligible so I understand.
Downvote me all you want, but it makes sense. I have the old Siri Remote (thin one) and I only charge it like three times a year? The new one has a much bigger battery, so the average person would probably only have to charge it twice (or even once if they tend to use their phone as a remote often) a year. Paired with the fact that it has a common port, that most people have at least one USB-C cable in their homes at this point, and that these remotes charge to full in like 30 minutes, and it makes sense why you'd remove it. I'd even say it's a waste of a cable.
I'll be awaiting your "Apple Sheep" and adjacent replies.
That's unironically a good idea for a cheaper Apple tv.Next year they won't include a remote. Everybody has an iPhone and Apple Watch, who needs the pesky remote?