Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've noticed that over the past 12 months or so, a majority of the Samsung smartphone ads I see are directly attacking Apple. I have also noticed that over the past year, Samsung's high end smartphone sales have actually decreased while Apple's sales are still skyrocketing. I'd be willing to bet those two facts aren't just coincidental.

I thought about getting a Note for a long time. Samsung's ads used to make their products seem really cool. I mean back in 2012 the Note II really was innovative in my opinion, and they spent most of their advertisements showing it's features. But now most of their ads just attack Apple. It doesn't make me want to buy a Samsung phone instead...

Honestly if I ran a smartphone company I would never waste so many hundreds of millions of advertising dollars just attacking my competitors. I would spend it making my products look as cool and desirable as I possibly could.
 
Last edited:
I like how Samsung made a smartphone. That's right! If Apple hadn't made the original iPhone, Samsung wouldn't have made any of it's phones. You can thank Apple for all of your devices.

Sincerely,
Who copied who now?
 
Wreaks of desperation.

Sadly for Samsung its marketing agency is much more creative than the company itself. :cool:






:apple:

I suspect something was lost in the translation from the original Korean.
Because it really doesn't fit the American TV market.
Feels like an attack ad during election time.
 
I know people who owned the Note 1 and 2. What a piece of trash. Yes, it has a bigger screen, but it's worse in every other regard. Samsung increased the DPI of their pentile screens last year which finally got rid of the horrible screen door look.

And I haven't gotten to Samsung's "software" yet...
 
The problem with this ad is that basically is an ad for Apple.

This commercial says, Apple has what we have had.

You can't sell based on what, a stylus? A screen showing two things on it?

This is pretty weak and to me, it reeks of despair.

The problem with despair is that it's a pretty stinky cologne.
 
I suspect something was lost in the translation from the original Korean.
Because it really doesn't fit the American TV market.
Feels like an attack ad during election time.

I'm Lee Kun-Hee and I approved this message. :D
 
The problem with this ad is that basically is an ad for Apple.

This commercial says, Apple has what we have had.

You can't sell based on what, a stylus? A screen showing two things on it?

This is pretty weak and to me, it reeks of despair.

The problem with despair is that it's a pretty stinky cologne.

Anti-Apple Marketing 101, Day 1, Lecture 1:

"You mention Apple, you lose..."
 
Apple sells a user experience, not just the gadget. Samsung will never get it. Android will never get it. And that's OK.

Google still has search, and all of the money they make from selling your private data to third parties. ("Don't be evil" yeah right)

Samsung still has TVs, as well as low end phones with low margins to a large part of the planet.

Apple will continue to make boatloads of money doing what they do best--making technology as seamless, easy, and fun as possible for the widest range of people. Does it have to be the most original stuff to give the most magical experience?

Take your grandma. Get her up and running in Android. Do the same in iOS. Ask yourself (and be really honest here)--which is she doing more in, quicker?

Not sure why Samsung feels the urge to run these ads. They should be asking themselves why so many people love their Apple products even if it makes them "wall huggers?" Could it be something about the total experience that Samsung clearly lacks?
 
The problem with this ad is that basically is an ad for Apple.

This commercial says, Apple has what we have had.

You can't sell based on what, a stylus? A screen showing two things on it?

This is pretty weak and to me, it reeks of despair.

The problem with despair is that it's a pretty stinky cologne.

I think so, although maybe it's just an attempt by the company to say that they aren't the only "copiers" in the market. Of course, screen size can't be patented. Technologically there isn't much different between a 4" screen and a 5.5" screen.
 
Apple was early then. And they are late now.
iPhone may be late by releasing the features that samsung already have for years, but those "same" features just works better on iPhone since apple spent longer time in researching before releasing them. On the other hand, samsung just want to lead the industry by introducing various new technologies, but none of them are as complete as apple's because samsung rushed the process...
 
Nuff said...

