I tend to agree with you diehardmacfan. However, for those of you who think the FSB will run at 800 MHz, please think again. There is currently a memory controller on the SR chipset which limits the FSB to 667MHz. Thus the reason SR will be revised for Penryn--besides the fact that Penryn takes a completely different socket.
The MBPs must go SR if they are to receive higher clocked chips. My guess is the MBPs will clock in at 2.2 and 2.4 GHz--that's as high as the revised Merom chip clocks stock, but it has a revised microarchitecture so it should perform better than the GHz indicate. The big update will be the LED screen--but Apple is not first here--with an increase in HDD size (and speed?) and a newer gfx card. But looking at the MBP's spec.s, it is hard to really showcase anything to the average consumer other than the new screen (if it is really any better in color reproduction). Otherwise, most improvements will likely be minor and will mainly reduce power consumption and thus increase performance per watt.
I would like a new enclosure and the inclusion of DisplayPort. The former is possible, but the latter may have to wait for Penryn/SR (in late '07) or Penryn/Montevina (in '08) when gfx card manufacturers start to include the port on their standard cards.
I also expect WWDC to showcase a new iMac and Leopard primarily, possibly new HD displays.
Hmm, where do I start with the inaccuracies in this post???
You were told on this
, but you still want to argue, 1st you say there's no 800Mhz mem available, and when you are corrected, you whine about how it's too expensive for most to upgrade to 4GB. That's your choice; back in 1995 I had to pay $330, doing a price search, for 32MB of RAM for my Powermac 7200, and I needed every last MB of that, as Netscape was a memory hog, same with HP's Deskjet 855C printer drivers so poorly written for OS8/9! Yeah at the time 64GB was really expensive, but people who want or need that much should have the choice.
Besides, you're not knowledgeable about who buys these Apple laptops to speculate about what the market is for 4GB of 800Mhz SODIMM, Crucial is a 'name' brand so it's going to cost a bit more, Apple will charge you even more> btw. price has already dropped to $265 per 2GB module for the Crucial at their site. Soon as the SR PC laptops ship in numbers, I'll bet the price will drop some more (PC side being the driving economic force) in the next few months. So stop whining, and stop promoting false info.
[url]http://www.crucial.com/store/partspecs.aspx?imodule=CT25664AC80E
Cite you authority for the fact that the mem. controller in SR will not support 800Mhz DDR2 SODIMM's, it makes no sense to up the FSB to support running at 800Mhz if there will be no memory supported to take advantage of it...think man, think! Doh.
gfx card??? Huh, this ain't no Mac Pro, there is no
gamer card, the MBP has a non-removable
GPU at present, and for the near future-no 'card'.
As much needed updated GPU, 2.4Ghz CPU,
Thus the reason SR will be revised for Penryn--besides the fact that Penryn takes a completely different socket.
Umm, non-sequitur; please cite your sources to support this contorted logic, lol!
Cite your source for the proposition that laptops have to go to SR to use higher frequency Meroms. Are you telling us aftermarket upgrade companies like Daystar will never have 2.6Ghz Meroms running as an upgrade service they provide (authorized Apple service center) in older 1st gen 2GHz MBP's?
Pretty good 'guess', lol, that 2.4Ghz Merom will be in the updated MBP, since Apple is once again behind the PC world in annoucing, we already know 2.4Ghz is current top speed they are available in (though if the heat could be managed, July is speculated to be the release of the user over-clockable mobile x7700 @stock of 2.6Ghz for July? As a top end model, though, considering you wouldn't be buying 4GB of RAM for you non-intensive, no pro apps uses, you wouldn't want the minor extra speed from 2.6Ghz CPU.
Combine 800Mhz memory, FSB, 2.6Ghz CPU, Nvidia 8400M? that alone would be a bigger upgrade than a LED backlit LCD, IMHO. Would be nice to get the 200GB Hitachi 7.2k HD, I'd take the recently announced 64GB 1.8in Samsung SSD as an option any day though, faster still. Next year even faster 256GB SSD's, that no magnetic recording HD can touch in performance, will be the hot ticket for those who can afford them.
Intel mobile Core 2 Extreme, price cuts leaked
Intel Mobile CPU Price Cut In Sep
Core 2 Duo T7800 @ 2.6Ghz, maybe the next updated MBP in Sept. with
2k res screens....finally, which would ship around the same time Leopard is released. MBP will almost certainly be revised at least one more time before any Penryn systems are on the horizon.