New eMac Tomorrow?

aafuss1 said:
I'd like to see the maximum RAM amount icreased to 1.25GB/2GB and the 9200 with 64MB of VRAM.

well, you're one for two.

the current 1.25GHz eMac (released April 13, 2004) can take up to 2GB of RAM.

anyway why not set your sights higher for the video card wish? such as a Radeon 9600/9700... anyway I just wanted to clarify about the eMac's RAM ceiling.
 
Headless eMac = bad idea

In my opinion, the eMac was made really to continue the design of the original iMac. The all in one design is great for schools, and unlike the first LCD iMac, the eMac is far less fragile. The all in one design of the eMac is great for schools looking a sturdy computer that won't clutter up spaces. Unfortunately, the eMac is atrociously ugly... an updated eMac that resembled the old iMacs [but with larger flat CRTs] and came in various colors would boost eMac sales not only in schools, but for consumers looking for a simple, cheap desktop. So many people still love the design of the old iMacs, and would buy this computer simply for the look.
 
Dont Hurt Me said:
I agree, if iam not mistaken its a tuned down 17" studio display and my now 4 year old display is doing great. Crts you dont have much to worry about and they last for years and years.......

The eMac's display is not a Studio Display. The eMac has a shadow mask display, which is why I won't buy one. Colors are washed out, and the display just isn't that sharp. Sorry, but after looking at Trinitron displays all my life, the eMac's display is abysmal; it really detracts from the 'wow' factor of OS X. Shadow mask displays can also have weird ghosting issues sometimes, but I haven't seen any on the various eMac's I've played with.

The Studio Displays were Trinitron/DiamondTron-type displays (Trinitron, I'm 90% sure of it). Much much sharper, and vivid colors.
 
I think the new eMac should come with an NVidia 5200 graphics card, because it's as cheap as the ATI 9200 and supports CoreImage (and the ATI 9200 does not).
 
MacPhreak said:
The eMac's display is not a Studio Display. The eMac has a shadow mask display, which is why I won't buy one.

It's true. However, you can attach any sort of monitor you want to an eMac. I run a 19" FD Trinitron CRT as the main display (at 1344 x 1008, 100Hz) and use the built-in CRT (at 1024x768, 89 Hz) as a secondary display. Great for notes, palettes, IM/mail windows, etc.

Once you go dual-monitor, you never go back. The spanning hack rules.
:cool:

-vga4life
 
aliasfox said:
You would think that the addition of a TV tuner would make the eMac into an awesome all-in-one: moderately powerful computer, moderately sized TV, DVD player/recorder, and with the addition of an iSub, a moderately decent sounding stereo. Of course, media center PCs haven't taken off, so I doubt that an eMac with TV tuner would. And yes, a combination TV/DVD/VCR/Stereo would be awesome for a dorm room or small apartment, especially if the unit *looked* like a TV, as the eMac most assuredly does.

Internal TV tuner is the only thing keeping me from dumping my Linux desktop. I have a PowerBook with an eyeTV, but it just doesn't compare to the internal TV tuner in my PC due to the latency and the need for having another box connected.

Put a TV tuner in the iMac and I'll buy one right now. Same would probably be true for the eMac.
 
There better £$%@£%$'ing well not be a new eMac - I just bought 42 of them of which half are delivered already. :mad:
 
Skiniftz said:
There better £$%@£%$'ing well not be a new eMac - I just bought 42 of them of which half are delivered already. :mad:

I feel your pain. ;) :D
 
Skiniftz said:
There better £$%@£%$'ing well not be a new eMac - I just bought 42 of them of which half are delivered already. :mad:

Got them for some company/school? I'm pretty sure you don't use those all only yourself . :D
 
Skiniftz said:
There better £$%@£%$'ing well not be a new eMac - I just bought 42 of them of which half are delivered already. :mad:

darnit, I just bought a 2005 Lotus Elise. they BETTER NOT make a 2006 model! I'm warning them ... :)
 
MacFan25863 said:
I personally think they should sell the old iMac as the new eMac. Afterall, the emac adopted the old iMac design, why not do the same now?

The old iMac, iLamp, is a very "liked" model and they cannot take the risk to harm the iMac G5 sells..

and plus, if eMac is going to be LCD headed, then it means that the cheapest mac will be above 1000 USD in United States and 1000 euro in Europe which can never ever compete with a custom-build chaisis only PC which never cost more than 600-700 with best price/performance configuration made.

I wished Apple could release a chaisis only mac (without screen -lcd or crt-) with dualcore G4 and good configured machine and with a price of a prescott P4 PC which is 700 or at most 800..
 
I was thinking of buying my mom and dad one for christmas do you think this update will lower the price even more? like say below 799?
 
ijimk said:
I was thinking of buying my mom and dad one for christmas do you think this update will lower the price even more? like say below 799?
If you are asking us to guess, I'd guess no. Apple hasn't pushed aggressively into the low-end market. I think they already consider the eMac to be their entry point, and are more likely to improve its specs than to reduce its price.
 
Another point to keep in mind is that, if Apple offered the current eMac at a lower price and an improved eMac at the current price (just speculation, remember), you still might be better off getting the higher priced of the two. With more up-to-date specs, it'll be that much longer before it becomes obsolete for its purpose, whatever that is. Your parents probably aren't the likeliest candidates for constant upgrades to the latest and greatest state of the art computers, so you'll want this one to last them a while. They might upgrade RAM and/or disk space down the road, but it's not a good plan in the long run to buy a slower processor or stripped down configuration if they would expect to use the system for many years.
 
Doctor Q said:
They might upgrade RAM and/or disk space down the road, but it's not a good plan in the long run to buy a slower processor or stripped down configuration if they would expect to use the system for many years.

Especially with a new OS coming out around the corner that will require ever more of the computers processing power.

Speaking of which, I'd wonder if they'd also upgrade the video card so it will handle Tiger better.....

D
 
Mr. Anderson said:
Speaking of which, I'd wonder if they'd also upgrade the video card so it will handle Tiger better.....

D

I think by the time Tiger appears ALL the lines will have 64 or better base as standard IF Apple want to really make their machines fly...which means they probably wont...
 
so as of now what macs are able to run tiger? Is it G5 tower, G5 imac, G4 tower, G4 power book? any others? if not can we expect the ibooks will support tiger on an upgrade? same question applies to the emacs.
 
aswitcher said:
I think by the time Tiger appears ALL the lines will have 64 or better base as standard IF Apple want to really make their machines fly...which means they probably wont...
0% chance. They have no reason. They may compile for different 32 and 64 bit versions, but an all 64bit line-up by the first half of 2006 is the absolute most wrong prediction ever.
 
jimsowden said:
0% chance. They have no reason. They may compile for different 32 and 64 bit versions, but an all 64bit line-up by the first half of 2006 is the absolute most wrong prediction ever.

Jim!

Not 64 biut - 64 MEG graphics cards :p


So any predictions on the new emac?
 
Yvan256 said:
Maybe he's trying to compute the answer to life, the universe and everything.

maybe hes making a eMac bowling alley to show how bad these things need to be upgraded...


ohhh the pain!!!

Side note: i can already see the new slogon for the New eMac: "The only Apple desktop still using a G4"

yeah.... rigggghhhhtttt :rolleyes:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Back
Top