Image

Somehow I knew this picture would surface in this thread. Very sad. This pic is so disingenuous and misleading. There's no denying the level of similarity between the iphone and the GSII, but can we not use doctored images to prove our point? There are far more accurate representations that show the similarity of the form without changing the actual size of the GSII, and images that actually use home screen to home screen instead of the GSII app drawer. :rolleyes:

Hard to critize Samsungs ethical behavior when we engage in the same activity.

You're better than that.
 
Apple = better

Dear Samsung:
Is not just the size obviously apple knew about bigger sizes but the point is to make the things right
And i can say that apple is a way better, this is what i did:
I put my iPhone 5 aside and tried Galaxy Note 3 for 4 months and I end up selling it and reactivating my iPhone. here is why.
Pros of Galaxy:
Nice pictures
Great display
Cons:
OS updates: wait about 4 months for carrier to update a customized full of carrier Useless apps OS (AT&T)
Video too shaky, I couldn't get a good and stable video clip (stabilizer on)
Stylus - useless
a lot of functions like on screen sharing to TV was not simple as Airplay
Back ups are a hazle, multiple apps to get it done
I'll stop the list right here because there's not enough time for people to read it
 
Last edited:
I think so, although maybe it's just an attempt by the company to say that they aren't the only "copiers" in the market. Of course, screen size can't be patented. Technologically there isn't much different between a 4" screen and a 5.5" screen.

What about rectangles with rounded corners? :p
 
Apple was early then. And they are late now.

Not really. I had a Sony Ericsson P800 back in 2003. That was a smartphone with a fairly large touchscreen for the day. Heck, Nokia had a touchscreen phone about that time but then decided that the market didn't want one and so abandoned it.
 
Apple needs to stock up on burn cream. lol

I wish Samsung fans would do their homework before they think that Apple is being burned. Samsung internally ridiculed Apple for the original iPhone screen being too large.
Keep grasping at straws.
 
When you're the gold standard, you don't mention your competitor. Hence, why Apple rarely, if ever, mentions Samsung.

"Hello. I'm a Mac."

"And I'm a PC."

Wrong.

Their lameness aside, I relish in the fact that :apple:Pay isn't something Samsung will ever be able to copycat -- it's such a precise and deliberate blend of hardware, software (OS), patents, business deals, existing assets (credit cards via iTunes), etc.

Peace, Samsung.

Credit card via iTunes? Verses the credit cards through Google, Microsoft, Blackberry? What are you saying?

Is it me, or is writing with the S-Pen (while floating your hand in the air, apparently) actually slower than typing?

Oh, and Android Central had a "Look at Apple copying Samsung" article? GASP!!!!

It's not meant for typing. Hence the Wacom digitizer. It's meant for writing. Apple shows off people using photo applications drawing with their finger. I'd take a pen. Which is why a search for "Apple capacitive stylus" yields millions of results.

It's telling that Samsung sells more phones yet still feels a need to compare themselves to Apple.

I wish there were a good way for Apple to neutralize these ads without giving Samsung the time of day. Something like "some people feel the need to always compare, we just focus on making the best". Or "Some people consider us their competition, our only competition is mediocrity".

Apple doesn't neutralize ads. They don't need to, either. Look at everyone buying an iPhone 6/Plus. People will buy into advertising regardless that it existed years prior.

The truth is, you'd need a legitimate documentary to cover everything that Samsung actually has copied from Apple. Really, this is just a commercial to show how petty Samsung is, claiming to have originated the idea of mobile phones with screens far larger than the norm that had an initially mixed reception, when it was apple that made that move first.

The real kick is, they'll call out Apple while they, and everyone else knows that they aren't worth a quarter of a **** for Apple to respond to it.

Stay classy, Samsung.
You do it so well.

Let's go back to 2007 when Apple copied off of Microsoft and Nokia. Remember those wars? Or Apple stealing ideas from Xerox Parc. Remember any of that or did history of technology not reach your end of the internet?

