No, iPhone 4G is easier. What's wrong with that? Everyone knows what you're talking about, it makes sense.Yeah, just call it "fourth generation iPhone" or "next iPhone" rather than "iPhone 4G". Duh.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
New Evidence iPhone 4G Images are Authentic
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Picture shows it's fake
If you look at the one picture on engadget where it is one image with multiple smaller angle shots in it the back of the device in the one picture has something like a pokeball instead of an apple.
http://www.engadget.com/photos/iphone-4g-proof/#2904446
...bottom right to be exact
If you look at the one picture on engadget where it is one image with multiple smaller angle shots in it the back of the device in the one picture has something like a pokeball instead of an apple.
http://www.engadget.com/photos/iphone-4g-proof/#2904446
...bottom right to be exact
Personally I'd rather have a carbon fiber design over an aluminum one, why? Signals can pass through it with ease plus it looks sexii
It will be glass.
Crap. The ONE time I don't go out downtown, someone idiot engineer loses a prototype iPhone. What are the odds!
I still don't buy the story. Can't the photos be fake and real? Like, the photos on the iPad are legitimate but the photos in that guy's hands are fake?
Whatever. Stupid time better hurry up so we can all be disappointed and begin speculation on iPhone Ultra 5000 (5th generation).
I still don't buy the story. Can't the photos be fake and real? Like, the photos on the iPad are legitimate but the photos in that guy's hands are fake?
Whatever. Stupid time better hurry up so we can all be disappointed and begin speculation on iPhone Ultra 5000 (5th generation).
And as everyone knows, the dielectric constant is approximately 4. My wife knew that, so I had to marry her.
there is a light reflection .. but look at the apple logo .. or lack there of
and bottom right corner .. not top right.
Looks like those pictures that were taken and posted on aplesfera are FAKE. They person admitted to it. Read the final update!!
http://translate.googleusercontent....le.com&usg=ALkJrhiYJCToRH1yYb4Bm2NX0NoJ_72L3w
Now here is where I am confused. What about the picture from 4 months ago next to the iPad?
http://translate.googleusercontent....le.com&usg=ALkJrhiYJCToRH1yYb4Bm2NX0NoJ_72L3w
Now here is where I am confused. What about the picture from 4 months ago next to the iPad?
Because A.) it contradicts Apple's own published naming scheme and B.) it will be confusing when Apple does release a 4G-network-capable iPhone. Are you going to call that "the iPhone 6G-but-in-actuality-4G"?
The people that take these pictures need to take a lot more of them at different angles. Just taking a few in bad light and bad angles is so noobish. Oh well, its all in good fun right?
I don't believe that Apple ever called the Edge phone the '2G' phone. It was called just "the iPhone" at the time and now something like the "Original iPhone" or first-generation.
People use the 1/2/3/4G labeling as a habit from the iPods to quickly refer to different generations.
It will never be the actual retail name though, I would guess either iPhone 4 or iPhone HD.
Oh why I chose the iPhone as my material sample for my Advanced Level Physics presentation.
The constant changes for some material. If we are to talk about glass (as laminates in this case), which glass are we referring to: glass melamine, glass phenolic, epoxy etc.
old news, they were on about the ones that were clearly photoshopped. not the engadget ones.
These ones were fake:
Attachments
cmaier, why would they use glass for the back? What are the advantages? Wouldn't that just make it less durable over all?