New Evidence iPhone 4G Images are Authentic

[pcguru83]

Also in this part the apple logo is cut out... which says to me that there may be a glow on the back through the Black glass like the Macbooks. Nice.

Sim Slot on the side.
Can see the camera.
Can't see a Flash

These might be related. Perhaps the Apple logo will be the flash. That might work the more I think about it.

There's probably no room for the radios, which means they'd have to put it at the bottom and then boom, they've made the first-gen iPhone all over again.

Not going to happen.

You know, I'd be OK with that. I still believe the original iPhone design was the best (granted, we've only seen two designs, but still). I love the original iPhone design.

 

[apple nut]

I really don't think this is the new iPhone. Why would they go with something thicker and boxer than they have? They could easily have put the stickers on there to make it look like the new iPhone.

 

[walangij]

The only people who know these are fakes are the ones that know what the real thing is. We are all speculating one way or the other.

Like some have said, looks don't make a phone, the software does. That's why the iPhone has been so successful. Not because it's the prettiest phone, but because the software works so well.

Real or not, it will sell incredibly well not because of how it looks, but because of how it functions.

 

[rtabdo]

Here is another pic. Fake or real?

http://yfrog.com/78zpzj

 

[prowlmedia]

Apple take removable batteries out of laptops, don't put removable battery in the iPad and you expect on in the new iPhone.... dream on

As I said it's a Directive I read about... Not 100% Couldn't find any newer info though.

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/10/06/new_eu_directive_pushes_toward_replaceable_iphone_batteries.html

Although it would be nice - but I've never had a problem really charges in <1 hour and pretty much everywhere has some way to charge an ipod!

 

[Anthony T]

Here is another pic. Fake or real?

http://yfrog.com/78zpzj

Fake and already been posted.

 

[rotobadger]

I really don't like the design either but it did occur to me that this MIGHT be a CDMA version for Verizon. I thought I read somewhere that the hardware for CDMA is a little bulkier than GSM and the current iPhone form wouldn't be able to accommodate the components.

So...maybe a CDMA version?

Still, I agree that it looks Nokia-ish.

 

[Jelsoft]

Here is another pic. Fake or real?

http://yfrog.com/78zpzj

Fake. No flash, metal. I really can't see apple using the apple logo as the flash hole. That is so tacky.

 

[wildcardd]

Heh. I bow to the sober. Little pished on Cider...

+1. Although some fine Kentucky bourbon for me. Love my Makers Mark.

 

[Captain Planet]

Here we go again...

 

[cvaldes]

Here is another pic. Fake or real?

http://yfrog.com/78zpzj

Fake. Shadows are wrong. The text is weird looking. The overall shape is decidedly un-Apple. The speaker grilles aren't very Apple either. Laughable.

 

[prowlmedia]

These might be related. Perhaps the Apple logo will be the flash. That might work the more I think about it. .

Awesome idea!

 

[wildcardd]

Here is another pic. Fake or real?

http://yfrog.com/78zpzj

Fake and fugly.

 

[chatin]

Didn't see the point of posting in the Japaneese counterfeit thread because this is a prototype that ran iPhone OS. Don't know a fake in the world that can be blanked by Infinite Loop remotely.

 

[natvalente]

Here is another pic. Fake or real?

http://yfrog.com/78zpzj

if this was true, it would also mean, that the apple logo would likely be a glowing one like the ones on the back of the laptops, which could be a flash

 

[monsterofNone]

engadget's idea of "what can be clearly seen" and mine are two different things.

 

[Dr Kevorkian94]

i think it would be really cool for apple to use the apple logo in the back as a flash but like u said its tacky

 

[martynmc7]

You know, I'd be OK with that. I still believe the original iPhone design was the best (granted, we've only seen two designs, but still). I love the original iPhone design.

Oh, I wasn't saying the original iPhone looked bad, simply that Apple don't tend to move backwards with their designs. They either stand still or move forward.

 

[prowlmedia]

The only people who know these are fakes are the ones that know what the real thing is. We are all speculating one way or the other./QUOTE]

I refer you to the the name and therefore the point of this website.... Durrrr

 

[3583582]

All I can say for certain is that is not how the final iPhone New will look.

 

[ltldrummerboy]

This is how I like my rumors. Fast and furious.

 

[Jof]

My bet - triple bluff by Apple; neither the iPad shot nor these new ones are representative of the final design. Just like the iPad price rumor, Apple is seeding the fanatics to drive discussion in a direction that makes the real solution look even more spectacular.

Seems very unlikely they'll step away from the contoured shape. So if they stick to their recent aluminum fetish, I reckon they'll use a cold forming process combined with machining and laser cutting.

In fact, I'd bet £10 on it

 

[jaw04005]

I really don't care if they are real or not...I trust Apple to make an attractive iPhone.

I dunno they do make the rare mistake. For example, the squat-looking iPod nano was pretty bad in both design and the colors offered. The eMac was pretty ugly too.

 

[rotobadger]

Again...

Thick and boxy = CDMA (Verizon?)

Hmmm...

 

[Scottsdale]

It's a watermark, not an actual hole.

LOL... I noticed that too. Not a lot of proof when someone has to makeup comparisons based on a photo identification watermark and not the real product itself. Still LMAO!