Not to mention: Who is clamoring for this BS anyway? I've never felt deprived by not having bunch of windows on my phone or even tablet.
The number of windows is irrelevant, it's the apps those windows run. Right now a single Lightroom window uses 3.5 GB of RAM alone whereas I have six Word documents open and it uses 600 MB. Even the four windows that Stage Manager on an A12X/Z system is limited to would be challenged by having Lightroom, Photoshop, ProCreate, and Safari with multiple tabs open at once. When iPadOS runs out of RAM it suspends apps and forces them to reload. On my old iPad with 3GB of RAM if I had a large image project open in Affinity Photo and went into Safari to grab a stock image there was a good chance by the time I came back to Affinity the app would reload because the system ran out RAM between just those two apps. Try opening those 72 Safari tabs you mentioned on an iPad and see how many of them you can come back to without them having to reload because Safari ran out of memory.App memory footprint may have grown but not exponentially, and iPad memory and performance has also grown - I have about 40 windows (including about 72 safari tabs) open across 8 desktops/spaces on my Mac right now using 24 GB of memory - 8 total windows should be manageable for an iPad Pro with an A12X and 4 GB of memory ....
Would you really want to use it tho?No love for the iPad Mini, a device still on sale which has the newest generation chip ever in an iPad (newer than M1 even) and faster performance than A12X/Z. The processor and ram are clearly not bottlenecks, so it comes down to a decision by Apple to not support it.
So the whole “older iPad Pros can’t handle stage manager” was just BS from apple?
As I said back then, one important limit, if not the main one, is the fact that only M1 can support 5k/6k displays.What is the true limit? Why not the Air 4? RAM constraints? It’s difficult to explain this at this point. The Standard A12 cannot run it? How much RAM is really needed? Is 4GB not enough? 1st gen 12.9-inch iPad Pro? 2nd gen iPad Pros? What’s the real technical cutoff?
I reckon that the only iPad Pro that might be truly, technically inadequate to run it is the 9.7-inch iPad Pro, 2GB of RAM might actually be too little. As for the rest? Pro and non-Pros, I’m not sure. After Apple faltered on their explanation, I don’t think we can identify the true lower bound specs required.
The M1 iPad Air which does support it has the same screen size as the iPad Air 4Might also be more about display size. I don’t think the feature would work well on anything smaller than 11”.
Also the Pros have upgraded video hardware.
Ram is an issue which is why you get less than 50% of its capabilities.As a 2020 iPad Pro owner I knew this would happen lol. There was no way stage manager would only work with M1+ but you had people here saying that chip had special bandwidth or whatever that the other chips didn’t have and that’s why it was exclusive. What a load of crap.
The 2018/2020 iPads are still plenty powerful today will be for years to come. They will keep going strong until RAM becomes an issue.
The way 99 percent of the 10 percent who care will use it. HahaAccording to Engadget, external display support will still require an M1 iPad.
2018 and 2020 iPad Pros will only be able to use Stage Manager with the built-in display.
I know right? 🤦🏻♂️Glad they are supporting older devices, but my Air 4 with a newer A14 and the same 4GB RAM doesn't make the cut I guess? Whack.
Imagine the same company said this and also kept the series 3 Apple Watch around for ….5 yearsI always took at as "Older models will not perform well with the feature as is and it would take a lot of resources that we currently dedicating to other features to make it work acceptably for older models."
I don't see it as a lie exactly - just not full disclosure. I'm glad that they have decided to extend this to other recent iPP models.
It’s not even on by default iirc.I hope I can disable it (iPad Pro 2018). I don't need a bad Window manager like Stage manager but a fullscreen Terminal, Xcode, VSCode and configurable keyboard shortcuts like in macOS
Unfortunately, this isn’t true when it came to disallowing editing and deletion of iMessages. Even after victim advocacy groups expressed concerns of potential abuse by perpetrators by deleting or editing their harassing messages, Apple didn’t give users a way to opt out. https://9to5mac.com/2022/06/15/imessage-edit-delete-button-issues/If you complain enough, Apple will eventually listen!
Because some do care how apple tweak their experience? Because some do wish apple do Better but choose to express hate in a way to pressure apple? Or simply because they care apple as a company like we care about a stranger, and don’t give a **** about how they feel?What I don't understand is given the vast amount of hate, why are these people buying Apple products?
I didn't see an M1 requirement for the Ventura Stage Manager, but this thread covers running Ventura on unsupported Macs.Any chance this means they'll extend it (& Ventura) to older Intel iMacs?
My understanding is a little different. What I understand is that by limiting external support and reducing by half the number of apps active in Stage manager, they are able to extend the feature to older iPads. Maybe it is still all BS, but I think this is the logic to justify the change.So the whole “older iPad Pros can’t handle stage manager” was just BS from apple?
iPad Mini 6 would be nice... Yep, even with the smaller screen.
The most recent beta of iPadOS 16.1 expands the controversial Stage Manager feature to older iPads, allowing it to work with iPad Pro models that have an A12X or A12Z chip, according to information Apple provided to Engadget.
![]()
The beta also removes the external display support from Stage Manager for the current time, with the feature set to return in a later iPadOS 16 update. Apple's statement on the matteruring the iPadOS 16 beta testing period, Stage Manager has been limited to the M1 iPad Pro models that were released in 2021, and the M1 iPad Air. Every other iPad was unable to use the feature, including 2018 and 2020 iPad Pro models that use the A12X and A12Z chips. Apple maintained that it was not able to offer acceptable performance on non-M1 iPads because the feature requires "large internal memory, incredibly fast storage, and flexible external display I/O" provided by the M1 iPad models.
Apple was reportedly unsatisfied with the Stage Manager experience on older iPad Pro models. "Certainly, we would love to bring any new experience to every device we can, but we also don't want to hold back the definition of a new experience and not create the best foundation for the future in that experience. And we really could only do that by building on the M1," said Apple's Craig Federighi.
Apple has received ongoing criticism for limiting such a major feature to its newest hardware, leading the company to figure out a way to expand the functionality to additional iPads. The removal of the external display feature in Stage Manager may be what is allowing Apple to offer a suitable experience on non-M1 hardware, but when external display support is reintroduced, it will be limited to the M1 iPad models and will not be available on the 2018 and 2020 iPad Pros.
Stage Manager is now available on all M1 iPads along with the 11 and 12.9-inch iPad Pro models from 2018 and 2020, so long as the latest iPadOS 16.1 beta is installed. Note that Apple is calling this beta iPadOS 16 beta 10.
Article Link: New iPadOS 16.1 Beta Expands Stage Manager to Older iPad Pro Models, Delays External Display Support
Sure, i just dont want the annoying vertical black bars on the external display.I don't think mirror is the word you want. Most iPads can already mirror - what you want is the ability to fully use a secondary display by using it as your primary or secondary desktop with fullscreen, split-vew, and slide-over.
Edit: Mirroring means the external display is limited to the same resolution as the iPad's built in display, which doesn't work well when trying to use a widescreen 5K external display.
That is messier looking than it needs to be. Because they didn’t implement a Mission Control/expose style window viewer they have to keep all apps partially visible - it would make more sense to be able to put windows fully on top of each other some times.At least they figure this out. View attachment 2082303
Game, mail, team and of course safari running and game available to play on its own simultaneously. This is what stage manager should’ve been when it’s fully available, better than split view, slide over and all.
Here is another example:
View attachment 2082309