Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The GUI is gonna be the same!! imo they should update it, even if Leopard isnt that old.. Im using Windows 7 and its awesome!!
 
Yeh! A Mac OS X topic. My favourite Apple product.

More reliable is always better. I have to believe, though, that if they're updating the UI, that we'd have seen something in a release by now. Even if it can only be turned on via some hidden preference.

Just like the developer previews of Mac OS X all hinted at what was to come with Aqua...
I so no reason why Apple can't or won't do a “tada” with the UI. Whether it will come this release remains to be seen.

If they are making under the hood changes to facilitate this change, then it's unlikely those who have dug and investigated will blab (NDA). Apple has plenty of internal users at Cupertino to test software should they wish to release builds without any UI changes.

No, 10.x.x are not service packs. The simple fact is that OS X has its own release/price structure. Trying to translate it into the way Microsoft does Windows releases is meaningless.

Nail. Hammer. Bang. Bang. Bang.

i really hope they improve finder... something like "explorer" for windows would be nice... tabs would also work.....:eek:

Finder works different. Explorer's not that great anyway and in Vista and Windows 7 it added features all of which had been in OS X earlier (Smart Folders, Preview Panes).

Sure features are “missing” from the Finder (cut, tree view) bit then features are “missing” from Explorer (column view, quicklook). They are about even and which you prefer is personal preference. Making Finder like Windows Explorer is pointless.

I don't think Apple would choose Snow Leopard as a release name.

Considering that the majority of Macs are aimed at consumers - most of which just want a computer to work - to name it Snow Leopard would confuse people when asked what OS they have.

"Do you have Leopard or Snow Leopard?" Most people would say Leopard, even if they had Snow Leopard because they don't really know or care.

Maybe. But it's called Snow Leopard.

“We're calling our next release Snow Leopard”.

The announcement didn't make it sound like a codename.

I hope with Snow Leopard Apple will finally fix their standard gamma issues for displays. It's time to stop with this non standard 1.8 gamma junk. We are having more and more trouble to deal with Apple color settings in photography and video. Apparently those in my professional field that work on Windows are having less issues with color than we are. This is not what Mac is supposed to be. Most photographers and video people including myself still favor using mac for work and I think Apple should always make sure those people are among the first to have their macs running properly.

Relax. In hand.
Snow Leopard to see HFS+ compression, default gamma switch
:)

The GUI is gonna be the same!! imo they should update it, even if Leopard isnt that old.. Im using Windows 7 and its awesome!!

Compare the look and feel for iLife '09 + iWork '09 suite to Windows 7.

Understated, subtle, and beautiful, vs overstated, in-your-face and all a bit too much.

All Windows 7 does is build on Aero, which borrows heavily from the Aqua look and feel.
 

Just on that article, it says:

New default display gamma

More conspicuous if still subtle changes have also been made, including one to the default gamma (luminance) settings for display output. Macs to date have typically employed a lower-contrast but lighter 1.8 gamma level, but the new Snow Leopard build now changes this to a deeper 2.2 gamma that was previously only an option in earlier Mac OS X editions. This is to appease both visual editors as well as the everyday user, according to Apple.

Only an option in previous editions of Mac OS X? Has this author never ran the Display Calibration wizard in System Preferences?

But it is nice to see Snow Leopard using 2.2 gamma as the default - that is what I always set my display to.
 
The GUI is gonna be the same!! imo they should update it, even if Leopard isnt that old.. Im using Windows 7 and its awesome!!

Apple is not one to update for the sake of updating. Or "because windows is doing it"

I do, however, see them changing it just enough that one can easily tell at a glance if you are using Leopard or Snow Leopard. It is in their interests to do so, since the whole driving force of Apple in general is the whole "you're only cool if you have the latest and greatest" mentality. So, it won't be huge or anything, but I have a feeling it will be enough to notice...
 
the whole driving force of Apple in general is the whole "you're only cool if you have the latest and greatest" mentality.

Do you really actually believe this?
The whole driving force of Apple is to make great products. Some of the time they excel at making very great products indeed: OS X is a good example of a great Apple product.

