Well, that would obsolete a lot of very expensive docking devices like speaker systems which can run into the hundreds of dollars. I for one would not be happy, but I really do not see this happening. The Apple connector standard is now ubiquitous in the market from speakers to cars. I just don't see it happening. There is no benefit to Apple and it would slow adoption through upgrade.
Yes, it's making progress. Have you tried watching Netflix on a 3.5"? If so, it's horrible. Have you tried it on a 4.3" screen? It's much better. We use our phones for media consumption way more than 2007. We NEED a bigger screen.Making phones bigger is 'progress'?? That's funny because 15 years ago making phones ever-smaller was considered progress. No, it's just the latest fad. Apple could so very easily have made the original iPhone bigger—there's nothing difficult or magical about that—but they didn't. They chose the size that they obviously believed provided the best balance between screen real-estate and ergonomics, and many users happen to think they got it pretty right. (I wouldn't mind seeing the screen slightly bigger, but not if it makes the device any wider.)
For most people? You would have done better saying iOS users. And thats what I'm talking about, I don't mind if they keep it the same size, just increase the screen size. I'm not saying they need to make the phone thicker, etc.Sorry, but the current overall size is perfect for MOST people. If they can keep the phone the same size and increase the screen size, then I'm all for it. Otherwise, stop whining and just go buy a ridiculous Samsung Note.
Large screen devices are only selling well in the US, where for some stupid reason dick size matters, ie. SUVs; Most every place else in the world, mobility and efficiency rule, unless those options aren't practical and a larger off road vehicle is required... that doesn't mean driving to Starbuck's for a coffee or traversing through the McDonald's drive-thru for another Big Mac.
Unless you're blind or have huge fat fingers, large screen phones that you need to carry around with you are just added bulk and a nuisance.
If they do change the dock connector, I hope it is to a Magsafe design. No more knocking devices off a surface if you catch the charging cable (which is too short anyway).
While all that is true, a new incompatible plug is a pretty cheap and reliable way to add a brick to the wall of the walled garden, while adding some insanely great RDF perceived value. TB will do that no matter the strategy, so whether it is an existing 30 pin plug with a couple of enabled leads, or an entirely new plug requiring an adapter for legacy Apple Ecosystem products, we can expect Apple to go down that path. FW, FW800, MDP, TB, and even the magnetic power cord, all proprietary with limited non OSX adoption.I do not like the idea of another port. I have spent hundreds of dollars on iPhone, iPad and iPod speakers and chargers for office, home and car. I can only imagine the tons and tons of waste that will go into the landfills just because of a single new connector. What about Europe's effort to make all mobile devices use the same plugs and chargers. If anything a new iPhone connector would just be adding yet another kind of plug to the mix.
Thunderbolt is not designed to fill the role of USB. It's made to cover the niche market of high speed data transferring such as external SDD's, HDD's, external GPU's/Apple Cinema Display and other things of that nature.
I think to have a magsafe connector on the iphone would be a waste cause the iphone is way to lite to be able to work the way it should...
James
Here's why I don't think that would be smart. Let's take an analogous situation. Think back to 4:3 TVs. When widescreen DVDs were released, you had one of two things happening on your TV screen. Either the DVD player would distort the image by squishing it into the screen or the DVD player would have to display the image with two horizontal black bars above and below the image. Similarly, when you try to display a 4:3 image on a 16:9 or 16:10 screen, either you need to squash the image, or you need to display two vertical black bars on the left and right of the image. The only other possibility in either of these circumstances is to cut up, or blow up, the image to fit the screen. Neither of these scenarios yields an optimal and elegant result. They are all terrible and ugly. The moral is: You don't want to force the native resolution of one screen onto another screen with a different native resolution that isn't optimally suited for the first screen's resolution. That strikes me as a non-starter and I don't think Apple would ever allow such a thing. If you can point to precedent showing otherwise, I'll happily retract my claim.
So where does that leave us? Well, that would mean each app would have to be designed, in its layout, for each display. That introduces a lot of fragmentation into the iOS environment. Tweaking the layout is very different from simply quadrupling the resolution of the images yet keeping the same layout. That is precisely why the work done to go from low-res to high res was small and pale in comparison to having to design software for 3.5" iPhones and design software for all other sizes at the same time. The same reasoning applies to iPad and the rumored 7" mini iPad.
Yes but that is different, and I'll explain why in a moment.
Here's why I don't think that would be smart. Let's take an analogous situation. Think back to 4:3 TVs. When widescreen DVDs were released, you had one of two things happening on your TV screen. Either the DVD player would distort the image by squishing it into the screen or the DVD player would have to display the image with two horizontal black bars above and below the image.
