aafuss1 said:I'd like to see the maximum RAM amount icreased to 1.25GB/2GB and the 9200 with 64MB of VRAM.
Dont Hurt Me said:I agree, if iam not mistaken its a tuned down 17" studio display and my now 4 year old display is doing great. Crts you dont have much to worry about and they last for years and years.......
MacPhreak said:The eMac's display is not a Studio Display. The eMac has a shadow mask display, which is why I won't buy one.
aliasfox said:You would think that the addition of a TV tuner would make the eMac into an awesome all-in-one: moderately powerful computer, moderately sized TV, DVD player/recorder, and with the addition of an iSub, a moderately decent sounding stereo. Of course, media center PCs haven't taken off, so I doubt that an eMac with TV tuner would. And yes, a combination TV/DVD/VCR/Stereo would be awesome for a dorm room or small apartment, especially if the unit *looked* like a TV, as the eMac most assuredly does.
Skiniftz said:There better £$%@£%$'ing well not be a new eMac - I just bought 42 of them of which half are delivered already.![]()
Skiniftz said:There better £$%@£%$'ing well not be a new eMac - I just bought 42 of them of which half are delivered already.![]()
Skiniftz said:There better £$%@£%$'ing well not be a new eMac - I just bought 42 of them of which half are delivered already.![]()
MacFan25863 said:I personally think they should sell the old iMac as the new eMac. Afterall, the emac adopted the old iMac design, why not do the same now?
If you are asking us to guess, I'd guess no. Apple hasn't pushed aggressively into the low-end market. I think they already consider the eMac to be their entry point, and are more likely to improve its specs than to reduce its price.ijimk said:I was thinking of buying my mom and dad one for christmas do you think this update will lower the price even more? like say below 799?
Doctor Q said:They might upgrade RAM and/or disk space down the road, but it's not a good plan in the long run to buy a slower processor or stripped down configuration if they would expect to use the system for many years.
Mr. Anderson said:Speaking of which, I'd wonder if they'd also upgrade the video card so it will handle Tiger better.....
D
0% chance. They have no reason. They may compile for different 32 and 64 bit versions, but an all 64bit line-up by the first half of 2006 is the absolute most wrong prediction ever.aswitcher said:I think by the time Tiger appears ALL the lines will have 64 or better base as standard IF Apple want to really make their machines fly...which means they probably wont...
jimsowden said:0% chance. They have no reason. They may compile for different 32 and 64 bit versions, but an all 64bit line-up by the first half of 2006 is the absolute most wrong prediction ever.
ijimk said:Why 42? What is your use for 42 emacs?
ijimk said:Why 42? What is your use for 42 emacs?
Yvan256 said:Maybe he's trying to compute the answer to life, the universe and everything.