The next big thing is here...the iPhone 6 Plus! Seriously Samsung, I wouldn't advertise a product that isn't coming out until October as being the next big thing that's here.

Well, Apple added NFC (existed on modern smartphones since 2010 in the Nexus S). Which, always did more than just mobile payments. But I'm sure Apple will release that next years WWDC.

Apple also touted the Apple Watch...That comes in 2015, undercutting your argument.

no wonder all there users are such dicks

Nah, Apple fans are just easy targets.

Apple does not innovate anymore. But when they do something, they do it right. My friends laughed at me when I mentioned the iPhone 6 is getting NFC. But I guarentee I will use my phone to pay for stuff more before 2014 ends, then they have with Google wallet in the past 3 years.

Because you'll choose to use it more?

That is exactly what I was going to say; they are trying to minimize the damage. They know they are going to lose a significant portion of market share and they have no way to offer anything else so they go on the attack. It's a basic principle of marketing/psychology/politics.

The worst of it for me was when they praised the Note for having a stylus while the iPhone Plus does not. We all know that if Apple did not introduce touch in 2007, we would have Google and Blackberry phones with styluses and keypads dominating the market to this day. Google's smartphone that was in development when the iPhone hit looked just like a mix between the Palm Pilot and Blackberry.

First, it's not necessarily Apple vs Samsung. Tim Cook said in the interview with Charlie Rose that they are rivaling Google. Also, the first touch screen smartphone wasn't brought to the market by Apple. It existed at least 7 years before the first iPhone came to market.

This would be another point to use against Droidheads if the Android fans who troll in every technology thread on the internet actually had taken the time they waste trolling to get an education so they could understand why your point is true in the first part.

Nah. It's just funny to see the full support of Apple lovers stroke each others hair trying to make each other feel as though their getting something great.

Apple innovates technology. Samsung copies it.

Do you really want to buy your phone and notebook/tablet/phablet/etc. from the same company that makes your washer, dryer, refrigerator, oven, dishwasher, etc.
LOL. how sad is that. more importantly, where's the cool factor?

Apple's already working on Samsung's next big thing.

Yes. I do. Because a company that builds more things has a better idea of the market. Hence the success of Samsung phones. The cool factor...? "Think different." Everything seems the same with Apple. Cool factor is being the same as everyone? Yeah. Okay. Looks like you are buying Apple products to fit in. Bad childhood?

What is Apple doing that Samsung is copying? Looks like the other way around. Welcome to a couple years ago.

Samsung ads make it clear that Apple is the market leader. Only a market follower calls out the competition by name. It's an axiom of advertising that you don't give free publicity to the competition unless you are trying to capture some of their glow.

And yes, when Apple ran the "PC" ads, Microsoft was the market leader, without a doubt.

The percentage of Microsoft computers is still dominating the market.



Another way Apple manipulates statistics for their gain:

Back when the iPhone came out, it was a success. A modern touch screen smartphone. Even though it lacked front facing camera (those existed before 2007), MMS (Steve Jobs said MMS was dead), multi-tasking (existed in Symbian phones and worked very well), app store (existed before the iPhone from other manufacturers too), it sold millions. Fast forward to the iPad. Steve Jobs said it was to fill the gap between phone and computer. It was never counted into Apple's marketshare of computers because, welll, it was a tablet. Then, when it suited Apple, they said a year later that OSX marketshare was top in the world. But, that is simply not true. Even if you did count all Apple "OSX" devices, it still doesn't come on top of Android. But, if you watch closely, they compare all OSX devices to just Microsoft PCs. So they took mobile statistics, and then started a comparison to all Windows PCs. How clever. And the media ate it up.
 
What about rectangles with rounded corners? :p

Design patents are different. Every car manufacturer has them, and so does Samsung. That line about patenting rectangles was just an unsuccessful attempt to sway a jury. It isn't easy to describe a design in words. Hence the description that a picture paints 1000 words.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.