Well they had to find some way to add a notch to the Apple Watch. Consistency across product lines!That bump on the side is kind of fugly. Not gonna lie
Well they had to find some way to add a notch to the Apple Watch. Consistency across product lines!That bump on the side is kind of fugly. Not gonna lie
Well considering the S7 in titanium is 799 and this is made of titanium, 1k sounds about right for that market.People will buy it anyway, even if it's $1000 ..
Wouldn't that be something? Too much smoke though IMOI'm gonna go on a limb and say that it'll look nothing like this. Even more, there are a bunch of designers at Apple Park laughing at the water cooler at these renderings.
All their consumer products begin with i for consistency. iPhone, iMac, iBook, iPod, iPad, iTV, etc.It is called Apple Watch, there has never been an iWatch
The stainless and titanium aren't just fancy versions for aesthetics. They also come with sapphire glass and tougher metals. One of the primary features of this Pro version is supposedly durability and ruggedness. You're not getting that with the base glass screen and aluminum case, both of which are a constant source of complaints even on these forums. It's gonna need the sapphire glass and tougher metal that's available on the stainless or titanium.Yes there are fancy versions to blow money on. But they are identical to their base counterparts minus shell and bands. Making the base pro over double the price to get a bigger screen and a button is 100% insane. If they try to justify it by making it out of something fancy then they are just gating features behind fluff. Be like if they made the 44mm model only made out of gold.
Don’t confuse features with design and aesthetics.
There should be a pro made out of the same materials as the non pro with the bigger screen and extra button and that should be 100-200 more max.
Your limb is about to break... better grab onto something.I'm gonna go on a limb and say that it'll look nothing like this. Even more, there are a bunch of designers at Apple Park laughing at the water cooler at these renderings.
but that won't give me my messages, or workout info, or email...... I could go on and on.... people buy an apple watch so they can have a computer on their wrist that links with their phone not simply to tell time.For the price of this watch, you could probably buy a Omega Speedmaster.
That’s what yo momma said.It's too big for me.
but that won't give me my messages, or workout info, or email...... I could go on and on.... people buy an apple watch so they can have a computer on their wrist that links with their phone not simply to tell time.
The AW team are full-on watch nerds...I've read a few interviews with them and they LOVE mechanical watches. That's why you see all the homages to traditional watches in the designs and graphics.But the Apple Watch doesn't let you cosplay as a lunar-bound astronaut. I'd take the Speedmaster.
On a more serious note, I suspect that the Apple Watch team have more than a passing interest in traditional watch design; there is more than a hint of that in the dial options (California, Chronograph, Count-Up, Explorer, GMT, World Time... surprised they don't have a Moonphase) and now, if the renders are correct, the crown guard design.
The AW team are full-on watch nerds...I've read a few interviews with them and they LOVE mechanical watches. That's why you see all the homages to traditional watches in the designs and graphics.
Sticking out, as if it's meant to be manipulable during an activity and/or while wearing gloves.Im trying my best to like it but that new physical button sticking out like a sore thumb...