Of course their current products are going to be the one's the focus on.
 
Compare the Windows 7 apps to the iLife '09 + iWork '09 suite.

Understated, subtle, and beautiful, vs overstated, in-your-face and all a bit too much.

True. Now that Windows 7 will drop all the Live applications, it's even worse than before. No big deal though. Mediocre (aka Movie) Maker, Photo Gallery and Media Player are terrible and cannot be compared with iMovie, iPhoto and QuickTime respectively.

All Windows 7 does is build on Aero, which borrows heavily from the Aqua look and feel.

Even the name is similar :D
 
GUIthoughts

The GUI is gonna be the same!! imo they should update it, even if Leopard isnt that old.. Im using Windows 7 and its awesome!!

if they update it i'm sure it will be last minuite change to surprise us and stop leaks of at the minuite would look the same as leopard...could be a clever leak strategy! test the OS but don't give much away to the public
 
Hahahahaha. Good one! Funniest statement yet in this thread.

Nope, not really. From interviews or presentations I have seen by Apple staff I get the impression are really passionate about what they do. Same applies to many other sucessful companies. If this isn't the case then there is probably a problem.


Concrete example: If you use Mac OS X on a laptop you may have seen the warning from software update along the lines of:
“It is recommended you have your laptop connected to a power cord before installing updates”.

The moment the Magsafe cord snaps safely in to place… the dialog dismisses itself automatically and the software starts installing.

Someone has to think of that. The feature has to be specced out, approved, programmed and tested. It's clever, simple, user focussed.

And a company solely out to make a quick buck wouldn't bother for the sake of one more button press for the end user to dismiss the dialog.

But to Apple things like that matter.
 
for all of you saying that you won't get snow leopard because it doesn't have more features here is a little parallel

lets say you love bmw's you have been driving them since you were 15 and wouldn't think of driving anything else in 2004 bmw says we have something new we redesigned our bumpers so to be hip you get a new car (money is not an issue to you) in 2005 they say we redesigned our dashboard you do the same thing in 2006 they say we redesigned the bucket seats they are now extremely comfortable in 2007 they say we redesigned our hood look and again you buy it 2008 brings you a redesigned trunk and then comes 2009 bmw announces that the car that you drive now has 50 more horsepower and a brand new transmission with six gears instead of five amazingly instead of 13 mpg this car now gets 23 but you decide to skip this car when your friend asks you why you say "it looks the same as my old car"

ya right

sound farmiliar anyone?
 
Concrete example: If you use Mac OS X on a laptop you may have seen the warning from software update along the lines of:
“It is recommended you have your laptop connected to a power cord before installing updates”.

Good example. Is there a way to turn that off? I always get that, and it's really annoying.

Apple's "whole driving force," as you put it, is to make money. Period. Their current computer line does not consist of "great products." They're OK, but way short of what they could be, due to all the compromises that have been made (not to mention the priority Apple puts on iPhones and iPods).
 
for all of you saying that you won't get snow leopard because it doesn't have more features

Snow Leopard will have more new features than Leopard did. People seem to be obsessed with counting things in numbers these days, from new features to Ghz, all of which are meaningless.

Just a taste of the new features:

Grand Central

Open CL

Hybrid SLI Support

Hybrid SLY Support

ZFS, Whole New File System, been needed for a long time

Quicktime X

Completely 64bit Kernel

Microsoft Exchange Support (dont underestimate this)

Push Notification Service

Cut down application sizes, faster running native apps

200806182326.jpg


and so many other things.
 
I would love to have it. I need my Mac to be much more stable like it was when I had Tiger. Is there a way to get it?


Wow, thats good to know. I didn't know Mail took up that much space. I would also like to see maybe an OS that didn't require as much time to boot up. For some reason, Tiger seemed to boot up much faster than Leopard now does.
 
Apple's "whole driving force," as you put it, is to make money. Period.
This goes without saying. It is the aim of any business, how you achieve that is what is important.

Let's startup a business with the goal to make money.
Now, that only leaves us with a couple of small questions, like:
What are we going to sell?
How are we going to sell it?
Where are we going to sell it?
Who are we going to sell it to?
etc.

