Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


Apple in 2016 removed all of the ports from its MacBook Pro models except for Thunderbolt ports, a design that persisted for years -- until today. The newly announced 2021 MacBook Pro models include an SD card slot and an HDMI port alongside three Thunderbolt ports.

2021-MBP-Profile-Feature-Yellow.jpg

As noted in Apple's technical specifications for the new machine, the HDMI port is unfortunately not top of the line -- it is an HDMI 2.0 port instead of an HDMI 2.1 port.

The HDMI 2.0 port supports a single 4K display with a resolution of up to 60Hz. HDMI 2.1 technology would have allowed the port to run a 4K display with a 120Hz refresh rate.

It's curious that Apple did not include HDMI 2.1 in the MacBook Pro models because the Apple TV 4K that was released earlier this year does have an HDMI 2.1 port.


With the Thunderbolt 4 ports, the M1 Pro MacBook Pro models overall support up to two external displays with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz. The M1 Max MacBook Pro models support up to three external displays with up to 6K resolution and one external display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz.

Article Link: New MacBook Pro Models Include HDMI 2.0 Port Instead of HDMI 2.1
Stop the whining there is a simple solution USB Type-C to HDMI 2.1 for $30 at Amazon.
The HDMI is so you can easily connect it to a projector/TV that is found in nearly every conference room in the country. No need for 120Hz.

https://www.amazon.com/Sabrent-Func...cphy=1021048&hvtargid=pla-1265312912769&psc=1
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Completely a bandwidth based decision.

There are almost certainly 4 TB4/PCIe4 channels. The fourth one is likely split between the SD card and the HDMI port (and perhaps a couple other peripherals, we'll have to see what System Information says next week). HDMI 2.1 utilizes up to 48Gb, TB4 has a 40Gb channel. You do the math. Even with the SD card using only a lane or two, a lot of the HDMI 2.1 benefits wouldn't be there.

On a side note, this is a good example of "you get what you ask for". Instead of having the fourth TB4 port and the flexibility to do what we want with it, the dongle-haters have prevailed and now we lose the flexibility. SMDH.
Wouldn’t you get the option of 120hz with hdmi 2.1?
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: visualseed
I feel I’m with you, but I think I like having Touch Bar back. I’m just now sitting down to watch the keynote but it sounds like it’s needed to support higher power delivery of the Pro/Max chips.
I miss the Touch Bar, Fn keys are useless in comparison, but Apple released it and didn’t do much with it after that, which is on them.
 
It really should have been an HDMI input to connect to pro video cameras for recording.

And HDMI adapters are flaky and unreliable. It should have been a first party feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: toke lahti
Completely a bandwidth based decision.

There are almost certainly 4 TB4/PCIe4 channels. The fourth one is likely split between the SD card and the HDMI port (and perhaps a couple other peripherals, we'll have to see what System Information says next week). HDMI 2.1 utilizes up to 48Gb, TB4 has a 40Gb channel. You do the math. Even with the SD card using only a lane or two, a lot of the HDMI 2.1 benefits wouldn't be there.

On a side note, this is a good example of "you get what you ask for". Instead of having the fourth TB4 port and the flexibility to do what we want with it, the dongle-haters have prevailed and now we lose the flexibility. SMDH.
Umm, I don’t like the second half of your comment but I digress And hit a like anyways.
If apple somehow manages to slip 5 or more TB4 channels in the future, there would be better usage out of it. Btw, dongle adds point of failure, whereas built in one is generally considered better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nvmls
I don't get why you would bring back things that have been gone for years. Everyone has adapted to life without these and it is fine, people will always complain but to me, I would gladly give up MagSafe/HDMI/SD for more USB-C.

Next apple will bring back the Newton

Although I do love them bringing back MagSafe, they never should have got rid of it in the first place. Get rid of HDMI and SD, sure, but I love me some MagSafe! :D
 


Apple in 2016 removed all of the ports from its MacBook Pro models except for Thunderbolt ports, a design that persisted for years -- until today. The newly announced 2021 MacBook Pro models include an SD card slot and an HDMI port alongside



Does anyone know if Apple’s SDXC card reader will support Compact Express A cards, like the ones from Sony cameras? Supposedly it’s just a software decision.
 
I figure most people with higher-end monitors have been using DisplayPort for a long time anyway?

Like the SD card slot, I see the HDMI port as a "built-in dongle". It's there to serve a specific common usage: interfacing with HDMI gear such as projectors.
You can buy a cable with different ends. It is penny pinching at best, cheap ass at worst and how many people never use the HDMI port on their laptop and is not even 2.1. An extra Thunderbolt 4 port or 2 would have been a better choice, looking forward. We pay a premium for these devices and they shouldn't be cheapening them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
You have to be braindead to buy a Mac nowadays. They're all a one-trick pony device and moving to Arm solidified that fact. Your favorite iOS toy + Windows PC is a much better combo.
 
Completely a bandwidth based decision.

There are almost certainly 4 TB4/PCIe4 channels. The fourth one is likely split between the SD card and the HDMI port (and perhaps a couple other peripherals, we'll have to see what System Information says next week). HDMI 2.1 utilizes up to 48Gb, TB4 has a 40Gb channel. You do the math. Even with the SD card using only a lane or two, a lot of the HDMI 2.1 benefits wouldn't be there.

On a side note, this is a good example of "you get what you ask for". Instead of having the fourth TB4 port and the flexibility to do what we want with it, the dongle-haters have prevailed and now we lose the flexibility. SMDH.


Can I still use the HDMI port and one of the TB4 port to drive two 4K displays at 60Hz?
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
It’s actually for people that use it with an external monitor using hdmi without having to buy an adapter.
I get it is annoying, but I don’t about using an adapter for a home or office setup. If I can leave a small dodge on the hdmi cord, then there is functionally no difference.

Built in hdmi adapter is nice for visits to other offices for projecting, hooking up to crappy monitors or using a hotel tv as a second screen. I can do this today via an adapter, but I guess it is nice for travel. Not a big deal for my use case either way as I’ll almost certainly never use the hdmi port except in those rare circumstances. I’ll still need to take my ethernet/usb a/hdmi dongle everywhere as most conference rooms I go to have usb-a conference audio devices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
It's curious that Apple did not include HDMI 2.1 in the MacBook Pro models because the Apple TV 4K that was released earlier this year does have an HDMI 2.1 port.
Explanation can be very simple:
M-mbp's are FIRST GEN products.
They have been in development way longer than just an update to an existing product.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.