That day may be this Fall, when they release the new iPhone, but so far as I can tell, right now, there isn't any advantage to these bigger screens as far as making a better phone is concerned. The downsides outweigh the pros. When the scale turns, things may be different.
Making phones bigger is 'progress'?? That's funny because 15 years ago making phones ever-smaller was considered progress. No, it's just the latest fad.
Sorry, but the current overall size is perfect for MOST people. If they can keep the phone the same size and increase the screen size, then I'm all for it. Otherwise, stop whining and just go buy a ridiculous Samsung Note.
Unless you're blind or have huge fat fingers, large screen phones that you need to carry around with you are just added bulk and a nuisance.
Thunderbolt is an i/o standard. It's a competitor to USB 3.
I think to have a magsafe connector on the iphone would be a waste cause the iphone is way to lite to be able to work the way it should...
Wow, I love that idea. especially for all the 3rd party docs i.e bose etc
Well, that would obsolete a lot of very expensive docking devices like speaker systems which can run into the hundreds of dollars. I for one would not be happy, but I really do not see this happening. The Apple connector standard is now ubiquitous in the market from speakers to cars. I just don't see it happening. There is no benefit to Apple and it would slow adoption through upgrade.
But most apps are largely made up of scrollable lists, if the horizontal resolution remains the same adjusting to a greater height would be rather trivial.
I believe articles have been posted on this very site that have made mention that they could enlarge the screen without doing that. It just all depends on what size they do. I would expect any size increase from Apple to be on the conservative side. So I don't see this as an issue at all.
There might not be an advantage to you, but there would be to me..and frankly Apple as in addition to all the other Apple products I have bought, I would now buy an iPhone too. This size issue is the one thing holding me back. And yes, it IS that important to me. It is a dealbreaker. I will never go back to a smaller sized screen. Not now, not ever.
It's not a fad...it's called USEFUL SCREEN REAL ESTATE. I don't know why people don't understand this. I suspect they have never used a phone with a larger screen and do not understand the benefits.
So I'll ask the question again that no one ever seems to answer...why should someone have to go to an entirely different platform in order to get a larger screen? That notion is ridiculous. (and a lost sale too).
So? Because you have a custom made product, Apple shouldn't do what they think is best to improve their products?
So if I just made myself custom case for my iPhone, I should probably not expect Apple to re-design the phone, just for me!
No. Even if they do change it, companies will run like mad to design something fitting for the new design, and soon enough, they will all have made a new product fitting for the new device.
I mean... Things change, it happens. Some people lose, yes, but some people win. It always happens.
So, currently the iPhone uses 10% of the bandwidth of USB 2 but adding TB (of whose bandwidth the iPhone would use 1%) would help TB? Why not add TB to keyboards and mice?I don't mind if the dock connector is smaller or not, I'd rather they focus on implementing a new Thunderbolt connector for the iPhone (and all iDevices in the future). They need to push on it a bit more, and what better way than with their own products? Make it the standard.
While this may or may not be true, with capacities of iDevices getting larger, a Thunderbolt sync would be amazing. USB 2.0 is way too slow for large syncs.
**** will hit the fan if Apple doesn't redesign the next iPhone.
A world in which Apple would, eg, make an 11", a 12", a 13", a 14", a 15", a 16" and a 17" Macbook would not be a perfect world. It has been proven time and again that too much choice makes consumers less happy (they feel more stressed when making the purchasing decision and they later have nagging thoughts about having chosen the right one).In a perfect world Apple would make every size, shape, and color we could imagine, with all the hardware included within it customizable.
That is not correct, FW400 was much faster than USB 1, which was still what 95+% of all new computers had when the original iPod was released. The move to USB 2 later did not lead to speed reduction. No iPod or iOS device has come close to saturating the USB 2 bandwidth in my experience.So is FW and the FW on the original iPad was superior to the current USB 2 based dock connector in the speed aspect. Like FW and USB, TB is hot swappable so I'm not really sure what you are trying to say when it uses "daisy chain".
Active cables (that have a chip inside) will always be more expensive than cables that just route wires.As far a the price of cables, when FW and USB first came out the cables were the same price as TBs are now adjusted for inflation.
You want internet on the go with a screen bigger than 3.5"? The answer is simple. Get an iPad with 3G capability.
----------
Well then, perhaps you will be singing a different tune once you get older and your eyesight gets worse.The selfish single minded mindset around here really astounds me. There's no reason that there cannot be different sizes for different people's needs. There are different sized clothes, for a reason...different sized everything. There is nothing about this product that warrants it being only in one size and by doing so, Apple hands over customers (like me) to the competitors by default.
I want to see something new. Something that makes me go "Wow, I want that.". A cool new design and some kick-ass features.
But hey. If they don't, I'll just buy a different brand.![]()