I'm curious if the CTO ones are the most likely to be defective since they come straight out of Shanghai with seemingly no quality control in between.
I have a CTO machine and it's fine. Your case is the exception, not the norm, as much as you may like to believe it is.
People have issues and they come here to complain. People who don't have issues have no reason to come to complain about anything, so the ratio seems outrageously bias towards negative responses.
Are people receiving poor quality MacBooks? Sure. Is everyone? No. Are 90% of them unacceptable? Nope. Are 50%? Nope.
MacRumors is NOT, as unfortunate as this may sound to you, the best pool to base any statistics on. Normal consumers don't come here, or even know of its existence. These consumers probably think that everyone is receiving perfect notebooks, just as we all seem to think no one is. We are all subject to our environment, and this is no exception.
So yes, while you may have a 100% failure rate so far - many, many more have walked away 100% satisfied.
I have, and many others have. You just don't hear us. Complainers are louder than praisers.
While I feel for you and your misfortune, there's no reason to jump to conclusions about quality control. I've gone through 4 360's. They began to die around 6 months after manufacturing, so it's going to take a lot to make me think anyone's quality control is awful.
This stuff happens with new designs. Manufacturing processes have to be zeroed in on, they don't just start off perfect. As Rev A adopters, we're the beta testers. Expect problems, they're only natural.