Yeah, Apple, please redesign the sleek little black box I hide inside my media console next my other little black boxes... /sRedesign please
Or did you mean the remote?
Yeah, Apple, please redesign the sleek little black box I hide inside my media console next my other little black boxes... /sRedesign please
The amazon device is superior in every way (stated as an Apple consumer) and cheaper. The only place the AppleTV is better is being a HomeKit hub. I was blown away by what the FireTV 4K stick does for the price and I can airplay to it with an add on appIt uses top quality - pro standard components. No way could it be £99. If you want cheap in every way, buy an Amazon device.
It's truly wrong to expect pro level performance for £99.
What could the "one more thing" be? [...] We'll soon find out.
The AppleTV is really a fantastic product, however, it *really* needs to be cheaper. Much *much* cheaper. The 4K AppleTV should be no more than £99.
I was playing with my friend's Note 10+ last night and I was more and more blown away with that phone!
The amazon device is superior in every way (stated as an Apple consumer) and cheaper. The only place the AppleTV is better is being a HomeKit hub. I was blown away by what the FireTV 4K stick does for the price and I can airplay to it with an add on app
A10X scores much better than A12 in Geekbench Metal, both in Geekbench 4 and Geekbench 5. However, some gaming benches are faster on A12 than A10X.If it's not the A12X I am not sure it will be significantly better for gaming.
It uses top quality - pro standard components. No way could it be £99. If you want cheap in every way, buy an Amazon device.
It's truly wrong to expect pro level performance for £99.
My wife gives me the side eye for getting the Apple TV. We previously had a Roku and a Google dongle and both worked fine. But the Apple TV is kinda buggy and we all know about the remote. Needless to say she absolutely hates the remote. I try to console her by saying she “should have seen the previous one!”
It doesn’t help. But she goes along with it, since we already have it.
Well, they went from iPad8,x to iPad11,x. Dunno why... except there are two new iPad lines coming this year... Hmmm...There are tons of AppleTV version strings in the betas and even in tvOS release... AppleTV12,1 AppleTV14,1 etc. etc.
Seeing AppleTV11,1 in a plist doesn't mean anything.
Not to mention why would they go from 1,1 -> 2,1 -> 3,1/3,2 -> 5,3 -> 6,2 to suddenly 11?
I use Apple TV to get iTunes 4K and to get Dolby Atmos from Netflix 4K.Except for what it is, it doesn't need "pro standard components". (What are "pro standard components" for a streaming media box, anyway?)
The only reason that makes any sense to have higher-cost components is gaming. And unless Apple is going to make a big serious push in to gaming, I don't see that going any better than it already has.
For media, the existing AppleTV 4K has all the components/power necessary to push the highest quality video any current TV can handle, and those components should be able to be made cheaper now. Maybe if they're going to make an 8K model... But they were late to 1080p, weren't a first-adopter of 4K, I can't see them being the first mover on 8K, either.
And with smart TVs being the standard now, they'd really need a standout feature to drive continued sales. Especially with iTunes and AirPlay integration moving directly in to TVs. I bought an AppleTV 4K before I had a 4K TV just to future-proof. But now that I have a 4K TV, I find I rarely use my AppleTV, since everything I need is built in to the TV's smart TV functionality. (Other than playing iTunes movies or AirPlay streaming, because my TV manufacturer isn't adding those to pre-2019 models.) Pretty much the only time I turn on the AppleTV any more is when I want to mirror my phone screen to the TV for some reason. Which is rarely.