Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
13" MBP used to have an option of 32GB. Mac Mini could be configured with up to 64GB.

Now they're both 16GB Max?????

They are totally useless to many professionals now. They've also reduced the number of ports.
Let's chill with the overreaction. I think its quite clear that the M1 doesn't need that much RAM, and that memory usage under Apple Silicon is a very different thing than on Intel.
 
It's a pity that this Macs seems to be capped to 16G of RAM !
What use case could you possibly need more than 16gb on an entry level macbook pro, or the low powered but energy efficientm acbook air?

These are intended for generally light use. If you're going to be needing more than 16gb of ram then i don't know why you'd get the entry level MBP or macbook air
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRobinsonJr
The air is a good deal. I'm leery about the 16gb cap in the Mini, mainly because a lot of Apple's stuff is memory-hungry. iTunes/music uses 750mb by itself. Then the two AMP processes are another 600MB. Maybe they fixed that on big sur.
 
I wonder if performance will be consistent across the lineup since they all use the same M1 chip, or if the MacBook Pro will have slightly better performance than the Air.

I originally wanted an iMac for my next Mac, but this makes upgrading my 2012 15” rMBP to a MacBook Air or a 13” MacBook Pro a more serious consideration.
Most likely similar performance until the pro gains the advantage by having active cooling.
 
13" MBP used to have an option of 32GB. Mac Mini could be configured with up to 64GB.

Now they're both 16GB Max?????

They are totally useless to many professionals now. They've also reduced the number of ports.
Macbook Pro is no longer for professionals. Just a machine for people to scroll through social media.
 
1 GPU core and I guess a slightly better display and I assume superior sustained performance?
Interesting that if toy go to the 512 model air you get that extra core to. I first assumed its be a no fan trade off but guess not.
 
In for a base air. Being a super first gen product, I just don't see the value in higher priced models.

Somehow, I feel like 8gigs of RAM is perfectly fine and I've never used Apple Care on a laptop, so if I love and keep the Air, I'll add within the 60 days.

Not bad for $899
 
But it won’t run most your software. Lol.
Agreed. But I've ALREADY had this problem since Mojave, so I've given up on Software. I'm considering it a brand new platform. My plan is to keep my old Mac around when I need to run older software.
 
On the laptop side it seems the pro is basically a waste. Right? It's got two hours more battery in exchange of being heavier and having a touch bar. Everything else is the same.

Did I miss something?
Will have to wait for benchmarks - if they're near identical in performance, then the MBP 13 seems a bit of a waste
 
13" MBP used to have an option of 32GB. Mac Mini could be configured with up to 64GB.

Now they're both 16GB Max?????

They are totally useless to many professionals now. They've also reduced the number of ports.
Who needs more thasn 16gb on apple's entry level laptops??

Surely if you need more than 16gb of ram, then you wouldn't be getting the entry level specs in all other ways.

You can still buy a brand new macbook with 32gb of ram with the i5, which i assume is more powerful than the M1? It is a bit odd if the m1 is more powerful, given than the i5 MBPs are significantly more expensive
 
brighter display, better mics, sustain loading wrokflow

Brighter Display: 400 vs 500 nits. K.
Better Mics: Both have three-mic arrays with directional beamforming. The pro is 'Studio-quality'. k...
Sustain loading workflow: because it has a fan? So it swaps performance duration for db?
 
You do realize that the actual concern is once intel is phased out of the lineup that 16gb will be a problem for many professionals. Keep up.

Well obviously the M2 will replace those systems. The M1 replaced the 8th gen Intel systems (which only had 16gb of ram) they're entry level models. The new chip will compete with the top end 10th gen intel chips and obviously have more ram capacity. It's not difficult to understand and work out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankeeD
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.