"SOME" people....which is why apple will never be a big contender in the marketshare. The microsoft ad is a good example bc most (avg computer consumers) aren't going to be willing to pay the price of a used car for a computer.
1. MSFT hit a homerun with this ad. I enjoy watching so many get so upset about a commercial. Overanalyzing, dissecting and getting offended - must have struck a nerve
2. I run XP Pro SP3 along with leopard and have never had the windows issues that you all claim that plagues all PCs
3. Calling all Macs well built is the overstatement of the year. My g/f's macbook is a POS. I would never buy a desktop w/ laptop parts either so...
4. Aside from certain models like the MPro, PC's are almost always comparably cheaper
5. I used to own an M3 and driven a 360 Spider. Macs are not comparable to them, so please stop using the ridiculous car analogies.
6. People buy what they can afford. Average consumer doesn't see the sense of paying extra for the luxury of using OS X (especially in this climate)
7. Many use windows at work, it's convenient for them to have seemless compatability and familiarity in their home environment
8. Mac does not offer many choices. It's worked thus far, but will they have to adjust in this new economic climate?
9. A lot of people cant afford or dont care for the value add that Macs supposedly furnish. It doesnt make them any worse consumers.
10. People who do enjoy and pay more for the macs aren't bad consumers either
11. TCO argument is silly. Since when do Americans concern themselves with TCO? this is evidenced by the exponentially improved sales #'s of the subsidized iphone 3G and luxury vehicles
For the umpteenth time, you do realize that I live in Sweden and not in Cupertino, right? Please, do call Apple Sweden and ask them for such a "prepaid box", and tape the conversation. If you end up talking to the same person I did, she will probably laugh for about 15 minutes.Oh and PS, it takes no effort to activate your APP and have Apple ship a box to get your iMac fixed. I realize I am most likely baiting you with further debate (which I will not respond to, I have better things to do, such as sleep), but again your comments have no logic. If you purchased APP, Apple will honor it, and if you can not get to an Apple store (as most people can not), Apple sends prepaid packing for repairs.
The fact Microsoft focuses on the price only is a proof they know they sell worse products. As people in the IT business said, Microsoft doesn't put any culture in their third-rate stuff. I remember an old "I'm a Mac/I'm a PC" ad underlined that Microsoft prefers to spend on commercials than to software enhancements.
Brilliant ad by Microsoft.
I love apple, BUT the simple fact is that they don't make a sub thousand dollar laptop, and they force people to choose screen size based on other features and price, not screen size alone. The simple fact of the matter is I should be able to buy a macbook with the internal specs of the 13 inch model, but with a larger screen.. and I should be able to buy a 13 inch mackbook pro. Apple won't give me these choices. PC manufacturers do.
BTW if I see one more person claim that leopard only costs $129 I'm going to start tearing throats out. The Leopard UPGRADE is $129. Leopard is not for sale, though if you consider it part of the apple tax, I'd have to guess that its around $350-400.
Do we have to go through this for every MS ad? They're not selling any "product" this time either, it's neither an ad for the computer in question, nor for Vista, it's a profile ad in the "Windows - Life Without Walls" series. They're just random snapshots (carefully chosen obviously, but you know what I mean) of the presence of Windows in daily life. Today it's a chick buying a laptop, tomorrow it can be about a guy who hooked a Windows smartphone up to a diving suit to make the world's weirdest sex doll. Well, no. But something less R-rated. Along the way, wrapped in these semi-random clips are various seeds they want to plant in people's heads. In this one they were more obvious than usual: Apple = too cool and aloof for the average Joe, bigass 17" laptop = not the pipe dream I thought it was. The message was not "buy this specific HP laptop for $699 and get Windows Vista, limited time only!".The worst mistake a company can make is advertising about price only and NOT mentioning anything about the actual quality of the product.
Brilliant ad by Microsoft.
I love apple, BUT the simple fact is that they don't make a sub thousand dollar laptop, and they force people to choose screen size based on other features and price, not screen size alone. The simple fact of the matter is I should be able to buy a macbook with the internal specs of the 13 inch model, but with a larger screen.. and I should be able to buy a 13 inch mackbook pro. Apple won't give me these choices. PC manufacturers do.
BTW if I see one more person claim that leopard only costs $129 I'm going to start tearing throats out. The Leopard UPGRADE is $129. Leopard is not for sale, though if you consider it part of the apple tax, I'd have to guess that its around $350-400.
The worst mistake a company can make is advertising about price only and NOT mentioning anything about the actual quality of the product.
And the girl is a total idiot. But then again she represents the PC demographic in general.
The worst mistake a company can make is advertising about price only and NOT mentioning anything about the actual quality of the product.
And the girl is a total idiot. But then again she represents the PC demographic in general.
For the umpteenth time, you do realize that I live in Sweden and not in Cupertino, right?
Please, do call Apple Sweden and ask them for such a "prepaid box", and tape the conversation...
3) The only, I repeat *only* way to have the iMac repaired was that I transport it (or ship it *at my own expense*) to any service centre of my choosing.
4) I also asked if it was possible to drop it off for repairs but keep the hard disk, since there's material on there that relates to future products and should it be leaked somehow I'd have one hell of an NDA breach on my hands, and she said "no", I have to leave the whole kit'n'kaboodle.
Ok, first rule of correcting people, make sure that you have it right. The person you were correcting had it right and you were dead wrong on this point. You are comparing Apples and oranges. The Mac Pro is not just a desktop tower, it is a workstation class tower and if you were to compare even a Dell "workstation" with Quad-core Xeon processors with ECC RAM against a comparable Mac Pro configuration, the Mac Pro would be either cheaper or competitive on hardware alone. The iMac is also price competitive against PCs in the all-in-one category. Those Hackintoshes use desktop processor with non-ECC ram. If you don't know what those things are, then you are better off going with an 24" iMac which is more than enough for even most gamers.4. It's actually the iMac that is equivalent in price, the Mac Pro is one of the worst culprits for the "Apple Tax". Hence the rise of Hackint0sh and EFI-X
blah