Their current computer line does not consist of "great products."
I said Apple's driving force was to make great products, I didn't say they were always successful in achieving this goal.

If you want a comparison: Microsoft's goal was “Windows everywhere!” i.e. to get their software on as many devices as possible and get as many people as possible exposed to their software. They were very successful in achieving this goal, but it's a different sort of goal, there is no quality requirement.
 
Besides system files?

Considering system files are not typically something you would need or even want to access, the fact that they are conveniently left out of the way of actual content is a blessing, not a curse.

System files would confuse the crap out of the average user, especially the ambiguous names they have compared to other parts of the machine.

Furthermore, its impossible to forget where all of your system files are anyway. Spotlight is nothing but a quick launch at that point, and for system files? totally unnecessary

Actually I had a situation just yesterday where I couldn't find something in the system files and the inability to search for it wasted a bunch of my time. I had to dig around manually in the end - and this was just trying to run a software update to something installed on a secondary drive.

At the very least, they should allow a preference that turns on searches of the system folders.

And Spotlight defaults to search Contents rather than Filename. grrr.

I hate that too. Haven't these guys heard of PREFERENCES?
 
for all of you saying that you won't get snow leopard because it doesn't have more features here is a little parallel

lets say you love bmw's you have been driving them since you were 15 and wouldn't think of driving anything else in 2004 bmw says we have something new we redesigned our bumpers so to be hip you get a new car (money is not an issue to you) in 2005 they say we redesigned our dashboard you do the same thing in 2006 they say we redesigned the bucket seats they are now extremely comfortable in 2007 they say we redesigned our hood look and again you buy it 2008 brings you a redesigned trunk and then comes 2009 bmw announces that the car that you drive now has 50 more horsepower and a brand new transmission with six gears instead of five amazingly instead of 13 mpg this car now gets 23 but you decide to skip this car when your friend asks you why you say "it looks the same as my old car"

ya right

sound farmiliar anyone?

A little too much. I'm a computer techie @ an elementary school. Last summer we pretty much overhauled the whole wireless network and did some work on the wired one, too. And then when school started again, the teachers thought that we hadn't done anything because there weren't any big, grandiose, catchy changes. To the common person, they don't understand all the under-the-hood/infrastructure changes. They expect if something changes, it'll be a big, showy change. And that really pi**es people off like me who can understand how big & important the infrastructure is.
 
Cut down application sizes, faster running native apps

That's a common misconception and a wrong one.

Those app sizes are only smaller because they only contain english and not the many other languages - once the final versions ship with all languages back in they will be about as big as before.

You can get your apps that small now on 10.5 if you strip out the other languages.
 
A little too much. I'm a computer techie @ an elementary school. Last summer we pretty much overhauled the whole wireless network and did some work on the wired one, too. And then when school started again, the teachers thought that we hadn't done anything because there weren't any big, grandiose, catchy changes. To the common person, they don't understand all the under-the-hood/infrastructure changes. They expect if something changes, it'll be a big, showy change. And that really pi**es people off like me who can understand how big & important the infrastructure is.

well said
 
Actually I had a situation just yesterday where I couldn't find something in the system files and the inability to search for it wasted a bunch of my time. I had to dig around manually in the end - and this was just trying to run a software update to something installed on a secondary drive.

At the very least, they should allow a preference that turns on searches of the system folders.



I hate that too. Haven't these guys heard of PREFERENCES?


well there is a setting to search the system folders.

You initiate a search, press the criteria button (Kind is selected by default) select other and add "System Files".

Then anytime you want to search for system files you just select them in the criteria and set to include
 
That's a common misconception and a wrong one.

Those app sizes are only smaller because they only contain english and not the many other languages - once the final versions ship with all languages back in they will be about as big as before.

You can get your apps that small now on 10.5 if you strip out the other languages.

Thats not true, have you actually tried using the developer version? all the languages are there, you get a choice to have them removed though if you like, and its going to be the same for all native apps, you'll also get an option to have power pc or intel only installs to remove excess code which is currently an issue.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.