VanNess said:Actually, I thought they bore an uncanny resemblance to the switch commercials, i.e., the casually dressed (at least one of them, although he looked like he got kicked out of a Gap commercial) ordinary, everyday spokesperson against a nondescript opaque background, non-intrusive background music score, and so on. Obviously not the rebirth of the switch campaign, but more of a folksy extension of it - whatever that means lol.
Gandalf! said:I must agree that having new Mac commercials is a great start. Personally, I would prefer commercials showing off Tiger. Why not have a 30 second spot showing someone opening iPhoto, creating a slideshow and previewing it? It could be done in 30 seconds and would show everyone how quick and easy it would be to do. You could have another commercial opening dashboard adding a new very useful app. It would show the ripple effect, which is just cool, and something useful at the same time (like a stock quote widget or something). You could add a third commercial showing off spotlight. The Macs and Tiger is fast enough to get a lot of info out there in a short ad. IMHO
VanNess said:And would it hurt to actually show the god damn product!? Like expose in action? Or dashboard in action? Or the dock in action? Or minimized windows in action? One of the Mac's main selling points is not only is it beautiful to look at, but it's actually fun to use.
A bunch of stuff moving on a blurry TV screen isn't going to tell anyone anything. People won't even think about whether they are looking at a computer interface as it REALLY is... or just some TV effects. A TV ad that asks people to study and retain details is a failure.DeathChill said:The ripple effect in Dashboard is quite eye catching and just some various other screens of Mac OS X in action cutting to a tiger swallowing the computer.
A print ad CAN show details of an OS, because the viewer can take her time and focus on what's interesting to her, absorbing at her own pace. Plus a print ad has higher resolution than a computer screen... but a TV has less (unreadable). Put that Time magazine spread about OS X features on a TV and you have a mess--an animated mess, but one that conveys the details of OS X's power LESS well than the print ad.VanNess said:Since we are talking about advertising, which would you rather see? This Time magazine ad? Or that same ad in action?
THAT is exactly what the ads need to do. Get people wondering that very thing. No TV can answer that question effectively--but a TV ad CAN support a larger campaign that includes those answers. Especially the new Get A Mac sub-site.Billy Boo Bob said:I'm glad to see them advertising again, but for those that have never really been exposed to a Mac it still leaves them wondering "What's a Mac?".
mackeeper said:Am I the only one who thinks these commercials are lame? The acting and writing is terrible.
A better ad would have been to have the regular ipod commercial with music. And then in comes a Macbook, and then an iMac, and so on, into the commercial. Much simpler, much more savvy, and a lot more convincing.
Thread rating so far: 155 Positives; 37 Negatives.mackeeper said:Am I the only one who thinks these commercials are lame? The acting and writing is terrible.
mackeeper said:Am I the only one who thinks these commercials are lame? The acting and writing is terrible.
A better ad would have been to have the regular ipod commercial with music. And then in comes a Macbook, and then an iMac, and so on, into the commercial. Much simpler, much more savvy, and a lot more convincing.
swingerofbirch said:Since everyone is giving a review, I'll jump on.
When Steve Jobs was brought back onto the board in 97 and he spoke at Macworld, he said that we need to give up the idea that in order for Apple to win Microsoft has to lose. He implored people to get over themselves when they booed at Microsoft bailing Apple out.
Now, these ads don't go after Microsoft but rather "PCs." But the same element of duplicity is here. I don't like it.
Apple should focus on positive messages, parlaying the popularity and hipness of iPod to Mac.
Plus, the ads have too many words. The iPod ads worked because there are no words. Cool people don't need to say it: show it. Show the energy.
But where exactly did she pull that image from?? 😱After G said:I liked the networking ad. Funny. 😀
I think you're right on first viewing--they are not flashy and exciting like the iPod ads--but these will be repeated and some ideas will sink in--maybe even for people who didn't consciously stop and take an interest at first.LaMerVipere said:I think these ads talk too much. Way too much to grab the attention of the average consumer, that is.
Exactly my first thought 😱 I thought "I didn't see what I THINK I just saw, did I?"evilgEEk said:But where exactly did she pull that image from?? 😱
I disagree.LaMerVipere said:I think these ads talk too much. Way too much to grab the attention of the average consumer, that is.
The only problem with a comment like that is that you can get a response relating to the price of Macs compared to PCs - for the uninitiated.🙄Ryan5505 said:"do you like maseratii or porshe"? idiots reponse,"yes". "how much marketshare do they own"? Room gets quite....
Don't forget they are aimed a potential switchers who don't spend their entire lives on these forums 😉Multimedia said:I agree. Incredibly BORING. What a waste of money. They will do NOTHING to increase sales. 😡
winmacguy said:The only problem with a comment like that is that you can get a response relating to the price of Macs compared to PCs - for the uninitiated.🙄
swingerofbirch said:Since everyone is giving a review, I'll jump on.
When Steve Jobs was brought back onto the board in 97 and he spoke at Macworld, he said that we need to give up the idea that in order for Apple to win Microsoft has to lose. He implored people to get over themselves when they booed at Microsoft bailing Apple out.
Now, these ads don't go after Microsoft but rather "PCs." But the same element of duplicity is here. I don't like it.
Apple should focus on positive messages, parlaying the popularity and hipness of iPod to Mac.
Plus, the ads have too many words. The iPod ads worked because there are no words. Cool people don't need to say it: show it. Show the energy.